<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The paper presents the critical commentary on the judgment, in which the Supreme Court classified unlawfull disposals of a co-owned item commited by a co-owner as misappropriation of someone else’s movable item. The legal assessment carried out by the Supreme Court can hardly be approved, as it is based on a widespread and yet incorrect interpretation of the concept of someone else’s item, considering it to be someone else’s property in relation to its co-owner. The behaviour in question fulfils rather the features of misappropriation of property right in the form of another co-owner’s participation in co-ownership. The Supreme Court partially based its assessment on the reasons justifying the latter legal qualification, however did not draw proper conclusions therefrom and did not decide to depart from the dominant case-law opinion.</p>
</abstract>

The paper presents the critical commentary on the judgment, in which the Supreme Court classified unlawfull disposals of a co-owned item commited by a co-owner as misappropriation of someone else’s movable item. The legal assessment carried out by the Supreme Court can hardly be approved, as it is based on a widespread and yet incorrect interpretation of the concept of someone else’s item, considering it to be someone else’s property in relation to its co-owner. The behaviour in question fulfils rather the features of misappropriation of property right in the form of another co-owner’s participation in co-ownership. The Supreme Court partially based its assessment on the reasons justifying the latter legal qualification, however did not draw proper conclusions therefrom and did not decide to depart from the dominant case-law opinion.

Gloss on the Supreme Court Judgment of 3 February 2021, III KK 561/19

dr hab., adiunkt w Katedrze Prawa Karnego

Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

Ius Novum

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

{"article-title":"Gloss on the Supreme Court Judgment of 3 February 2021, III KK 561/19"}

The paper presents the critical commentary on the judgment, in which the Supreme Court classified unlawfull disposals of a co-owned item commited by a co-owner...

Gloss on the Supreme Court Judgment of 3 February 2021, III KK 561/19

Publicado en línea: 01 mar 2023

Páginas: 189 - 202

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.4.2022.45-m.galazka

Palabras clave
misappropriation, misappropriation of property right, criminal law protection of co-ownership, offences against property

© 2022 Lazarski University, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Gloss on the Supreme Court Judgment of 3 February 2021, III KK 561/19

Publicado en línea: 01 mar 2023

Páginas: 189 - 202

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.4.2022.45-m.galazka

Palabras clavemisappropriation, misappropriation of property right, criminal law protection of co-ownership, offences against property

© 2022 Lazarski University, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Palabras clave
misappropriation, misappropriation of property right, criminal law protection of co-ownership, offences against property