[Alexander, W. P., and Grimshaw, S. D. 1996. Treed regression. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. 5: 156-175.10.1080/10618600.1996.10474702]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, J. R. 2007. How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195324259.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Bush, R. and Mosteller, F. 1955. Stochastic Models for Learning. John Wiley & Sons, New York.10.1037/14496-000]Search in Google Scholar
[Dutt, V., and Gonzalez, C. 2007. Slope of inflow impacts dynamic decision making. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society (pp. 79). Boston, MA: System Dynamics Society.]Search in Google Scholar
[Estes, W. K. 2002. Traps in the route to models of memory and decision. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(1), 3-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Friedman, J. 1991. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. The Annals of Statistics. 19: 1-141.10.1214/aos/1176347963]Search in Google Scholar
[Gluck, K. A., Scheutz, M., Gunzelmann, G., Harris, J., and Kershner, J. 2007. Combinatorics meets processing power: Large-scale computational resources for BRIMS. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation, 73-83, Orlando, FL: Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonzalez, C., and Dutt, V. 2007. Learning to control a dynamic task: A system dynamics cognitive model of the slope effect. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, 61-66. Ann Arbor, MI.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halbrügge, M. in press. Keep it simple - A case study of model development in the context of the Dynamic Stock and Flows (DSF) task. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kase, S.E., Ritter, F.E., and Schoelles, M. 2007. Using HPC and PGAs to optimize noisy computational models of cognition. In Innovations and Advanced Techniques in Systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kintsch, W., Healy, A. F., Hegarty, M., Pennington, B. F., Salthouse, T. 1999. Models of working memory: Eight questions and some general issues. In A. Miyake and P. Shah (Eds.) Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. (pp. 412-441). New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174909.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Knofcyznski, G. T., and Mundfrom, D. 2008. Sample sizes when using multiple linear regression for prediction. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 68:431-442.10.1177/0013164407310131]Search in Google Scholar
[Langley, P., Laird, J. E., and Rogers, S. 2008. Cognitive architectures: Research issues and challenges. Cognitive Systems Research, 10(2), 141-160.]Search in Google Scholar
[McClelland, J. L. 2009. The place of modeling in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 11-38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moore, L. R. 2010. Cognitive Model Exploration and Optimization: A New Challenge for Computational Science. In T. Jastrzembski (Ed.), Proceedings of the 19th Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (BRIMS) Conference. Charleston, SC.10.21236/ADA539438]Search in Google Scholar
[Moore, L. R., Kopala, M., Mielke, T., Krusmark, M., and Gluck, K. A. (2010). Simultaneous Performance Exploration and Optimized Search with Volunteer Computing. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC). Chicago, IL.10.1145/1851476.1851518]Search in Google Scholar
[Pew, R. W., Gluck, K. A., and Deutsch, S. 2005. Accomplishments, challenges, and future directions for human behavior representation. In K. A. Gluck and R. W. Pew (Eds.) Modeling human behavior with integrated cognitive architectures: Comparison, evaluation, and validation (pp. 397-414). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reitter, D. In press. Metacognition and multiple strategies in a cognitive model of online control. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rescorla, R. A., and Wagner, A. R. 1972. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black and W. F. Prokasy (Eds.) Classical conditioning II. Current research and theory, 64-99. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallach, D., and Lebiere, C. 2003. Conscious and unconscious knowledge: Mapping to the symbolic and subsymbolic levels of a hybrid architecture. In Jimenez, L. (Ed.) Attention and Implicit Learning. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
