Above-Ground Net Primary Productivity in Young Stands of Beech and Spruce

BOŠEĽA, M., PAJTÍK, J., KONÔPKA, B., ŠEBEŇ, V., VIDA, T., 2013: Modelling effects of weather condition on seasonal dynamics of the stem circumference increment in a mixed stand of Norway spruce and European beech. Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal, 59(3): 180-188.10.2478/v10114-011-0025-8Search in Google Scholar

BRUNNER, I., GODBOLD, D., 2007: Tree roots in a changing world. Journal of Forest Research. 12(2): 78-82.10.1007/s10310-006-0261-4Search in Google Scholar

CIENCIALA, E., ČERNÝ, M., APLTAUER, J., EXNEROVÁ, Z., 2005: Biomass functions applicable to European beech. Journal of Forest Science, 51(4): 147-154.10.17221/4553-JFSSearch in Google Scholar

CLAESSON, S., SAHLÉN, K., LUNDMARK, T., 2001: Functions for Biomass Estimation of Young Pinus sylvestris. Picea abies and Betula spp. from Stands in Northern Sweden with High Stand Densities. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16: 138-146.10.1080/028275801300088206Search in Google Scholar

DUTCA, I., ABRUDAN, I. V., STANCIOIU, P. T., BLUDJEA, V., 2010: Biomass Conversion and Expansion Factors for Young Norway Spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) Trees Planted on Non-Forest Lands in Eastern Carpathians. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 38(3): 286-292.Search in Google Scholar

ENQUIST, B. J., NIKLAS, K. J., 2002: Global Allocation Rules for Patterns of Biomass Partitioning in Seed Plants. Science, 295: 1517-1520.10.1126/science.106636011859193Search in Google Scholar

FEHRMANN, L., KLEINN, C. H., 2006: General considerations about the use of allometric equations for biomass estimation on the example of Norway spruce in Central Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 236: 412-421.10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.026Search in Google Scholar

GOULD, S. J., 1966: Allometry in size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biological Reviews, 41. 587-640.10.1111/j.1469-185X.1966.tb01624.x5342162Search in Google Scholar

HUXLEY, J., 1932: Problems of Relative Growth. Methuen. London.Search in Google Scholar

JANDL, R. et al., 2007: How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma, 137: 253-268.10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.003Search in Google Scholar

JANSSENS, I.A. et al., 2003: Europe‘s Terrestrial Biosphere Absorbs 7 to 12% of European Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions. Science, 300: 1538-1542.10.1126/science.108359212764201Search in Google Scholar

KONÔPKA, B., PAJTÍK, J., MORAVČÍK, M., LUKAC, M., 2010: Biomass partitioning and growth efficiency in four naturally regenerated forest tree species. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11: 234-243.10.1016/j.baae.2010.02.004Search in Google Scholar

KONÔPKA, B., PAJTÍK, J., NOGUCHI, K., LUKAC, M., 2013a: Replacing Norway spruce with European beech: A comparison of biomass and net primary production patterns in young stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 302, 185-192.10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.026Search in Google Scholar

KONÔPKA, B., PAJTÍK, J., ŠEBEŇ, V., BOŠEĽA, M., MÁLIŠ, F., PRIWITZER, T., PAVLENDA, P., 2013b: The Research Site Vrchslatina - an experimental design and the main aims. Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal, 59(3): 203-213.10.2478/v10114-011-0028-5Search in Google Scholar

KOZLOWSKI, T. T., PALLARDY, S. G., 1997: Physiology of Woody Plants. Academic Press, San Diego, 411 p.Search in Google Scholar

MARKLUND, L. G., 1987: Biomass functions for Norway spruce (Piceaabies [L.] Karst.) in Sweden. Dep. Forest Survey. Rep. 43. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea. 127 p.Search in Google Scholar

PAJTÍK, J., KONÔPKA, B., LUKAC, M., 2008: Biomass functions and expansion factors in young Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) trees. Forest Ecology and Management, 256: 1096-1103.10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.013Search in Google Scholar

PAJTÍK, J., KONÔPKA, B., LUKAC, M., 2011a: Individual biomass factors for beech, oak and pine in Slovakia: a comparative study in young naturally regenerated stands. Trees, 25: 277-288.10.1007/s00468-010-0504-zSearch in Google Scholar

PAJTÍK, J., KONÔPKA, B., PRIWITZER, T., 2011b: Alokácia dendromasy v mladých porastoch buka obyčajného a duba zimného. [Dendromass allocation in the young stands of European beech and Sessile oak.] Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 56: 291-300.Search in Google Scholar

PRIWITZER, T., PAJTÍK, J., KONÔPKA, B., IŠTOŇA, J., PAVLENDA, P., 2009: Alokácia uhlíka v lesnom ekosystéme - prípadové štúdie z mladých borových porastov. Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal, 55(3): 239-250.10.2478/v10114-009-0007-2Search in Google Scholar

POORTER, H., NIKLAS, K. J., REICH, P. B., OLEKSYN, J., POOT, P., MOMMER, L., 2011: Biomass allocation to leaves. stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist, 193, 30-50.10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x22085245Search in Google Scholar

SEIDL, R., RAMMER, W., BELLOS, P., HOCHBICHLER, E., LEXER, M. J., 2010: Testing generalized allometries in allocation modeling within an individual-based simulation framework. Trees, 24: 139-150.10.1007/s00468-009-0387-zSearch in Google Scholar

SLOT, M., JANSE-TEN KLOOSTER, S. H., STERCK, F. J., SASS-KLAASSEN, U., YWAIFEL, R., 2012: A lifetime perspective of biomass allocation in Quercus pubescens trees in a dry. alpine valley. Trees, 26. 1661-1668.10.1007/s00468-012-0717-4Search in Google Scholar

SIX, J. et al., 2002: Measuring and understanding carbon storage in afforested soils by physical fractionation. Soil Science Society America Journal, 66: 1981-1987.10.2136/sssaj2002.1981Search in Google Scholar

WEST, P. W., 2010: Tree and Forest Measurement. Springer, Dordrecht, 191 p.10.1007/978-3-540-95966-3Search in Google Scholar

WIRTH, C., SCHUMACHER, J., SCHULZE, E. D., 2004: Generic biomass functions for Norway spruce in Central Europe - a meta-analysis approach towards prediction and uncertainty estimation. Tree Physiology, 24: 121-139.10.1093/treephys/24.2.12114676030Search in Google Scholar

YUSTE, J. C., KONÔPKA, B., JANSSENS, I. A., COENEN, K., XIAO, C. W., CEULEMANS, R., 2005: Contrasting net primary productivity and carbon distribution between neighboring stands of Quercus robur and Pinus sylvestris. Tree Physiology, 25, 701-712. 10.1093/treephys/25.6.70115805090Search in Google Scholar