Publicado en línea: 14 abr 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2025-0003
Palabras clave
© 2025 Jarosław Poteraj, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The pension system operating in Peru is a unique formula on a global scale of parallel functioning of pay-as-you-go and capital-based schemes. The formula of freedom of choice, practically unavailable in countries reforming their pension systems since 1994, was preserved in Peru, which introduced the pension reform by law at the end of 1992 and modelled it on the Chilean reform.
The insurance method, as a way of transferring risk by transferring losses to another entity, is widely recognized as one of the ways to ensure financial security during the period of inactivity due to advanced age (1). In the historical development of pension concepts, the insurance method was used from the beginning, being the basis for the pension structure proposed in 1889 by Bismarck (2). The author also wrote about the insurance method in managing old age risk in theoretical considerations from 2011 (3) and in application, on the example of Austria, in 2013 (4).
There is a lot of literature on pension issues in Peru, both in Spanish and English. Many of them are used by the author and included in the bibliography. However, in Poland, the Peruvian pension system has only been examined twice so far, and each time in partial exemplification only. Both examples come from articles by Stańko published in 2010. The first discusses multi-funding in pension systems (5), and the second examines transfers of funds between pension funds (6).
In this article, the descriptive method was used to present historical changes, and the desk research method was used to present the current state and to formulate hypotheses. The author hypothesises that the insurance method, permanently present in the Peruvian pension system, is decreasing its importance in favour of the investment and supply from budget funds methods and an auxiliary hypothesis that the impact of “black swans” on human behaviour may lead to the complete annihilation of resources accumulated with rational justification for retirement purposes. The article is presented in the following order: 1. General information about the country, 2. Historical development of the pension system, 3. Current state of the pension system and 4. Challenges and expected changes in the pension system.
The Republic of Peru
(7) (Spanish:
The beginnings of the broadly understood social security system in Peru date back to 1911
(13), when accident insurance appeared, expanded in 1935 to include occupational diseases. However, pension regulations in Peru appeared in 1936
(14), when the first pension solution for hired workers in this country was created. In the same year, workers were covered by sickness insurance
(15). In 1948, sickness insurance also covered white-collar workers
(16). In 1962
(17), a general pension law was introduced for white-collar workers. It was then that a special retirement solution for government employees, the so-called „
In the 1970s, Peru implemented a “segmented universalism” model of social protection policy. The two main areas of action are: a) improving traditional social policy sectors such as education, health, pensions and housing and b) reforming fiscal policy to increase redistribution and reduce economic and social inequalities. In the education and health sectors, Peru has developed a public system with free services aimed at the poorest segments of the population. It also developed an important housing policy based on the “young cities” program (
Established in 1993, the Peruvian pension system, largely modelled on the Chilean system, gave workers the choice of contributing to a pay-as-you-go system, financed by public funds, or to an individual account managed by one of eight pension fund management companies (
Employees covered by the SNP public scheme could switch to individual accounts at any time but could not return to the public scheme. The participation of self-employed people was voluntary. The statutory retirement age for the SNP was 60 for men and 55 for women, with at least 20 years of contributions. Despite drastic solvency problems, SNP contributions remained at 9% of earnings.
The statutory retirement age for SPP is 65, with the possibility of early retirement at any age if assets accumulated in the individual account replace at least 50% of average earnings over the last 120 months. The SPP contribution was set at 11% of remuneration
(32). Contributions made by the employee were recorded in a personal account called the Individual Capitalization Account ( no minimum pension guarantee has been introduced in Peru, mandatory and voluntary contributions to individual accounts were not tax deductible, but pension benefits were taxed, no earnings limits were introduced for paying mandatory pension contributions, but pension and family insurance contributions were subject to earnings limits, discretionary bonds do not actually bear interest
(34), i.e. they are indexed to prices and receive a zero real interest rate, a maximum limit (PEN 60,000
(35)) was introduced to recognize past contributions to the old system, new employees in the workforce are not automatically affiliated with the new system - they have the right to choose, and there is a uniform retirement age of 65 for men and women.
In 1995, the SNP contribution was increased from 9% to 11% of earnings, and the SNP retirement age was increased to 65 for both sexes (36). Moreover, the legal possibility of introducing a guaranteed minimum pension in SPP was introduced (without practical application) (37).
In 1996, participants in the
From January 1, 1997, the amount of the SNP pension contribution was increased to 13% of remuneration (40).
In 2000 (41), the possibility of early retirement was introduced. According to estimates by the International Labor Organization, approximately 50% of the economically active urban Peruvian population operated in the informal economy in 2000 (42).
In 2001, SAFP entered the structure of the Banking and Insurance Supervision (
From 1996 to 2002, funds managed by AFPs grew at an average annual rate of 29.7%. However, among SPP participants in June 2002, only 39.1% paid pension contributions (45). The average ROE achieved in 2002 for AFPs alone was 59.6%, and the average in the period 1996–2002 was 38.8% (46). In December 2002, the SPP contribution was 8% of remuneration. Additionally, the participant paid a commission to AFP (its average value was approximately 2.27% of remuneration) and 1.24% to disability insurance. The total contribution burden of an SPP participant was approximately 11.51% of remuneration, and 26.9% of the economically active population participated in SPP (47). In 2002, the legal possibility of operating a guaranteed minimum pension in SPP, which had existed since 1995, was introduced (48). In 2002, a formula was also adopted to systematically reduce the replacement rate in the SNP from the then applicable 50% to 30% from 2038 and to calculate the reference value as the average of the last 60 months (49).
A law from December 2003 obliged AFPs to offer three different types of funds with different levels of risk, instead of the previous solution of one fund (50) with a balanced investment portfolio (51). The second fund would invest mainly in fixed-interest instruments, and the third in shares.
In April 2004, changes were made to the special legal regulation
At the beginning of 2005, pension contributions to the SNP were increased to 13% of salary. Until May 2, 2005, all AFPs operating in Peru were required to register at least two pension funds
(54): Type 1,
At the beginning of 2006, the amount of the SPP contribution was restored to the statutory level of 10% from 8% in force in 1996–2005 (58). In July 2006, the Pension Supervision Authority (SBS) published a preliminary report on the status and desired directions of changes in the Peruvian pension system (59). On November 9, 2006, the central bank increased the limit on the share of investments in foreign securities for pension funds from 10.2% to 12.0%, with the option of further changes in the future (60). At the end of 2006, the current SNP deficit was estimated at the equivalent of over USD 21 billion, of which USD 10.6 billion were existing liabilities to retirees (460,539 pensioners received benefits at that time), and USD 9.9 billion were liabilities to professionally active people, without coverage from the SNP’s assets (61).
The law of March 2007 allowed employees who were contributors to the public system before December 31, 1995, and later became participants in the individual pension account scheme, to return to the public system (62). In 2007, more than 40% of people aged 75 or older were considered poor; in rural areas, approximately 65% of this age group was poor (63). At the same time, less than 10% of people aged 60 and over received any pension. In 2007 (64), the possibility of early retirement for unemployed people was introduced. Estimates of the structure of Peru’s labour force in 2007 included 20% formal workers, 50% independent and informal workers, 22% dependent but informal workers, and 8% unemployed. Of these groups, only the first one was present in pension solutions (65). At the end of 2007, the lowest and highest SNP pensions were PEN 415 and PEN 857 per month, respectively, and were paid 14 times a year (66). In 2007, FCR was co-financed with an amount equivalent to USD 2.1 billion (67).
On November 3, 2008, the Pension Supervision Authority (SBS) presented to Congress a proposal to introduce changes to the system of mandatory individual accounts, including the introduction of the obligation for AFP to operate a fourth (low-risk) fund with a guaranteed minimum rate of return, and the introduction of government subsidies for account holders over the age of 65 years who have very low balances and do not qualify for the minimum pension guarantee, and establishing early retirement options for unemployed people aged 55 to 64 (68).
To help the long-term unemployed population during the global economic crisis, a new law was passed in July 2009 that allowed early retirement until the end of 2012 for SPP account holders aged 55 for men and 50 for women who had been unemployed for at least 12 consecutive months. From September 1, 2009, holders of individual accounts in Peru could choose from two new pension benefits, which are paid in two currencies - Peruvian PEN and US dollars (USD)
(69). In the
On September 14, 2010, the Central Bank increased the limit for pension funds to invest abroad to 30% of total assets (71). This increase, as stated in the release, was the latest in a series that began in 2006. In 2010, there were 1.73 million people over the age of 65 in Peru, representing 5.9% of the total population. Women constituted the majority in this age group - 54.1% (72).
On July 13, 2011, the Congress of Peru raised the limit on pension funds for investments abroad from 30% to 50% of assets
(73). On September 13, 2011, a new government program for older people was introduced, in the form of a non-contributory pension
(74), called “Pensión 65” (correctly
On July 19, 2012, a new act on pension reform was passed, which introduced serious changes to the almost 20-year-old system of individual accounts in the country. The most important changes concerned (76): 1) the obligation to participate in the SNP scheme for self-employed persons with income exceeding 1.5 times the minimum wage (PEN 1,125), 2) the introduction of a social pension for employees who are over 40 years of age and earn less than this threshold and are not covered by any other pension system; the social pension was to be financed by employee contributions and government subsidies, 3) assigning new members of the labour force to the AFP with the lowest administrative fee; the selection was to be made through a tender process (taking place every two years) open to any existing or planning to enter the AFP market - the first competition was to be held by December 2012. However, the first tender was carried out in September 2012 for the fourth quarter of 2012. As a result, from October to December 2012, all new participants in the individual account system were assigned to the AFP “Prima” pension company, which offered the lowest administrative fee in the September tender (77). Moreover, in 2012 (78), the system of individual pension accounts was modified and special pension rules for disabled people were introduced.
In January 2013, it was reported that in the period from February 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014, all new employees were to be assigned to the AFP “Habitat” fund, which won the tender organized by the pension funds supervisory authority in December 2012 (79).
On September 16, 2014, the President signed an act that gave self-employed people the opportunity to choose between participating in SPP or SNP (80).
On January 21, 2015, a special legal regulation was introduced regarding people with severe disabilities, including the payment of new non-contributory benefits to poor disabled people, regardless of age, in the amount of PEN 125 per month (81).
On April 14, 2016, the Congress of Peru overrode the presidential veto of legislation which added new withdrawal options to a privately funded scheme (SPP) (82). The new regulations allowed SPP members, among other things, to withdraw almost all account balances (95.5%) in lump sums upon reaching the statutory retirement age (then 65) or meeting the requirements for early retirement. In addition, SPP members were able to make penalty-free withdrawals from their accounts before retirement to cover the costs of major life events, including using 25% of the account balance as security for a home purchase and 50% of the account balance in the event of terminal illness.
On May 3, 2019, Peru changed the early retirement rules for its privately funded scheme (SPP)
(83). The reform permanently introduced the early retirement option for unemployed people (
In April 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, employee contributions to SPP were suspended (84). Some SPP participants were also allowed a one-time withdrawal of PEN 2,000 from their retirement accounts. The government paid non-contributory pensions from “Pension 65” in advance for 4 months. On May 8, 2020, Peru implemented new rules allowing participants in the country’s privately funded scheme (SPP) to make one-time early withdrawals from their accounts during the COVID-19 pandemic (85). The allowed withdrawal amount depended on the participant’s account balance and for balances below PEN 4,300 (86) it allowed the withdrawal of 100% of the accumulated resources, for balances between PEN 4,300 and PEN 17,200 an amount of PEN 4,300 (in two instalments), for balances between PEN 17,200 and PEN 51,600 at least PEN 4,300 but not more than 25% of the account balance (in two instalments), and for amounts exceeding PEN 51,600, at least PEN 4,300 but not more than PEN 12,900 (in two instalments). The participant had 60 calendar days from May 18, 2020, to submit a withdrawal request to AFP, which administers his or her individual account. On November 18, 2020, the government of Peru passed a law authorizing a second round of special payments from the private funded scheme (SPP) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (87). By law, unemployed SPP participants could withdraw up to 4 Reference Tax Units (UIT) if they had not paid contributions in the 12-month period ending October 31, 2020, or up to 1 UIT if they had paid them in that 12-month period, but not in October 2020. From December 9, 2020, SPP participants had 90 calendar days to submit a withdrawal request to their AFP. Additionally, SPP participants diagnosed with cancer by a registered healthcare provider could withdraw up to 4 UITs from their accounts, regardless of their employment status or contribution history.
According to government estimates from March 2021, approximately 18.8% of Peruvians aged 60 or older are members of the SNP, 8.7% are members of the SPP, 6% are members of special programs, and 66.5% have no program affiliation. Peruvians who do not qualify for an SNP or SPP pension and are aged 65 or over are entitled to a social assistance pension if they are members of households classified as extremely poor. On July 22, 2021, the Government of Peru passed reforms to the national public pay-as-you-go scheme (SNP), which expanded access to the SNP early pension and introduced a special partial pension (88). The reforms aimed to improve pension security among older people who faced barriers in obtaining pension rights, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. The changes concerned: 1) the possibility for all SNP members to receive a pension from the age of 50 if they have paid contributions for at least 25 years (89), 2) the reference earnings used to calculate the benefit became the monthly covered earnings in the 60 months preceding the last month of payment contributions (90); the amount of the early retirement pension could not be lower than the minimum monthly pension of PEN 500 or higher than the maximum monthly pension of PEN 893, 3) a partial pension was introduced for people who are over 65 years old, in the amount of up to PEN 250 with contributions paid from 10 to 14 years or up to PEN 350 with contributions paid from 15 to 19 years (91), and 4) restrictions on the employment of retirees have been removed - SNP retirees are no longer subject to earnings restrictions when continuing or resuming employment (92).
According to the analysis prepared by
Key Reforms and Their Impacts
Year | Reform | Impact |
---|---|---|
1992 | Introduction of individual pension accounts (SPP) alongside SNP | Shift from public PAYG to private funded schemes; increased competition |
2002 | Implementation of guaranteed minimum pension in SPP | Enhanced financial security for low-income retirees in SPP |
2012 | Mandatory participation of self-employed in SNP; new social pension introduced | Increased coverage of pension system, addressing informal sector issues |
2020 | COVID-19 pandemic-related measures allowing mass withdrawals from SPP | Significant reduction in retirement savings; risk to long-term system stability |
The Peruvian pension system consists of two main components
(94). Public and private sector employees entering the workforce can choose between a public pay-as-you-go scheme (
In the case of
In the case of self-employed people, contributions amount to 13% of the declared income. The minimum monthly income used to calculate contributions is the statutory minimum wage, which is PEN 1,025. There is no limit on the maximum income taken to calculate the contribution amount.
Age 50 is required for
You may also receive
All benefits are adjusted periodically depending on the financial resources of the system.
In addition,
In
For self-employed people, contributions are 10% of the value of declared income plus a certain percentage of income (for administrative fees) and 1.35% of monthly insured income (disability and family insurance). The percentage of pension contributions is regulated by law; administrative fee percentages and disability and survivors’ insurance contributions are determined by the AFP. There are no specific maximum incomes used to calculate pension contributions. However, the maximum monthly income is used to calculate contributions in the case of disability insurance - this amount is PEN 10,535.
Pension from an individual account is payable abroad on the basis of a bilateral or multilateral agreement.
Comparison of SNP and SPP
Criteria | SNP (Public PAYG) | SPP (Private Funded) |
---|---|---|
Funding Source | Employee contributions (13%) + state subsidies | Employee contributions (10%) + investment returns |
Retirement Age | 65 (both genders) | 65 (early retirement possible with conditions) |
Pension Calculation | Based on average salary over last 60 months | Based on individual account balance |
Tax Treatment | No tax incentives; pensions taxed | No tax incentives; pensions taxed |
Impact of ‚Black Swans’ | Limited due to state guarantee, but fiscal pressure increases | High vulnerability due to possibility of mass withdrawals |
The most important challenge facing the pension system in Peru seems to be the dissemination of the scale of participation in pension solutions. In the fourth quarter of 2021, only 35.3% of the elderly population were covered by any pension scheme, of which 19.5% were linked to the SNP, 10.2% were linked to the SPP, and 2.9% were linked to the government
The Peruvian pension system has undergone multiple reforms since the 1990s, each with distinct implications for its long-term financial stability. While these reforms aimed to address emerging economic, demographic, and political challenges, they have also introduced vulnerabilities that could undermine the system’s sustainability.
The pension system in Peru is undoubtedly different from most countries, which adopt a multi-pillar concept or separate schemes dedicated to specific professional groups. The solution adopted in this country provides for direct competition between the public and private schemes for the resources of the same participants. The evolution of private pension funds in Peru has been seriously affected by unfair competition between the private and public pillars. Initially, lower contribution rates and lower retirement ages for entities affiliated with the public pillar significantly reduced the attractiveness of private pension funds at the very beginning of the system reform. However, since 1995, after equalizing the input parameters, the private scheme has gained a significant advantage over the public scheme. After equalizing the operating conditions, pensions paid from SPP became significantly higher than benefits from SNP (107). However, the pandemic problems of recent years have reversed the preferences of many Peruvians, and according to the latest data, almost twice as many of the elderly participated in the SNP than in the SPP (108). Of the latter, 95% of those retiring use the option of a one-off payment of 95.5% of the resources accumulated in their retirement account, available since 2016 (109).
Due to the presence of a premium as a source of financing and a common risk fund, the SNP scheme can be considered a solution using the insurance method. However, it should be noted that the insurance method is supplemented in many partial elements by the supply from budget funds method. However, the SPP scheme is an example of using the investment method, also supplemented with the supply from budget funds method. The hypothesis that the insurance method, permanently present in the Peruvian pension system, is decreasing its importance in favour of the investment and supply from budget funds methods was confirmed.
The actions taken by the Peruvian authorities twice in 2020, caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, enabling in the case of some participants to withdraw from the SPP scheme up to 100% of the resources accumulated over the years on individual pension accounts, are a vivid confirmation of the hypothesis put forward at the beginning that the influence of “black swans” on human behaviour, may lead to the complete annihilation of resources accumulated with rational justification, intended for retirement purposes.
To improve the sustainability and effectiveness of Peru’s pension system, the following key policy measures are recommended:
Diversify funding sources beyond employee contributions.
Gradually raise the retirement age in line with increasing life expectancy.
Establish a stabilization fund to cushion the impact of economic crises.
Introduce incentives for formal employment and participation in pension schemes.
Implement flexible contribution options for informal workers.
Apply automatic enrollment with an opt-out option to increase participation rates.
Adjust the minimum pension to reflect the cost of living.
Expand non-contributory pensions for vulnerable groups.
Address gender disparities through credits for caregiving periods.
Strengthen oversight of pension fund administrators (AFPs).
Promote financial literacy to support informed retirement planning.
These measures aim to create a more inclusive, resilient, and financially stable pension system capable of adapting to future economic and demographic challenges.
Szumlicz Tadeusz,
Muszalski Wojciech,
Poteraj Jarosław, ‘Metoda ubezpieczeniowa w zarządzaniu ryzykiem starości’ (2011) in:
Poteraj Jarosław, ‘Wykorzystanie metody ubezpieczeniowej w systemie emerytalnym Austrii’ (2013), in:
Stańko Dariusz, ‘Doświadczenia we wprowadzaniu wielofunduszowości w innych krajach’ (2010a), in:
Stańko Dariusz, ‘Transfery członków kapitałowych funduszy emerytalnych na świecie i w Polsce. Analiza racjonalności decyzji członków OFE’ (2010b), „Rozprawy Ubezpieczeniowe” Zeszyt 8(1/2010) 7–36.
The new sol has been the monetary unit of Peru since 1991. Before the currency reform in 1991, the monetary unit was the
Abbreviation according to the ISO 4217 standard. On February 26, 2024, 1 EUR was worth PEN 4.1216, and in Poland on February 26, 2024, 1 PEN was worth PLN 1,0560. Compare: Bloomberg
CIA
TWBI
countryeconomy.com
This program was originally intended to cover only public employees who started their administrative careers before 1962. It was supposed to end with the 1973 reform, but instead of disappearing, it became a special public pension scheme for the following groups of employees: teachers who started working before 1980, employees of state-owned companies and judges. Nowadays, it covers retirement (with a contribution of 13% of remuneration for at least 15 years for men and 12.5 years for women), disability, widowhood, orphanage, and also offers a pension even for parents dependent on deceased employees. Compare: Lavigne Milena,
Lavigne (n 18) 7.
Decreto Ley N° 19990 (1973), 30 de abril de 1973
Estado Peruano
Lavigne (n 18) 7.
Ramos Jorge, ‘Dual system in Peru still finding its feet’, Global Pensions February 2005.
Under these provisions, certain government retirees, including former legislators, were entitled to a fully indexed lifetime pension equal to the current salary of a current official in the position held by the retiree. After the retiree’s death, the spouse and unmarried daughters continued to receive the same benefit.
Bernal Noelia, Muñoz Angel, Perea Hugo, Tejada Johanna, Tuesta David, ‘A look at the Peruvian Pension System: Diagnosis and Proposals’, (BBVA 2008) Pension Studies Series, 33.
Queisser Monika, ‘Pension Reform and Private Pension Funds in Peru and Colombia’, The World Bank, Policy Research, Working Paper 1853, Financial Sector Development Department, November 1997, 1.
At the end of 1993, these AFPs were: Integra, Profuturo, Horizonte, Unión, Nueva Vida, El Roble, Providencia and Megafondo. Already in 1994, AFP Megafondo (merged with Horizonte in August 1994) and AFP Providencia (merged with Nueva Vida in November 1994) were liquidated. In 1996, AFP El Roble was liquidated (merged with Profuturo in September 1996). In 2000, after the merger of AFP Unión and AFP Nueva Vida, AFP Unión Vida was created. In 2005, AFP Prima was established. In 2006, AFP Unión Vida was liquidated. In 2013, AFP Horizonte was liquidated, and AFP Habitat appeared on the market.
Queisser (n 30) 1.
Queisser (n 30) 3.
In Chile they had an interest rate of 4%.
TWB, ‘Peru’s Private Pension System: An Analysis of its Evolution, Current Market Structure and Recommendations for Reform’, The World Bank, Finance, Private Sector and Infrastructure Department, Latin America and the Caribbean Region, July 2003, 15.
Bernal (n 28) 33.
Queisser (n 30) 20.
SSA International Update
Queisser (n 30) 3.
Bernal (n 28) 33.
A Li Carmen, Olivera Javier, ‘Participation in the Peruvian reformed pension system’ (2005) access at:
TWB (n 35) 2.
Lavigne (n 18) 15.
TWB (n 35) 15.
TWB (n 35) 2.
TWB (n 35) 8 & 9.
Moròn Eduardo, ‘The Peruvian Pension Reform’, (2007) Documento de Discusiòn DD 07/04, Centro de Investigaciòn de la Universidad del Pacifico, 4.
Bernal (n 28) 33.
The average exposure of this type of funds in particular types of financial instruments was then: 21% in government bonds, 7.5% in shares, 11% in private sector bonds, 28% in the financial sector and 8.5% in foreign securities.
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
Bernal (n 28) 106.
SSA International Update
This was 1.5% of an employee’s earnings, compared with 2.27% for the average fee charged by other AFPs in July 2005.
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
Bernal (n 28) 31 & 32.
SSA International Update
LiP, ‘Poverty Decreases in Peru but Still Affects One Third of Population’ Living in Peru, May 19, 2011.
Moròn (n 48) 8.
Bernal (n 28) 27.
Bernal (n 28) 33.
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
Olivera Javier, Zuluaga Blanca, ‘The effects of non-contributory pensions in Colombia and Peru’ (2013), access at:
SSA International Update
This pension amounts to PEN 250 and is paid once every two months. Nowadays, it is a component of social assistance, dependent on the beneficiary’s income, but also paid to people of retirement age.
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
You can read more about the details of activities related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru in the context of pension issues in the dissertation Ponce Arnillas Luis Alberto Max,
SSA International Update
At that time, it was equivalent to 1 Reference Tax Unit (UIT).
SSA International Update
SSA International Update
Previously, only women could receive a pension at the age of 50 by paying at least 25 years of contributions; men had to wait until age 55 and have at least 30 years of contributions to take early retirement unless they qualified for a special early retirement pension.
Previously, the reference salary formula varied depending on the insured person’s date of birth and years of contributions.
Previously, an SNP member had to pay at least 20 years of contributions to qualify for a partial pension.
Previously, SNP pensioners could only work if their monthly earnings did not exceed half of the Reference Tax Unit (UIT - 1 UIT is currently PEN 5,150). Compare: Estado Peruano
SSA International Update
Lavigne (n 18) 14.
Estado Peruano
Estado Peruano
ANDINA
They were AFPs: Integra, Profuturo, Habitat & Profuturo. Compare: AAFPa,
INEI, ‘Situación de la Población Adulta Mayor’ (Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática 2022), access at:
Ramos (n 26).
TGE,
FRED,
AAFPb,
Mesa-Lago Carmelo, ‘Suggestions for Pension Re-Reform in Peru’, Centro de Investigación de la Universidad del Pacífico, Apuntes 78, First Semester 2016.
Ramos (n 26).
Already in 2005, it was estimated that the average SPP pension was 75% higher than the SNP benefit with the same parameters in terms of participation time. Compare: Ramos (n 26).
INEI (n 100).
Poblete Miranda Hernán,