[Bauls, A., Krišjāne, Z. (2002). Latvian regional differences in the migration processes. Folia Geographica, 10, 55-63. (in Latvian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Bauls, A., Krišjāne, Z., Mežciema, G. (2003). Evalution of the urban environment in the different parts of Rīga. Folia Geographica, 11, 79-95 (in Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Berry, B. J. L. (ed.) (1976). Urbanization and Counterurbanization. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. 329 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boren, T., Gentile, M. (2007). Metropolitan processes in post-communist states: An introduction. Geografiska Annaler, 89 B (2), 95-110.10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00242.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia (2006). Demography. Collection of statistical data. Riga. 140 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Champion, A. G. (1989). Introduction: The counterurbanization experience. In Champion, A. G. (ed.). Counterurbanization: The Changing Pace and Nature of Population Deconcentration (pp. 1-18). London: Edward Arnold.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chipeniuk, R. (2004). Planning for amenity migration in Canada. Mountain Research and Development, 24(4), 327-335.10.1659/0276-4741(2004)024[0327:PFAMIC]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, E. D., Cosgrove, C. J. (1991). Amenities versus labor market opportunities: Choosing the optimal distance to move. J. Regional Sci., 31(3), 311-328.10.1111/j.1467-9787.1991.tb00150.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahms, F. A., McComb, J. (1999). ‘Counterurbanization’, interaction and functional change in a rural amenity area—a Canadian example. J. Rural Studies, 15(2), 129-146.10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00056-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Eglīte, P. (1992). Iedzīvotāju kvalitātes izpētes aizsākums [Beginnings of research on population quality]. Latvijas Zinātņu Akadēmijas Vēstis, A daļa, 6, 11-19 (in Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferguson, M., Ali, K., Olfert, M. R., D., Partridge, M. (2007). Voting with their feet: Jobs versus amenities. Growth and Changes, 38(1), 77-110.10.1111/j.1468-2257.2007.00354.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Findlay, A., Rogerson, R. (1993). Migration, places and quality of life: Voting with their feet. In Champion, T. (ed). Population Matters, The Local Dimension (pp. 34-49). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fisher, T. (2003). Differentiation of growth processes in the peri-urban region: An Australian case study. Urban Studies 40(3), 551-565.10.1080/0042098032000053914]Search in Google Scholar
[Ford, T. (1999). Understanding population growth in the peri-urban region. Int. J. Popul. Geogr., 5, 297-311.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1220(199907/08)5:4<297::AID-IJPG152>3.0.CO;2-O]Search in Google Scholar
[Frey, W. H. (1988). Migration and metropolitan decline in developed countries: A comparative study. Popul. Devel. Rev., 14(4), 595-628.10.2307/1973626]Search in Google Scholar
[Glorioso, R. S. (2000). Amenity migration in the Sumava Bioregion, Czech Republic: Implications for ecological integrity. In Godde, P. M., Price, M. F., Zimmerman, F. M. (eds.). Tourism and Development in Mountain Regions (pp. 275-295). Oxford: CABI Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Glorioso, R. S., Moss, L. A. G. (2007). Amenity migration to mountain regions: Current knowledge and a strategic construct for sustainable management. Social Change, 37(3), 137-161.10.1177/004908570703700108]Search in Google Scholar
[Graves, P. E., Linneman, P. D. (1979). Household migration: Theoretical and empirical Results. J. Urban Econ., 6, 383-404.10.1016/0094-1190(79)90038-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenwood, J. M., Hunt, L. G. (1989). Jobs versus amenities in the analysis of metropolitan migration. J. Urban Econ., 25, 1-16.10.1016/0094-1190(89)90040-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Jobes, P. C. (2000). Moving nearer to heaven: The illusions and disillusions of migrants to scenic rural places. London: Praeger. 256 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krisjane, Z. (2000). The Quality of Life, Environmental and Human Health Assessment in Latvia. In Owsinski, J., Johansson, M. (eds.). Global-Local Interplay in the Baltic Sea Region. Papers from the 5th International Nordic-Baltic Conference (pp. 422-432). Warsaw: The Interfaces Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krišjāne, Z., Eglīte, P., Bauls A, Lulle, A., Bērziņš, M., Brants, M., Cunska, Z., Gņedovska, I., Ivbulis, B., Kaņējeva, G., Kristaps, G., Krūzmētra, Ž., Kūle, L., Markausa, I. M., Niklass, M., Pavlina, I., Titova, N., Vanaga, S., Vilciņš, A., Zariņa, I. B. (2007) Darbaspēka geogrāfiskā mobilitāte [The Geographic Mobility of the Labour Force]. Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte. 240 lpp. (in Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Krišjāne, Z., Bauls, A. (2005). Migrācijas regionālās iezīmes Latvijā [Regional features of migration in Latvia]. Demogrāfiskā situācija šodien un rīt. Stratēgiskās analīzes komisija. Zinātniski pētnieciskie raksti 3(4), 130-149 (in Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Krišjāne, Z., Bauls, A. (2007). Migrācijas plūsmu regionālās iezīmes Latvijā [Regional features of migration flows in Latvia]. Paaudžu nomaiņa un migrācija Latvijā. Stratēgiskās analīzes komisija. Zinātniski pētnieciskie raksti, 4(15), 130-143 (in Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Krupka, J. D. (2004). Location-specific Human Capital, Migration and Amenities. Georgia State University: Urban and Regional Analysis Group. 45 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kulu, H., Billari, F. C. (2004) Multilevel analysis of internal migration in a transitional country: The case of Estonia. Regional Studies, 38(6), 679-696.10.1080/003434042000240978]Search in Google Scholar
[Lessinger, J. (1991). Penturbia. WA: Socio-Economic, Seattle. 340 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewis, G. (2000). Changing places in a rural world: The population turnaround in perspective. Geography, 85(2), 157-165.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ott, T. (2001) From concentration to de-concentration—migration patterns in the post-socialist city. Cities, 18(6), 403-412.10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00032-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Ourednicek, M. (2007). Differential suburban development in Prague urban region. Geografiska Annaler, 89 B(2), 111-126.10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00243.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Portnov, B. (2001). Employment—Housing paradigm of internal migration: Evidence from Norway. Int. Migration, 39(2), 93-117.10.1111/1468-2435.00151]Search in Google Scholar
[Richardson, H. (1973) Regional Growth Theory. Macmillian Basingstoke, Lodon. 264 pp.10.1007/978-1-349-01748-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Roback, J. (1982). Wages, rents, and the quality of life. J. Polit. Econ., 90(6), 57-78.10.1086/261120]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. J. Polit. Econ., 82(1), 34-55.10.1086/260169]Search in Google Scholar
[Rudzitis, G. (1996). Wilderness and the Changing West. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 240 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rudzitis, G. (1999). Amenities increasingly draw people to the rural west. Rural Devel. Persp., 14(2), 9-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stockdale, A., Findlay, A., Short, D. (2000) The repopulation of rural Scotland and threat. J. Rural Studies, 16, 243-257.10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00045-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Sykora, L., Novak, J. (2007). A city in motion: Time-space activity and mobility patterns of suburban inhabitants and the structuration of the spatial organization of Prague metropolitan area. Geografiska Annaler, 89 B(2), 147-167.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tammaru, T. (2005). Suburbanisation, employment change, and commuting in the Tallinn metropolitan area. Environ. Plan., 37 A, 1669-1687.10.1068/a37118]Search in Google Scholar
[Ullman, E. L. (1954). Amenities as a factor in regional growth. Geogr. Rev., 44, 119-132.10.2307/211789]Search in Google Scholar
[Vaskis, E. (ed.) (2001). Living conditions in Latvia. Rīga: LR CSP, FAFO. 237 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vining, D. R., Kontuly, T. (1978). Population dispersal from major metropolitan regions: An international comparison. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev., 3(1), 49-73.10.1177/016001767800300102]Search in Google Scholar
[Lundholm, E. (2006). Are movers still the same? Characteristics of interegional migration in Sweden 1970-2001. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(3), 336-348.10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00401.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Markausa, I.-M. (1997). Dzīvesvietas pievilcības vērtējums un iespējamā migrācija Latvijas iedzīvotāju skatījumā [Attractivity of the actual place of residence and intentions to change it]. In Demogrāfiskā situācija Latvijas laukos un iekšējā migrācija 90-to gadu pirmajā pusē. Apcerējumi par Latvijas iedzīvotājiem. Nr. 1. Rīga: LZA Ekonomikas institūts, pp. 64-81 (in Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Moss, L. A. G. (2006). The amenity migrants: Ecological challenge to contemporary Shangri-La. In Moss, L. A. G. (ed.), Amenity Migrants: Seeking and Sustaining Mountains and Their Cultures (pp. 3-26). Wallingford, Oxfordshire: CABI Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Niedomysl, T. (2006). Migration and place attractiveness. Geografiska Regionstudier, 68, 46 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halliday, J., Coombest, M. (1995). In search of counterurbanisation: Some evidence from Devon on the relationship between patterns of migration and motivation. J. Rural Studies, 11(4), 433-446.10.1016/0743-0167(95)00032-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Hazans, M. (2003). Determinants of inter-regional migration in the Baltic countries. In: 43rd Congress of European Regional Science Association, 27-30 August 2003, Jyväskylä, Finland, pp. 1-23.10.2139/ssrn.742184]Search in Google Scholar