[
1. Ashraf, A., 2011. The Politics of Coalition Burden-Sharing: The Case of the War in Afghanistan. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Bell, R. G., 2022. Fixing NATO’s 2014 Defense Investment Pledge. and CSDP Policy Brief, 2022 (3). https://brussels-school.be/sites/default/files/CSDS%20Policy%20brief_2203.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Becker, J., 2011. Transatlantic Burden Sharing and Out of Area Operations: Afghanistan in the Context of Historic Trends. Chicago Policy Review, 2011 (15), pp 47-67.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Becker, J., 2017. Transatlantic Burden-Sharing: Origins and Strategic Implications. https://defenceindepth.co/2017/11/15/transatlantic-burden-sharing-origins-and-strategic-implications/, 12/8/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Becker, J., and Malesky, E., 2017. The continent or the ‘grand large’? Strategic culture and operational burden-sharing in NATO. International Studies Quarterly 61(1): pp 163-180.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Binnendijk, H., 2018. What NATO’s burden-sharing history teaches us, https://www.defensenews.com/smr/nato-priorities/2018/07/09/what-natos-burden-sharing-history-teaches-us/, 22/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Bjerg, Moller, S., 2021. Five Myths About NATO and Afghanistan. https://www.lawfareblog.com/five-myths-about-nato-and-afghanistan#, 10/5/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Forster, P. K., and Cimbala, S. J., 2005. The US NATO and Military Burden Sharing. London, New York: Frank Cass.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Cooper, S., and Stiles K. W., 2021. Who commits the most to NATO? It depends on how we measure commitment. Journal of Peace Research XX(X): pp 1-13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Cooper, C., A., and Zycher, B., 1989. Perceptions of NATO Burden-Sharing. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3750.html, 19/8/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Delaporte, M., (2018). NATO’s Backstage: Working the »3 Cs« Rules at Allied Command Transformation. https://defense.info/featured-story/2018/04/natos-backstage-working-the-3-cs-rules-at-allied-command-transformation/, 12/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Flockhart, T., 2014. Introduction. Changing Partnerships in a Changing World, Cooperative Security: NATO’s Partnership Policy in a Changing World, DIIS Report, pp 17-34. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/177617/WP2014-01_NATO-partnerships_TFL_web.pdf, 25/10/2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Hanagan, D. L., 2017. NATO And Coalition Warfare In Afghanistan, 2001-2014. London: King’s College.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Hartley, K., and Sandler, T., 1999. NATO Burden-Sharing: Past and Future, Journal of Peace Research. 36 (6), pp 665-80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Haesebrouck, T., and Thiem, A., 2018. Burden Sharing in CSDP Military Operations. Defence and Peace Economics, 29 (7), pp 748-765.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Hicks, K. H., Rathke, J., Daniels, S. P., Matlaga, M., Daniels, L., and Linder, A., 2018. Counting Dollars or Measuring Value. Assessing NATO and Partner Burden Sharing. Washington, DC: CSIS.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Hillison, J., R., 2014. Stepping Up: Burden Sharing by NATO’s Newest Members. Carlisle Barracks, PA: United States Army War College Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Hudhra, T., 2018. Defence Planning System of Albania in the Framework of NATO Collective Planning System. Tirana: Academy of the Armed Forces.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Jakobsen, J., 2018. Is European NATO Really free-riding? Patterns of Material and Non-Material Burden-Sharing After the Cold War. European Security 27(4): 1-25. https://doi.org./10.1080/09662839.2018.1515072, 22/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Jazbec, G., 2009. Foreign Policy Formation in the Context of Understanding Peacekeeping Operations. The Slovenian Armed Forces Bulletin, 11(1), SAF GS, Ljubljana, 2009, pp 99-116.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Kaluga, B., 2011. The International Context of the Central European States Participation in the Afghan Stabilization mission. Morgantown: Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Kavanagh, J. et al., 2021. Building Military Coalitions. Lessons from U.S. Experience, https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA859-1.html, 12/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Kivimäki, T., 2019. Power, Contribution and Dependence in NATO Burden Sharing. European Security, 20:1, pp 66-84.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Kingsley, R., 2014. Fighting against Allies: An Examination of »National Caveats« Within the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) Campaign in Afghanistan and their Impact on ISAF Operational Effectiveness 2002-2012. Manawatu: Massey University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Koivula, T., 2021. Carry That Weight: Assessing Continuity and Change in NATO’s Burden-Sharing Disputes. Defense & Security Analysis, 37:2, pp 145-163.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Kreps, S., 2007. When Does the Mission Determine the Coalition? The Logic of Multilateral Interventions under Unipolarity. Washington, DC: Graduate School of Arts and Science of Georgetown University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Mannik, E., 2004. Small States: Invited to NATO – Able to Contribute? Defence & Security Analysis, 20;1, pp 21-37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. McNamara, M. E., 2015. When Contributions Abroad Mean Security at Home? The Baltic States and NATO Burden-Sharing in Afghanistan. https://www.academia.edu/9027180/When_Contributions_Abroad_Mean_Security_at_Home_The_Baltic_States_and_NATO_Burden_Sharing_in_Afghanistan, 12/10/2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Milovac, B., 2016. Značilnosti teoretičnega obravnavanja načina vojskovanja razvitih držav po koncu hladne vojne (»Characteristics of a Theoretical Study of a Way of Warfare of Developed Countries in the Post-Cold War Era«). Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Mattelaer, A., 2016. Revisiting the Principles of NATO Burden-Sharing. Parameters 46. https://press.armywarcollege.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2821&context=parameters, 12/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Molder, H., 2013. Estonia and the ISAF: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects. The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs, 23(2): pp 61-78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. NATO, 2019. The North Atlantic Treaty. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_17120.htm, 19/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. NATO, 2022a. Defence Expenditure of NATO States (2014-2022). https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/220627-def-exp-2022-en.pdf, 20/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. NATO, 2022b. Funding NATO. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_67655.htm, 20/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. NATO document, 2017. Summary Note to Council on the Need to Improve NATO’s Capability Package Process. https://www.nato.int/issues/iban/performance_audits/170201-improve-capability-package-process-eng.pdf, 17/8/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Oma, I., 2012. Explaining States’ Burden-Sharing Behaviour Within NATO. Cooperation and Conflict 47(4): pp 562-573.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Pavlíčková, K., and Bartoszewicz M. G., 2020. To Free or not to Free (Ride): A Comparative Analysis of the NATO Burden-Sharing in the Czech Republic and Lithuania. Defense & Security Analysis, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337199208_To_Free_or_Not_to_Free_Ride_A_Comparative_Analysis_of_the_NATO_BurdenSharing_in_the_Czech_Republic_and_Lithuania, 20/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Polajžer, T., 2013. Jugosfera: fikcija ali resničnost? (»Yugosphere: Fiction or Reality?«). Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. US Budget, 2023. North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program. April 2022. https://comptroller.defense.gov/portals/45/documents/defbudget/fy2023/budget_justification/pdfs/11_nato_security_investment_program/fy23_nato_security_investment_program.pdf, 17/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Ringsmose, J., 2010. NATO Burden-Sharing Redux: Continuity and Change after the Cold War. Contemporary Security Policy, 31(2), pp 319-338.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Rotfeld, A., D., 1994. Europe: Towards a New Regional Security Regime. SIPRI Yearbook 1994. https://www.sipri.org/yearbook/1994/07, 24/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Ržen, J., 2013. Vpliv vključenosti Republike Slovenije v sistem obrambnega planiranja Nata na razvoj zmogljivosti njenega obrambnega Sistema (»The Impact of the Republic of Slovenia’s Inclusion in the NATO Defence Planning System on the Capabilities Development of its Defence System«). Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Sperling, J., and Webber, M., 2009. NATO. From Kosovo to Kabul, May 2009, International Affairs 85(3): pp 491-511, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227652515_Nato_From_Kosovo_to_Kabul, 18/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Šavc, P., 2009. The Slovenian Experience of Defence Planning and NATO Membership. The Slovenian Armed Forces Bulletin (11/No. 3), pp 41-58 Ljubljana: General Staff of the Slovenian Armed Forces.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Urbelis, V., 2015. The Relevance and Influence of Small States in NATO and the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy. Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, 2014-2015, Volume 13, pp 61-78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Zyla, B., 2016. NATO Burden Sharing: A New Research Agenda. JIOS, 7 (2), pp 5-21 http://journal-iostudies.org/sites/default/files/2020-01/JIOS_Fall2016_Zyla-NATO_0.pdf, 20/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Zycher, B., 1990. A Generalized Approach for Analysis of Alliance Burden Sharing. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N3047.html, 15/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Žerjavič, P., 2017. Trump, Nato in trojni C (»Trump, NATO and the Triple C«). Delo, 25/5. https://old.delo.si/svet/evropa/trump-nato-in-trojni-c.html, 15/7/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
