The Crime Control Model of Vietnam’s Criminal Justice System: the Vital Role of Prosecutors and the Need for Plea Bargaining

[1] Aviram, H. (2011). Packer in context: Formalism and fairness in the due process model. Law & Social Inquiry, 36(1), 237-261. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011876 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bishop, J., & Osler, M. (2015). Prosecutors and victims: Why wrongful convictions matter. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 105(4), 1031-1047. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26402743 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Brown, D. K. (2019). The case for a trial fee: What money can buy in criminal process. California Law Review, 107(5), 1415-1454. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26870221 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Dinh, T. H. (2020). Về tố tụng công bằng trong cải cách tư pháp ở Việt Nam hiện nay [On due process in judicial reform in Vietnam Today]. In Continuing to Promote Judicial Reform in Vietnam: Theoretical and Practical Issues [Symposium]. Graduate Academy of Social Sciences & Hanoi Open University Search in Google Scholar

[5] Garoupa, N., & Stephen, F. H. (2008). Why plea-bargaining fails to achieve results in so many criminal justice systems: A new framework for assessment. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 15(3), 323-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X0801500303 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Giannoulopoulos, D. (2013). Custodial legal assistance and notification of the right to silence in France: Legal cosmopolitanism and local resistance. Criminal Law Forum, 24(3), 291-329. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/crimlfm24&i=291 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Griffiths, J. (1970). Ideology in criminal procedure or A third ‘model’ of the criminal process. Yale Law Journal, 79(3), 359-417. https://doi.org/10.2307/795141 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Johnson, M. (2022). Consequences of plea bargaining: In consideration of the rights of the accused. Columbia Undergraduate Law Review. https://www.culawreview.org/journal/consequences-of-plea-bargaining-in-consideration-of-the-rights-of-the-accused Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kubrin, C. E., & Tublitz, R. (2022). How to think about criminal justice reform: Conceptual and practical considerations. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(6), 1050–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09712-6 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Langer, M., & Sklansky, D. A. (2017). Introduction. In D. A. Sklansky & M. Langer (Eds.), Prosecutors and democracy: A cross-national study (pp. vii-viii). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941461.001 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Le, H. T. D. (2018). Chế định mặc cả nhận tội theo pháp luật tố tụng hình sự Hoa Kỳ và kinh nghiệm cho Việt Nam [The plea-bargaining system in U.S. criminal procedure law and lessons for Vietnam]. Legal Sciences Journal, 5(117), 45-53 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Le, L. C. (2018). Role of the court in protecting human rights in crime-control model, according to the Criminal Procedure Code of 2015. VNU Journal of Science: Legal Studies, 34(1), 1–7, https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1167/vnuls.4139 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Lu, H., Shuai, H., Li, Y., Liu, J., & Liang, B. (2022). Confession and the crime control model: An analysis of exonerated death penalty cases in China. Special issue on wrongful convictions and exonerations in Asia. Asian Journal of Criminology, 17(Supplement 1), S33-S54. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/asjrcrm17&i=502 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ngoc, S. B. (2022). Vietnam’s mixed constitution and human rights. The Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 16(2), 295-319. https://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2022-2007 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Nguyen, D. H. (2016). Tiếp cận tính cộng đồng: Những bàn luận và nghiên cứu về tính cộng đồng ở Việt Nam [Approaching community: Discussions and research on community in Vietnam]. Journal of Social Science Information, (7), 35-41 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Nguyen, H. Y. (2019). Cơ chế thỏa thuận hợp tác trong tố tụng hình sự Hoa Kỳ [Cooperation agreement mechanisms in U.S. criminal procedure]. Procuratorate Journal, (24), 50-55 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Nguyen, T. D. (2016). Thương lượng nhận tội trong Tố tụng hình sự - Kinh nghiệm quốc tế và gợi mở cho pháp luật Việt Nam [Plea bargaining in criminal procedure – International experiences and insights for Vietnamese law]. State and Law Review, (2), 43-47 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Packer, H. L. (1964). Two models of the criminal process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 113(1), 1–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/3310562 Search in Google Scholar

[19] Sklansky, D. A. (2016). The nature and function of prosecutorial power. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 106(3), 473-520. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26404025 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Turner, J. I. (2012). Prosecutors and bargaining in weak cases: A comparative view. In E. Luna & M. Wade (Eds.), The prosecutor in transnational perspective. Oxford University Press. https://scholar.smu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1312&context=law_faculty Search in Google Scholar

[21] Vo, M. K., & Nguyen, P. A. (2023). Áp dụng thỏa thuận nhận tội vào Việt Nam: Thuận lợi và thách thức [Implementing plea bargaining in Vietnam: advantages and challenges]. Democracy and Law Review, Special Issue on Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law Search in Google Scholar