The Presence of Lactobacillus spp. and its Effect on the Occurrence of Other Microorganisms in the Reproductive Tract of Polish Women
25 ago 2024
Acerca de este artículo
Categoría del artículo: ORIGINAL PAPER
Publicado en línea: 25 ago 2024
Páginas: 265 - 273
Recibido: 05 feb 2024
Aceptado: 24 may 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2024-024
Palabras clave
© 2024 Aneta Kiecka et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Relationship between the presence of Lactobacillus spp_ and other microorganisms_
Microorganisms | Presence | n (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
No | 988 (95.1%) | 30 (65.2%) | 108 (81.8%) | 600 (98.2%) | 250 (100%) | < 0.001 | |
Yes | 51 (4.9%) | 16 (34.8%) | 24 (18.2%) | 11 (1.8%) | 0 (0%) | – | |
No | 874 (84.1%) | 36 (78.3%) | 109 (82.6%) | 520 (85.1%) | 209 (83.6%) | 0.542 | |
Yes | 165 (15.9%) | 10 (21.7%) | 23 (17.4%) | 91 (14.9%) | 41 (16.4%) | – | |
No | 959 (92.3%) | 40 (87.0%) | 119 (90.2%) | 566 (92.6%) | 234 (93.6%) | 0.299 | |
Yes | 80 (7.7%) | 6 (13.0%) | 13 (9.8%) | 45 (7.4%) | 16 (6.4%) | – | |
No | 1020 (98.2%) | 42 (91.3%) | 129 (97.7%) | 601 (98.4%) | 248 (99.2%) | 0.0153 | |
Yes | 19 (1.8%) | 4 (8.7%) | 3 (2.3%) | 10 (1.6%) | 2 (0.8%) | – | |
No | 1038 (99.9%) | 45 (97.8%) | 132 (100%) | 611 (100%) | 250 (100%) | 0.0443 | |
Yes | 1 (0.1%) | 1 (2.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | – | |
No | 1031 (99.2%) | 46 (100%) | 131 (99.2%) | 606 (99.2%) | 248 (99.2%) | 1.000 | |
Yes | 8 (0.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.8%) | 5 (0.8%) | 2 (0.8%) | – | |
Enterobacterales | No | 984 (94.7%) | 36 (78.3%) | 112 (84.8%) | 590 (96.6%) | 246 (98.4%) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 55 (5.3%) | 10 (21.7%) | 20 (15.2%) | 21 (3.4%) | 4 (1.6%) | – | |
No | 958 (92.2%) | 34 (73.9%) | 108 (81.8%) | 571 (93.5%) | 245 (98.0%) | < 0.001 | |
Yes | 81 (7.8%) | 12 (26.1%) | 24 (18.2%) | 40 (6.5%) | 5 (2.0%) | – | |
Yeast | No | 862 (83.0%) | 39 (84.8%) | 111 (84.1%) | 506 (82.8%) | 206 (82.4%) | 0.976 |
Yes | 177 (17.0%) | 7 (15.2%) | 21 (15.9%) | 105 (17.2%) | 44 (17.6%) | – | |
No | 1039 (100%) | 46 (100%) | 132 (100%) | 611 (100%) | 250 (100%) | – | |
Yes | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | – | |
No | 1039 (100%) | 46 (100%) | 132 (100%) | 611 (100%) | 250 (100%) | – | |
Yes | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | – |
The pH values in women with and without the occurrence of microorganisms_
Microorganisms | Not prevalent | Prevalent | pH > 4.5 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Q2 (Q1–Q3) | n | Q2 (Q1–Q3) | OR (95% CI) |
|||
46 | 5.5 (5.0; 5.5) | 993 | 4.5 (4.0; 4.5) | < 0.001 | 0.01 (0.00; 0.05) | < 0.001 | |
988 | 4.5 (4.0; 4.5) | 51 | 5.0 (5.0; 5.5) | < 0.001 | 12.18 (6.31; 23.48) | < 0.001 | |
874 | 4.5 (4.0; 4.5) | 165 | 4.5 (4.5; 5.0) | < 0.001 | 1.74 (1.21; 2.50) | 0.003 | |
959 | 4.5 (4.0; 4.5) | 80 | 4.5 (4.4; 5.0) | 0.009 | 2.36 (1.47; 3.78) | < 0.001 | |
1020 | 4.5 (4.0; 4.5) | 19 | 4.5 (4.5; 5.0) | 0.014 | 2.88 (1.18; 7.01) | 0.020 | |
1038 | 4.5 (4.0; 4.5) | 1 | 5.0 (5.0; 5.0) | 0.203 | 11.50 (0.46; 284.64) | 0.136 | |
1031 | 4.5 (4.0; 4.5) | 8 | 4.5 (4.4; 4.6) | 0.698 | 1.27 (0.29; 5.52) | 0.748 | |
Enterobacterales | 984 | 4.5 (4.0; 4.5) | 55 | 5.0 (4.5; 5.0) | < 0.001 | 6.10 (3.47; 10.74) | < 0.001 |
958 | 4.5 (4.0; 4.5) | 81 | 5.0 (4.5; 5.0) | < 0.001 | 5.06 (3.17; 8.06) | < 0.001 | |
Yeast | 862 | 4.5 (4.0; 4.5) | 177 | 4.5 (4.5; 5.0) | 0.001 | 1.66 (1.16; 2.37) | 0.005 |
Occurrence of individual microorganisms in women with and without symptoms qualified for the study and the microbiological methods used_
Microorganisms | Method | Total | Without symptoms (n = 752) | With symptoms (n = 287) | OR |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||||||
0 | microscopic | 46 (4.4%) | 19 (2.5%) | 27 (9.4%) | < 0.001 | 1 (REF.) | – | |
1 | 132 (12.7%) | 90 (12.0%) | 42 (14.6%) | 0.33 (0.17; 0.66) | 0.002 | |||
2 | 611 (58.8%) | 451 (60.0%) | 160 (55.7%) | 0.25 (0.14; 0.46) | < 0.001 | |||
3 | 250 (24.1%) | 192 (25.5%) | 58 (20.2%) | 0.22 (0.11; 0.41) | < 0.001 | |||
culture, microscopic | 51 (4.9%) | 11 (1.5%) | 40 (13.9%) | < 0.001 | 10.55 (5.40; 20.63) | < 0.001 | ||
PCR | 165 (15.9%) | 81 (10.8%) | 84 (29.3%) | < 0.001 | 3.42 (2.43; 4.82) | < 0.001 | ||
PCR | 80 (7.7%) | 27 (3.6%) | 53 (18.5%) | < 0.001 | 6.02 (3.71; 9.75) | < 0.001 | ||
PCR | 19 (1.8%) | 0 (0%) | 19 (6.6%) | < 0.001 | 109.30 (6.58; 1,816.53) | 0.001 | ||
PCR | 1 (0.1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.3%) | 0.276 | 7.88 (0.32; 193.98) | 0.207 | ||
PCR | 8 (0.8%) | 1 (0.1%) | 7 (2.4%) | < 0.001 | 13.40 (2.31; 77.74) | 0.004 | ||
Enterobacterales | culture | 55 (5.3%) | 35 (4.7%) | 20 (7.0%) | 0.162 | 1.55 (0.88; 2.72) | 0.127 | |
culture | 81 (7.8%) | 57 (7.6%) | 24 (8.4%) | 0.698 | 1.12 (0.69; 1.84) | 0.641 | ||
Yeast | culture, microscopic | 177 (17.0%) | 100 (13.3%) | 77 (26.8%) | < 0.001 | 2.39 (1.71; 3.34) | < 0.001 | |
culture | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | – | – | – | ||
culture | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | – | – | – |
Relationship between the occurrence microorganisms and symptoms_
Microorganisms | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR |
OR |
OR |
|||||
1 | 0.31 (0.15; 0.61) | < 0.001 | 0.42 (0.20; 0.87) | 0.019 | 0.33 (0.16; 0.69) | 0.003 | |
2 | 0.23 (0.12; 0.43) | < 0.001 | 0.38 (0.19; 0.76) | 0.006 | 0.27 (0.13; 0.54) | < 0.001 | |
3 | 0.20 (0.10; 0.38) | < 0.001 | 0.38 (0.18; 0.81) | 0.012 | 0.23 (0.10; 0.50) | < 0.001 | |
10.47 (5.36; 20.47) | < 0.001 | 7.83 (3.93; 15.61) | < 0.001 | 10.03 (4.92; 20.47) | < 0.001 | ||
3.40 (2.42; 4.79) | < 0.001 | 3.18 (2.25; 4.50) | < 0.001 | 2.93 (2.06; 4.16) | < 0.001 | ||
5.98 (3.69; 9.69) | < 0.001 | 5.69 (3.49; 9.28) | < 0.001 | 5.56 (3.40; 9.09) | < 0.001 | ||
111.18 (6.71; 1,842.58) | 0.001 | 98.35 (5.93; 1,631.18) | 0.001 | 94.56 (5.72; 1,563.34) | 0.001 | ||
13.21 (2.28; 76.60) | 0.004 | 13.56 (2.31; 79.70) | 0.004 | 10.12 (1.69; 60.80) | 0.011 | ||
Yeast | 2.38 (1.70; 3.32) | < 0.001 | 2.24 (1.59; 3.14) | < 0.001 | 1.93 (1.36; 2.74) | < 0.001 |
The association between presence of Lactobacillus and other microorganisms – multivariable logistic regression models_
Microorganisms | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Per 1 category level increase | Not present | Present | Not present | Present | ||
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
Yeast | 1.04 (0.83; 1.30) | 1.32 (1.02; 1.71) | 1 (REF.) | 0.97 (0.43; 2.18) | 1 (REF.) | 1.69 (0.70; 4.07) |
Enterobacterales | 0.35 (0.25; 0.48) | 0.54 (0.37; 0.81) | 1 (REF.) | 0.19 (0.09; 0.40) | 1 (REF.) | 0.78 (0.31; 1.97) |
0.40 (0.30; 0.52) | 0.63 (0.45; 0.89) | 1 (REF.) | 0.23 (0.11; 0.47) | 1 (REF.) | 0.99 (0.42; 2.29) | |
0.14 (0.09; 0.21) | 0.20 (0.12; 0.32) | 1 (REF.) | 0.05 (0.02; 0.11) | 1 (REF.) | 0.21 (0.09; 0.51) | |
1.12 (0.45; 2.79) | 1.39 (0.52; 3.75) | 1 (REF.) | 0.67 (0.04; 11.0) | 1 (REF.) | 1.19 (0.06; 24.33) | |
0.47 (0.28; 0.78) | 0.61 (0.32; 1.16) | 1 (REF.) | 0.16 (0.05; 0.49) | 1 (REF.) | 0.32 (0.08; 1.32) | |
0.91 (0.72; 1.13) | 1.16 (0.89; 1.50) | 1 (REF.) | 0.58 (0.28; 1.19) | 1 (REF.) | 1.02 (0.46; 2.26) | |
0.75 (0.56; 1.01) | 0.88 (0.62; 1.25) | 1 (REF.) | 0.45 (0.19; 1.07) | 1 (REF.) | 0.70 (0.26; 1.90) |