Is Logic in the Mind or in the World? Why a Philosophical Question can Affect the Understanding of Intelligence

Ayer, A. J. 1956. The problem of knowlegde. Penguin Books, London.Search in Google Scholar

Barber, M. 2009. Holism and Horizon: Husserl and McDowell on Non-conceptual Content. Husserl Stud. 25:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10743-008-9035-5.10.1007/s10743-008-9035-5Search in Google Scholar

Batterman, R. 2009. On the Explanatory Role of Mathematics in Empirical Science. British J. Philosophy of Science 1-25. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axp018.10.1093/bjps/axp018Search in Google Scholar

Benferhat, S. 2010. Interventions and belief cange in possibilistic graphical models. Artificial Intelligence 174(2):177-189.10.1016/j.artint.2009.11.012Search in Google Scholar

Broonen, J.-P. 2010. Volition and the Theora of Planned Behaviour: How to Fill the Gap Between Intention and Performance? In Dubois, D., ed., Computing Anticipatory Systems, volume 1303, 315-323. CASYS'09 Ninth International Conference.10.1063/1.3527169Search in Google Scholar

Canestri, J. 2012. Sprache, Neurowissenschaft und Psychoanalyse. Forum Psychoanalyse. DOI:10.1007/s00451-011-0092-6.10.1007/s00451-011-0092-6Search in Google Scholar

Chandrasekharan, S. 2009. Building to Discover: A Common Coding Model. Cognitive Science 33:1059-1086.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01050.x21585496Search in Google Scholar

Chater, N. 2008. Rational and Mechanistic Perspectives on Reinforcement Learning. Cognition. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.014.10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.01418722597Search in Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. 2007. Why Heideggerian AI Failed and how Fixing it would Require making it more Heideggerian. Artificial Intelligenc 171(18):1137-1160.10.1016/j.artint.2007.10.012Search in Google Scholar

Dürrbaum, A.; Scherm, W.; and Sommer, H. 2008. Systemidentifikation mittels Glaubenskalkül. Automatisierungstechnik 7:350-356.10.1524/auto.2008.0716Search in Google Scholar

Erdinast-Vulcan, D. 2007. That Which ‘Has No Name in Philosophy’: Merleau-Ponty and the Language of Literature. Hum. Stud. 30:395-409. doi: 10.1007/s10746-007-9069-2.10.1007/s10746-007-9069-2Search in Google Scholar

Froese, T., and Ziemke, T. 2009. Enactive Artificial Intelligence: Investigating the Systematic Organization of Life and Mind. Artificial Intelligence 173(3-4):466-500.10.1016/j.artint.2008.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Goertzel, B., and Pennachin, C. 2007. Artificial general intelligence. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-68677-4Search in Google Scholar

Hajicek, P., and Tolar, J. 2009. Intrinsic Properties of Quantum Systems. Found. Phys. doi: 10.1007/s10701-009-9296-7.10.1007/s10701-009-9296-7Search in Google Scholar

Hartimo, M. 2011. Husserl's Pluralistic Phenomenology of Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica. DOI:10.1093phimat/nkr032.Search in Google Scholar

Hernandez-Grallo, J., and Dowe, D. 2010. Measuring Universal Intelligence: Towards an Anytime Intelligence Test. Artificial Intelligence. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.006.10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.006Search in Google Scholar

Herzenberg, C. 2008. Grete Hermann: An early contributor to Quantum Theory. arXiv: 0812.3986[quant-ph].Search in Google Scholar

Hilbert, D. 1964. Hilbertiana, fünf Aufsätze. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftl. Buchgesellschaft.Search in Google Scholar

Hopp, W. 2009. Phenomenology and Fallibility. Husserl Stud. 25:1-14.10.1007/s10743-008-9053-3Search in Google Scholar

Hornberger, K. 2009. Introduction to Decoherence Theory. Lect. Notes Phys. 768:223-278.10.1007/978-3-540-88169-8_5Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, E. 1913. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und einer phänomenologischen Philosophie. Hamburg: Meiner.Search in Google Scholar

Hutter, M. 2009a. Open Problems in Universal Induction and Intelligence. arXiv: 0907.0746v1[cs.AI]4July2009.Search in Google Scholar

Hutter, M. 2009b. Feature Reinforcement Learning: Part I. Unstructured MDPs. J. Artificial General Intelligence 1:3-24.10.2478/v10229-011-0002-8Search in Google Scholar

Kosowski, L. 2012. The structure of noema in the process of objectivation. Husserl Stud. doi: 10.1007/s10743-012-9102-9.10.1007/s10743-012-9102-9Search in Google Scholar

Kuusela, M.; Vatanen, T.; Malmi, E.; Raiko, T.; Aaltonen, T.; and Nagai, Y. 2011. Semi-supervised anomaly detection - towards model independent searches of new physics. arXiv: 1102.3329v1[physics.data-an] 14 Dec 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Legg, S., and Hutter, M. 2007. Universal Intelligence: A Definition of Machine Intelligence. Minds and Machines 17(4):391-444.10.1007/s11023-007-9079-xSearch in Google Scholar

Leitgeb, H., and Ladyman, J. 2008. Criteria of Identity and Structuralist Ontology. Philosophia Mathematica III(16):388-396.10.1093/philmat/nkm039Search in Google Scholar

Macbeth, D. 2011. Seeing how it goes: Paper-and-pencil reasoning in mathematical practice. Philosophia Mathematica. DOI:10.1093phimat/nkr006.Search in Google Scholar

Maddy, P. 2007. Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273669.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mittelstaedt, P. 2011. The problem of interpretation of modern physics. Foundation of Physics. DOI:10.1007/10701-011-9571-2.Search in Google Scholar

Moran, D. 2008. Husserl's Transcendental Philosophy and the Critique of Naturalism. Cont. Philos. Rev. doi: 10.1007/s11007-008-9088-3.10.1007/s11007-008-9088-3Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, J. L. 2006. Against Optimality: Logical Foundations for Decision-Task Planning in Autonomous Agents. Computational Intelligence 20(1):1-25.10.1111/j.1467-8640.2006.00271.xSearch in Google Scholar

Schlosshauer, M. 2008. Classicality, the Ensemble Interpretation, and Decoherence: Resolving the Hyperion Dispute. Found. Phys. doi: 10.1007/s10701-008-9237-x.10.1007/s10701-008-9237-xSearch in Google Scholar

Schmid, U., and Kitzelmann, E. 2011. Inductive rule learning on the knowledge level.10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Schreiber, L., and Sommer, H. 2010. Can Mathematics be Justified by Natural Logic? In Dubois, D., ed., Computing Anticipatory Systems, volume 1303, 189-198. CASYS'09 Ninth International Conference.10.1063/1.3527155Search in Google Scholar

Sher, G. 2010. Is logic in the mind or in the world? Synthese. doi: 10.1007/S11229-010-9796-1.10.1007/s11229-010-9796-1Search in Google Scholar

Sommer, H. 2009. Emergence of Classical Reality From a Quantum Mechanical Background. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 39:1027-1036.10.1016/j.chaos.2007.04.002Search in Google Scholar

Srivastava, S.; Immerman, N.; and Zilberstein, S. 2010. A New Representation and Associated Algorithms for Generalized Planning. Artificial Intelligence. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2010.10.006.10.1016/j.artint.2010.10.006Search in Google Scholar

Stenlund, S. 2010. Different senses of finitude: An inquiry into Hilbert's finitism. Synthese. doi: 10.1007/S11229-010-9823-2.10.1007/s11229-010-9823-2Search in Google Scholar

Stuckey, W.; Silberstein, M.; and Cifone, M. 2009. Reconciling Spacetime and the Quantum: Relational Blockworld and the Quantum Liar Paradox. Found. Phys. 38:348-383. doi: 10.1007/s10701-008-9206-4.10.1007/s10701-008-9206-4Search in Google Scholar

Symons, J. 2008. Computational Models of Emergent Properties. Minds and Machines. doi: 10.1007/s11023-008-9120-8.10.1007/s11023-008-9120-8Search in Google Scholar

Tarrazo, M. 2004. Schopenhauer's prolegomenon to fuzziness. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 3:227-254.10.1023/B:FODM.0000036865.03250.2bSearch in Google Scholar

Tversky, A., and Kahnemann, D. 1983. Extension versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probabiliy judgment. Psychological Review 90(4):293-315.10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293Search in Google Scholar

Veness, J.; Ng, K.; Hutter, M.; and Silver, D. 2009. A Monte Carlo AIXI Approximation. arXiv: 0909.0801v1[cs.AI]4Sep, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, P. 1994. From inheritance relations to nonaxiomatic logic. Int. J. of approximate Reasoning 11:281-319.10.1016/0888-613X(94)90021-3Search in Google Scholar

Wang, P. 2007. Three Fundamental Misconceptions of Artificial Intelligence. J. Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 19(3):249-268.10.1080/09528130601143109Search in Google Scholar

Wang, P. 2009. Formalization of Evidence: Comparative Study. J. Artificial General Intelligence 1:25-53.10.2478/v10229-011-0003-7Search in Google Scholar

Wang, P. 2011. From NARS to a thinking machine. http://www.cis.temple.edu/~pwang/Search in Google Scholar

Weyl, H. 1968. Gesammelte Werke, volume 3. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer. chapter The Gost of Modality, 684-709.Search in Google Scholar

Yager, R. 1994. Aggregation operators and fuzzy systems modeling. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 67(2):129-145.10.1016/0165-0114(94)90082-5Search in Google Scholar

Zeh, H. 1999. The Meaning of Decoherence. arXiv: quant-ph/9905004v2 29.6.1999.Search in Google Scholar

Zuh, D. 2011. Wogegen wandte sich Husserl 1891? Husserl Stud. doi: 10.1007/s10743-11-9100-3.Search in Google Scholar

Zurek, W. 1998. Relative States and the Environment: Einselection, and the Existential Interpretation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 356:1793-1821. arXiv: [quant-ph]9805065.10.1098/rsta.1998.0250Search in Google Scholar

Zurek, W. 2007. Relative States and the Environment: Einselection, Envariance, Quantum Darwinismus, and the Existential Interpretation. arXiv: 0707.2832v1[quant-ph]19.7.2007.Search in Google Scholar