1. bookVolumen 23 (2022): Edición 3 (June 2022)
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
1407-6179
Primera edición
20 Mar 2000
Calendario de la edición
4 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés
access type Acceso abierto

Factors Affecting the Growth of Demand on Carsharing Services Within Smart City

Publicado en línea: 04 Jul 2022
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 23 (2022) - Edición 3 (June 2022)
Páginas: 252 - 261
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
1407-6179
Primera edición
20 Mar 2000
Calendario de la edición
4 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés
Abstract

The carsharing services have become the necessary component of the life of smart and sustainable city. They meet the numerous requirements put forward by these cities concepts and make life in urban environment cleaner, more comfortable and convenient and better organized. The goal of this research is to determine the factors facilitating the demand for the carsharing services, and on the basis of this analysis to consider the costs structure of these companies. The results are obtained via PLS-SEM analyses implementation in SmartPLS-3.3.7 software. The analysis revealed that such factors as Convenience, Additional Values and Economic (saving factors) have positive impact on growth of demand for carsharing services while New Way of Thinking is insignificant. However, the developed Costs function demonstrate that companies assume the costs of promoting “green” effect of carsharing as important ones. If they reduce these types of costs, it will have positive impact on their efficiency without decrease of demand.

Keywords

1. Barba, J. (2016) Why People Resist New Technologies. Available at: http://www.game-changer.net/2016/07/28/why-people-resist-new-technologies/#.YpSGINhBzIV [Accessed 29.04.2022.] Search in Google Scholar

2. Bednarska-Olejniczak, D., Olejniczak, J., Svobodová, L. (2019) Towards a smart and sustainable city with the involvement of public participation—The case of Wroclaw. Sustainability, 11(2), 332.10.3390/su11020332 Search in Google Scholar

3. Chin, W.W. (1998) The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In: Modern Methods for Business Research; Macoulides, G.A., Ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, USA; pp. 295–336. Search in Google Scholar

4. Chin, W.W., Cheah, J.H., Liu, Y., Ting, H., Lim, X.J., Cham, T.H. (2020) Demystifying the role of causal-predictive modeling using partial least squares structural equation modeling in information systems research. Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 20, 2161–2209. Search in Google Scholar

5. Daskalakis, S., Mantas, J. (2008) Evaluating the impact of a service-oriented framework for healthcare interoperability. In: eHealth Beyond the Horizon; Anderson, S.K., Klein, G.O., Schulz, S., Aarts, J., Mazzoleni, M.C., Eds.; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 285–290. Search in Google Scholar

6. Deloitte Monitor. (2017) Car Sharing in Europe. Business Models, National Variations and Upcoming Disruptions. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/de/Documents/consumer-industrialproducts/CIP-Automotive-Car-Sharing-in-Europe.pdf [Accessed 15.04.2022.] Search in Google Scholar

7. Frenken, K., Schor, J. (2017) Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003 Search in Google Scholar

8. Garson, D. (2016) Partial Least Squares (PLS-SEM): Regression & Structural Equation Models. Statistical Associates Publishing, North Carolina State University: Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Search in Google Scholar

9. Government of Canada. (2021). Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. Car sharing. Available at: https://ic.gc.ca/eic/site/oca-bc.nsf/eng/ca03013.html [Accessed 15.04.2022.] Search in Google Scholar

10. Hair Jr. J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., Kuppelwieser, V.G. (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev., 26, 106–121 https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128. Search in Google Scholar

11. Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C.L., Randolph, A.B., Chong, A.Y.L. (2017b) An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 117, 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-04-2016-0130 Search in Google Scholar

12. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. (2017) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. Search in Google Scholar

13. Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M. (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev., 31, 2–24. Search in Google Scholar

14. Hamari, J. (2015) The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.10.1002/asi.23552 Search in Google Scholar

15. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 43, 115–135. Search in Google Scholar

16. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R. (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In: New Challenges to International Marketing (Advances in International Marketing), 20, 277–319. Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK.10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014 Search in Google Scholar

17. Höck, M., Ringle, C.M. (2006) Strategic Networks in the Software Industry: An Empirical Analysis of the Value Continuum. IFSAM 6th World Congress: Berlin, Germany. Search in Google Scholar

18. Hossain, M. (2020) Sharing economy: A comprehensive literature review. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 87, 102470. Search in Google Scholar

19. Ismagilova, E., Hughes, L., Dwivedi, Y.K., Raman, K.R. (2019) Smart cities: Advances in research – An information systems perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag., 47, 88–100. Search in Google Scholar

20. Kim, K., Jung, J.K., Choi, J.Y. (2016) Impact of the smart city industry on the Korean national economy: Input-output analysis. Sustainability, 8, 649.10.3390/su8070649 Search in Google Scholar

21. Kirimtat, A., Krejcar, O., Kertesz, A., Tasgetiren, M.F. (2020) Future Trends and Current State of Smart City Concepts: A Survey. IEEE Access, 8, 86448–86467.10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2992441 Search in Google Scholar

22. Lim, W.M. (2020) The sharing economy: A marketing perspective. Australasian Marketing Journal AMJ, 28, 4–13.10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.06.007 Search in Google Scholar

23. Louvet, N. (2017) National Survey on Carsharing in France. Available at: https://6-t.co/en/national-survey-carsharing-france-2016/ [Accessed 15.04.22022.] Search in Google Scholar

24. Lytras, M.D., Visvizi, A. (2018) Who uses smart city services and what to make of it: Toward interdisciplinary smart cities research. Sustainability, 10, 1998.10.3390/su10061998 Search in Google Scholar

25. Lytras, M.D., Visvizi, A., Chopdar, P.K., Sarirete, A., Alhalabi, W. (2021) Information Management in Smart Cities: Turning end users’ views into multi-item scale development, validation, and policy-making recommendations. Int. J. Inf. Manag., 56, 102146.10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102146 Search in Google Scholar

26. Mateos-Aparicio, G. (2011) Partial least squares (PLS) methods: Origins, evolution, and application to social sciences. Commun. Stat., 40, 2305–2317.10.1080/03610921003778225 Search in Google Scholar

27. Popova, Y. (2021) Economic Basis of Digital Banking Services Produced by FinTech Company in Smart City. J. Tour. Serv., 23, 86–104. Search in Google Scholar

28. Popova, Y., Popovs, S. (2022) Impact of Smart Economy on Smart Areas and Mediation Effect of National Economy. Sustainability, 14(5), 2789.10.3390/su14052789 Search in Google Scholar

29. Popova, Y., Zagulova, D. (2022b) Aspects of E-Scooter Sharing in the Smart City. Informatics, 9(2), Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.10.3390/informatics9020036 Search in Google Scholar

30. Popova, Y.; Zagulova, D. (2022) UTAUT Model for Smart City Concept Implementation: Use of Web Applications by Residents for Everyday Operations. Informatics, 9, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9010027 Search in Google Scholar

31. Rahi, S. (2017) Structural Equation Modeling Using SmartPLS. Independent Publishing Platform. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328560499_Structural_Equation_Modeling_Using_Smart PLS [Accessed 12 January 2022.] Search in Google Scholar

32. Ringle, C., Da Silva, D., Bido, D. (2015) Structural equation modeling with the Smart PLS. Braz. J. Mark., 13. Search in Google Scholar

33. Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., Gudergan, S.P. (2020) Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. Res., 31, 1617–1643. Search in Google Scholar

34. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Will, A. (2005) SmartPLS 2.0 M3. University of Hamburg: Hamburg, Germany. Search in Google Scholar

35. Rönkkö, M., Evermann, J. (2013) A critical examination of common beliefs about partial least squares path modeling. Organ. Res. Methods, 16, 425–448. Search in Google Scholar

36. Sarstedt, M., Mooi, E.A. (2014) A Concise Guide to Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; Chapter 7. Search in Google Scholar

37. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Hair, J.F. (2017) Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling. Handbook of Market Research. Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., Vomberg, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany.10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1 Search in Google Scholar

38. Schlägel, C., Sarstedt, M. (2016) Assessing the measurement invariance of the four-dimensional cultural intelligence scale across countries: A composite model approach. Eur. Manag. J., 34, 633–649.10.1016/j.emj.2016.06.002 Search in Google Scholar

39. Schor, J. et al. (2014) Paradoxes of Openness and Distinction in the Sharing Economy. Boston: Boston College. Search in Google Scholar

40. Shujahat, M., Ali, B., Nawaz, F., Durst, S., Kianto, A. (2018) Translating the impact of knowledge management into knowledge-based innovation: The neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker satisfaction. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind., 28, 200–212. Search in Google Scholar

41. Tang, H.T., Lee, Y.M. (2016) The Making of Sustainable Urban Development: A Synthesis Framework. Sustainability, 8, 492.10.3390/su8050492 Search in Google Scholar

42. United Nations General Assembly. (1987) Report on World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, p. 43. Search in Google Scholar

43. University of Alicante. (2015) Smart Economy. Available at: https://web.ua.es/en/smart/smart-economy-economiainteligente.html [Accessed 07.04.2022.] Search in Google Scholar

44. Valaei, N., Nikhashemi, S.R., Javan, N. (2017) Organizational factors and process capabilities in a KM strategy: Toward a unified theory. J. Manag. Dev., 36, 560–580. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-04-2016-0057936 Search in Google Scholar

45. Visvizi, A., Mazzucelli, C., Lytras, M.D. (2017) Irregular migratory flows: Towards an ICT-enabled integrated framework for resilient urban systems. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag., 8, 227–242. Search in Google Scholar

46. Wang, Z., Sharma, P.N., Cao, J. (2016) From knowledge sharing to firm performance: A predictive model comparison. J. Bus. Res., 69, 4650–4658. Search in Google Scholar

47. Wong, K.K.K. (2019) Mastering Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with Smartpls in 38 Hours. iUniverse: Bloomington, IN, USA. Search in Google Scholar

48. Zhilenkova, E., Budanova, M., Bulkhov, N., Rodionov, D. (2019) Reproduction of intellectual capital in innovative-digital economy environment. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 497(1), 012065.10.1088/1757-899X/497/1/012065 Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo