[
Baron, N. S. 1998. ‘Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email’ in Language andCommunication, 18, pp. 133-170.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bergs, A. 2006. ‘Analyzing Online Communication from a Social Network Point of View: Questions, Problems, Perspectives‘ in Language@internet, Dipp NRW, 4. Available: http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2006 [2010, December 26].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bunz, U. and S. W. Campbell. 2002. ‘Accomodating Politeness Indicators in Personal Electronic Mail Messages.’ Available: http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~bunz/ AOIR2002politeness.pdf [2010, December 26].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cordella, M. 2004. The dynamic consultation: a discourse analytical study of doctor-patient communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.128
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guido, M. 2006. ‘The Discourse of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Specialized-Genre Conventions vs. West-African Refugees’ Narrative Representations’ in Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Contexts. M. Gotti e F. Salager-Meyer (eds). Berna: Peter Lang (“Linguistic Insights”), pp. 183-207.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harvey K. et al. 2008. ‘Health communication and adolescents: what do their emails tell us?’ in Family Practice 25/4, pp. 304-311.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herring, S. C. 1996. ‘Two variants of an electronic message schema’ in Computer-Mediated Communication:Linguistic, Social and Cross Cultural Perspectives. S.C. Herring (ed). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 81-106.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herring, S.C. 1999. ‘Interactional coherence in CMC.’ in Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4/4. Available: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html [2010, December 26].10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00106.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herring, S. C. 2004. ‘Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computer-mediated communication’ in NewMedia & Society, 6/1, pp 26-36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herring, S. C. 2001. ‘Computer-Mediated Discourse’ in Handbook of Discourse Analysis. D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin &H.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hamilton. Oxford: Blackwell (eds), pp 612-634.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herring, S. C. 1999. ‘Interactional Coherence in CMC’ in Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4/4. Available: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/ herring.html [2010, December 26].10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00106.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leimeister J. M. and H. Krcmar. 2005. ‘Evaluation of a systematic design for a virtual patient community’ in Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10/4, article 6. Available: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/leimeister.html [2010, December 26].10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00269.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kranich, S. 2009. ‘Epistemic modality in English popular scientific texts and their German translations’ in Transkom 2/1, pp. 26-41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maynor, N. 1994. ‘The language of electronic mail: Written speech?’ in Centennial usage studies. American DialectSociety. G. Little and M. Montgomery (eds.), 78, pp. 48-54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perez-Sabater, E. Turney and B. Montero-Fleta. 2008. ‘Orality and literacy, formality and informality in email communication’ in Ibérica, 15, pp.71-88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Posteguillo, S. 2003. Netlin- guistics. Castelló: Universitat Jaume I.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Radić-Bojanić, B. 2006. ‘Fragmentation/integration and involvement/detachment in chatroom discourse’ in SkaseJournal of Theoretical Linguistics, 3/1. Available: http://www.skase.sk/Volumes/JTL05/4.pdf [2008, November 11].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ribeiro, B.T. 2002. ‘Erotic strategies in powerless women: analyzing psychiatric interviews’ in Gender identity anddiscourse analysis. Sunderland, J. & Litosseliti, L. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 193-219.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stein, D. 2006. ‘The Website as a Domain-Specific Genre’, in Language@internet‘, Dipp NRW, 4. Available: http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2006 [2010, December 26].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
]Search in Google Scholar
