Central Auditory Processing Disorders: Effects of Age and Hearing Loss to Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses

Anderer P, Semlitsch HV, Saletu B. Multichannel auditory event-related brain potentials: effects of normal aging on the scalp distribution of N1, P2, N2 and P300 latencies and amplitudes // Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1996; 99:458-47210.1016/S0013-4694(96)96518-9Search in Google Scholar

Baran JA, Musiek FE. Behavioral assesment of the central auditory nervous system // In: Musiek F. E., Rintelmann (Eds). Contemporary perspectives in hearing assesment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1999; 375-413Search in Google Scholar

Gelfand SA. Optimizing the reliability of speech recognition scores // J Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1998; 41:1088-110210.1044/jslhr.4105.10889771631Search in Google Scholar

Golding M, Mitchell P, Cupples L. Risk markers for the garded severity of auditory processing abnormality in an older Australian population: The Blue Mountains hearing study // J Am Acad Audiol, 2005; 16:348-35610.3766/jaaa.16.6.316178406Search in Google Scholar

Humes LE. Do ‘auditory processing’ tests measure auditory processing in the elderly? // Ear and Hearing, 2005; 26:109-11910.1097/00003446-200504000-0000115809539Search in Google Scholar

Humes LE. Speech understanding in the elderly // J Am Acad Audiol, 1996; 7:161-167Search in Google Scholar

Jasper HH. The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation // Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1958; 10:371-375Search in Google Scholar

Jerger J, Silman S, Lew H, Chmiel R. Case studied in binaural interference: Converging evidence from behavioral and electrophysiological measures // J Am Acad Audiol, 1993; 4:122-131Search in Google Scholar

Kimura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli // Can J Psychol, 1961b;15:166-17110.1037/h0083219Search in Google Scholar

Kimura D. Some effects of temporal lobe damage on auditory perception // Can J Psychol, 1961a;15: 156-16510.1037/h008321813756014Search in Google Scholar

Martin BA, Treblay KL, Korczak P. Speech evoked potentials: from the laboratory to the clinic // Ear and Hearing, 2008; 29(3):285-31310.1097/AUD.0b013e3181662c0e18453883Search in Google Scholar

Mueller V, Brehmer Y, Timo von Oertzen, Li S-C, Lindenberger U. Electrophysiological correlates of selective attention: A lifespan comparison // BMC Neurosci, 2008; 9:1810.1186/1471-2202-9-18227085518237433Search in Google Scholar

Musiek FE. Assesment of central auditory dysfunction: The dichotic digit test revisited // Ear and Hearing, 1983; 4:79-83.10.1097/00003446-198303000-000026840415Search in Google Scholar

Naatanen R, Paavilainen P, Rinne T, Alho K. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review // Clin Neurophysiol, 2007; 118:2544-259010.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.02617931964Search in Google Scholar

Naatanen R, Alho K. Mechanisms of attention as revealed by event-related potentials of the brain // In: Posner M. I. (Ed). Cognitive neuroscience of attention. New York: Guilford Press: 2004; 194-206Search in Google Scholar

Norris D, McQueen JM, Cutler A. Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition // J Exper Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 1995;21(5):1209-122810.1037/0278-7393.21.5.1209Search in Google Scholar

Picton TW, Stuss DT, Champagne SC, Nelson RF. The effects of age on human event-related potentials // Psychophysiol, 1984; 21:312-32510.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb02941.x6739673Search in Google Scholar

Plomp R, Mimpen AM. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences // Audiology, 1979; 18:43-5210.3109/00206097909072618760724Search in Google Scholar

Stadler W, Klimesch W, Pouthass V, Ragot R. Differential effects of the stimulus sequence on CNV and P300 // Brain Res, 2006; 1123:157-16710.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.04017081506Search in Google Scholar