Solving the Topographic Potential Bias as an Initial Value Problem

Ågren J. (2004) Regional geoid determination methods for the era of satellite gravimetry, Doctoral dissertation in Geodesy, Royal Institute of Technology, TRITA-INFRA 04-033, Stockholm. www.infra.kth.se/geo/Search in Google Scholar

Bjerhammar A. (1962) Gravity reduction to a spherical surface. Royal Institute of Technology, Division of Geodesy, StockholmSearch in Google Scholar

Bjerhammar A (1974) Discrete approaches to the solution of the boundary value problem of physical geodesy. Paper presented at the International School of Geodesy, Erice, ItalySearch in Google Scholar

Cook A. H. (1967) The determination of the external gravity field of the Earth from observation of artificial satellites. Geophysical Journal of Royal Astronomy Society, Vol. 13.10.1111/j.1365-246X.1967.tb02161.xSearch in Google Scholar

Heiskanen W. A. and H. Moritz (1967). Physical geodesy. W H Freeman and Co., San Francisco and London10.1007/BF02525647Search in Google Scholar

Holota P. (1994) Two branches of the Newton potential and geoid. In H Suenkel and I Marson (eds.): Gravity and Geoid. IAG Symposia No. 113, Graz, Springer, 205-214Search in Google Scholar

Holota P. (1996) Geoid, Cauchy's problem and displacement. In J Segawa, H Fujimoto and S Okubo (eds.): Gravity, Geoid and Marin Geodesy. IAG Symposia No. 117, Tokyo, Springer, 368-375Search in Google Scholar

Kellog O. D.(1953) Foundations of potential theory, Dover Publ., Inc., New YorkSearch in Google Scholar

Krarup T. (1969) A contribution to the mathematical foundation of physical geodesy. Geodaetisk Institut, Meddelelse no. 48, CopenhagenSearch in Google Scholar

Landkof N. S. (1972) Foundations of modern potential theory, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York10.1007/978-3-642-65183-0Search in Google Scholar

Moritz H. (1980) Advanced physical geodesy. Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe.Search in Google Scholar

Rapp R. H. (1997) Use of potential coefficient models for geoid undulation determinations using a spherical harmonic representation of the height anomaly/geoid undulation difference, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 71, 282-289.10.1007/s001900050096Search in Google Scholar

Sjöberg L. E. (1977) On the errors of spherical harmonic developments of gravity at the surface of the earth, Depth Geod Sci Rep No. 257, The OSU, Columbus, OH10.21236/ADA052713Search in Google Scholar

Sjöberg L. E. (2003a) A solution to the downward continuation effect on the geoid determined by Stokes's formula, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 77, 94-10010.1007/s00190-002-0306-1Search in Google Scholar

Sjöberg L. E. (2003b) A computational scheme to model the geoid by the modified Stokes's formula without gravity reductions, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 77, 423-43210.1007/s00190-003-0338-1Search in Google Scholar

Sjöberg L. E. (2007) The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 81, 345-350Search in Google Scholar

Sjöberg L. E.(2008) Answers to the comments by M. Vermeer on L. E. Sjöberg (2007) "The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy" J Geod 81:345-350, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 82, 451-45210.1007/s00190-007-0193-6Search in Google Scholar

Sjöberg L. E. (2009a) The terrain correction in gravimetric geoid computation - is it needed? Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 176, 14-18.10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03851.xSearch in Google Scholar

Sjöberg L. E. (2009b) On the topographic bias in geoid determination by the external gravity field, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 83, 967-972.10.1007/s00190-009-0314-5Search in Google Scholar

Vermeer M. (2008) Comment on Sjöberg (2007) "The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy "J Geod 81(5),345-350, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 82, 445-450.Search in Google Scholar