[1. European Commission (2001). White Paper "European Transport Policy for 2010: time to decide” (CEC, 2001).]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Adamos, G. & Nathanail, E. (2011). An experimental approach towards the evaluation of mass media safety campaigns - A comparative analysis of two case studies. In Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, January 23-27, 2011 (Paper Number 11-3698). Washington DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Delhomme, P., De Dobbeleer, W., Forward, S., & Simões, A., Adamos, G., Areal, A., Chappe, J., Eyssartier, C., Loukopoulos, P., Nathanail, T., Nordbakke, S., Peters, H., Phillips, R., Pinto, M., Ranucci, M. F, Sardi, G. M., Trigoso, J., Vaa, T., Veisten, K., Walter, E. (2009). Manual forDesigning, Implementing, and Evaluating Road Safety Communication Campaigns. Cast Project. Brussels, Belgium: Belgian Road Safety Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. SafetyNet. (2009). Fatigue. Retrieved July, 27, 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/specialist/knowledge/pdf/fatigue.pdf. Boulanger Ankatrien, Daniels Stijn, Delhomme Patricia, Deugnier Marion, Divjak Marko, Eyssartier Chloé, Hels Tove, Moan Inger Synnøve, Nathanail Teti, Orozova-Bekkevold Ivanka, Ranucci Marie-Frederique, Schepers Paul, Van den Bossche Filip & Zabukovec Vlast. (2007). Deliverable 2.2 Comparison of research designs. CAST Project. Brussels, Belgium: CAST Consortium.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Centre for Transportation Research and Education (CTRE). (2002). Communicating Highway Safety:What Works. CTRE Project 01-85. Iowa, USA: Iowa State University.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Robson, S. L. (2001). Guide to evaluating the effectiveness of strategies for preventing work injuries. Retrieved July 23, 2008, from http://www.monash.edu.au /muarc/IPSO/safebk/safetybk.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. MacDonald, G., Starr, G., Schooley, M., Yee, S. L., Klimowski, K. & Turner, K. (2001). Introductionto program evaluation for comprehensive tobacco control programs. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Boulanger, A., Daniels, S., Divjak, M., Goncalves, I., Meng, A., Moan, I., Nathanail, E., Orozova- Bekkevold, I., Schepers, P., Tamis, K., Van den Bossche, F. & Zabukovec, V. (2009). Evaluationtool for road safety campaigns. CAST EU FP6 project, Brussels: BIVV.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Elliott, B. (1989). Effective road safety campaigns: a practical handbook (Report CR80). Canberra: Department of Transport and Communications.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Frechtling, J. (2002). The 2002 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation. Arlington, USA: The National Science Foundation. CDC. (2001). Program Evaluation, Program Operations Guidelines for ST Prevention. Atlanta, USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Delhomme, P., Vaa, T., Meyer, T., Harland, G., Goldenberg, C., Jarmark, S., Christie, N., Rehnova, V. (1999). Evaluated road safety media campaigns: an overview of 265 evaluated campaigns and somemeta-analysis on accidents. EU GADGET project. Arcueil: INRETS/RR-00-006-FR.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Vaa, T, Assum, T., Ulleberg, P., & Veisten, K. (2004). Effects of information on behaviour and roadaccidents: Conditions, evaluation and cost-effectiveness. (TØI-report 727/2004). Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Elvik, R., & Vaa, T. (2004). The handbook of road safety measures. Oxford: Elsevier Science, Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Phillips, R., Ulleberg, P. & Vaa, T. (2011). Meta-analysis of the effect of road safety campaigns on accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, 1204-1218.10.1016/j.aap.2011.01.002]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Woolley, J. E. (2001). Literature review on best practice with mass media. Adelaide:. Transport Systems Centre, University of South Australia.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Adamos, G., Ausserer, K., Brijs, K., Brijs, T., Daniels, S., Divjak, M., Haupt, J., Krol, B., Malasek, J., Nathanail, T., Phillips, R. O., Risser, R., Tamis, K., Ullberg, P., Vaa, T., Zabukovec, V. (2009). A theoretical approach to assess road safety campaigns. In S. Forward & A. Kazemi (Eds.), Evidence from seven European countries. CAST project. Brussels, Belgium: Belgian Road Safety Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses, 50, 179-211.10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Delaney, A. Lough, B., Whelan, M. & Cameron, M. (2004). Review of mass media campaigns inroad safety (No. 220). Clayton, Victoria: Monash University Accident Research Centre.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Wundersitz, L. N., Hutchinson, T. P. & Woolley, J. E. (2010). Best practice in road safety massmedia campaigns: A literature review. Adelaide: Centre for Automotive Safety Research, University of Australia.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Stead, M. & Eadie, D. (2007). Evaluation of Foolsspeed Campaign Final Phase - Report - TransportResearch Series. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Şimşekoğlu, Ö. & Lajunen, T. (2008). Social psychology of seat belt use: A comparison of Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic psychology andBehavior, 11, 181-191.10.1016/j.trf.2007.10.001]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Rosenstock, I. M. (1996). Why people use health services. Millbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44, 94-127.10.2307/3348967]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Prochaska, J. O. & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking. Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 390-395.10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Boulanger, A., Daniels, S., Delhomme, P., Deugnier, M., Divjak, M., Eyssartier, C., Hels, T., Synnøve Moan, I., Nathanail, T., Orozova-Bekkevold, I., Ranucci, M.-F., Schepers, P., Van den Bossche, F., & Zabukovec, V. (2007). Campaigns and awareness-raising strategies in traffic safety. Deliverable 2.2: Comparison of research designs. Brussels, Belgium: Belgian Road Safety Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Ajzen, I. (2002). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations. Retrieved July, 27, 2012, from http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Logan, T. K., Padgett, D. K., Thyer, B. A. & Royse, D. (2006). Program evaluation: an introduction. Belmont, California: Thomson Brooks/Cole.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Siegel, S. & Castellan, J. (1988). Non parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw - Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
