[1. Brown A.D. 2002. Organization Studies and identity: Towards a research agenda, “Human Relations”, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 113-121.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Cilliers P. 2000. What Can We Learn From a Theory of Complexity?, “Emergence”, No. 2, pp. 23-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Collins J. 2001. Good to great: Why Some Companies Make The Leap...and Others Don’t, Harper Business, New York, pp. 96-110.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Godin S. 2000. In the Face of Change the Competent are Helpless, Fast Company, January-February, pp. 230–234.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Dyer L., Ericksen J. 2007 Dynamic Organizations: Achieving Marketplace Agility Through Workforce Scalability, [in:] J. Storey (ed.), Human Resource Management: A Critical Text, 3rd Edition, Thomson Learning, London, pp. 263-280.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Dyer L., Ericksen J. 2009. Complexity-based Agile Enterprises: Putting Self-Organizing Emergence to Work, [in:] T. Redman, A. Wilkinson (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Human Resource Management, Sage, London, pp. 436-457.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Hamel G., Valikangas L. 2003. The Quest for Resilience, Harvard Business Review, September, 2003, pp. 52-63.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Holbrook M. 2003. Adventures in Complexity, “Academy of Marketing Science Review”, No. 6, pp. 1-181.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Stacey R. 2006. The Science of Complexity: An Alternative Perspective for Strategic Change Processes, [in:] R. MacIntosh, D. Maclean, R. Stacey, D. Griffin (eds.), Complexity and Organization: Readings and Concersations, Routledge, London, pp. 74-100.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Stacey R., Griffin D. Shaw P. 2000 Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking?, Routledge, London, pp. 54.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Ulewicz R., Mazur M. 2013. Fatigue testing structural steel as a factor of safety of technical facilities maintenance, „Production Engineering Archives”, Vol. 1, No 1, pp 32-34.]Search in Google Scholar
