1. bookVolumen 15 (2014): Edición 4 (December 2014)
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
1407-6179
Primera edición
20 Mar 2000
Calendario de la edición
4 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés
Acceso abierto

Usage of Production Functions in the Comparative Analysis of Transport Related Fuel Consumption

Publicado en línea: 19 Dec 2014
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 15 (2014) - Edición 4 (December 2014)
Páginas: 292 - 298
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
1407-6179
Primera edición
20 Mar 2000
Calendario de la edición
4 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés

1. Allan G., Hanley N., McGregor P., Swales K., Turner K. (2007): The impact of increased efficiency in the industrial use of energy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for the United Kingdom, Energy Economics, 29, p. 779-798.Search in Google Scholar

2. Arrow, K. J., Chenery, H. B., Minhas, B. S. and Solow, R. M. (1961), Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency, Review of Economics and Statistics 43, p. 225-250.Search in Google Scholar

3. Avinash K., Stiglitz E. (1977): Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity, American Economic Review 67 (3), p. 297-308.Search in Google Scholar

4. Beauséjour, L., Lenjosek, G, Smart, M., (1995): A CGE approach to modelling carbon dioxide emissions control in Canada and the US. The World Economy 18, p. 457-489.10.1111/j.1467-9701.1995.tb00224.xSearch in Google Scholar

5. Bergman, L., (1988): Energy policy modelling: a survey of general equilibrium approaches. Journal of Policy Modelling 10, p. 377-399.10.1016/0161-8938(88)90028-2Search in Google Scholar

6. Cobb, C. W., Douglas, P. H. (1928): A Theory of Production. American Economic, Review Supplement 18: p. 139-165.Search in Google Scholar

7. Conrad, K., (1999): Computable general equilibrium models for environmental economics and policy analysis. In: van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (Ed.), Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham.Search in Google Scholar

8. Conrad, K., Schröder, M., (1993): Choosing environmental policy instruments using general equilibrium models. Journal of Policy Modelling 15, p. 521-543.10.1016/0161-8938(93)90004-ASearch in Google Scholar

9. de Brown, M. and de Carni, J. S. (1963), Technological Change and the Distribution of Income, International Economic Review 3, p. 289-309.Search in Google Scholar

10. Despotakis, K.A., Fisher, A.C., (1988): Energy in a regional economy: a computable general equilibrium model for California. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15, p.313-330.10.1016/0095-0696(88)90005-8Search in Google Scholar

11. Domanovszky, H. (2014). Gas propulsion or e-mobility is the solution on the way of clean and carbon free road transportation? Periodica Polytechnika Transportation Engineering, 42(1), 63-72.10.3311/PPtr.7254Search in Google Scholar

12. Goulder, L.H., (1998): Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: an intertemporal general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, p271-297.10.1006/jeem.1995.1047Search in Google Scholar

13. Kerepesi K, Romvári E. (1993): Economics for Engineers [in Hungarian: Közgazdaságtan mérnököknek], Müegyetemi Kiadó, Budapest, p.471.Search in Google Scholar

14. Lee, H., Roland-Holst, D.W., (1997): Trade and the environment. In: Francois, J.F., Reihert, K.A. (Eds.), Applied Methods for Trade Analysis: A Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139174824.018Search in Google Scholar

15. Li, P., Rose, A., (1995): Global warming policy and the Pennsylvania economy: a computable general equilibrium analysis. Economic Systems Research, 7, p.151-171.10.1080/09535319500000018Search in Google Scholar

16. Maeda A., (2010): Estimating the Impact of GHG Target-Setting on the Macroeconomy, Kyoto Sustainability Initiative, Kyoto UniversitySearch in Google Scholar

17. Mitsakis, E., Papanikolaou, A., Ayfadopoulou, G., Salanova, J., Doll, C, Giannopoulos, G., & Zerefos, C. (2014). An integrated framework for linking climate change impacts to emergency adaptation strategies for transport networks. European Transport Research Review, 6(2), 103-111.10.1007/s12544-013-0114-0Search in Google Scholar

18. Saito T. (2011): The Algebra of Convergence from CES to Cobb-Douglas and Leontief Lecture Notes State University of New York at Buffalo.Search in Google Scholar

19. Saunders, H. D. (2008): Fuel conserving (and using) production functions, Energy Economics 30, p.2184-2235.Search in Google Scholar

20. Siwale, L., Kristóf, L., Adam, T., Bereczky, A., Penninger, A., Mbarawa, M., & Andrei, K. (2013). Performance Characteristics of n-Butanol-Diesel Fuel Blend Fired in a Turbo-Charged Compression Ignition Engine. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 1(05), p.77-83.10.4236/jpee.2013.15013Search in Google Scholar

21. Solow, R. (1956), A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, Quarterly. Journal of Economics 70, p.65-94.Search in Google Scholar

22. Spence, M. (1976): Product selection, fixed costs, and monopolistic competition, Review of Economic Studies 43 (2), p.217-35.Search in Google Scholar

23. Szendrö, G., & Török, Á. (2014). Theoretical investigation of environmental development pathways in the road transport sector in the European Region. Transport, 29(1), p. 12-17.10.3846/16484142.2014.893538Search in Google Scholar

24. Temple J. (2012): The calibration of CES production functions, Journal of Macroeconomics 34 p.294-303.Search in Google Scholar

25. Torok A. (2014): Environmental Comparism Of Road And Railway Transport: A Case Study In Hungary, Inetrnational Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 4(2):210-219 doi: 10.7708/ijtte.2014.4(2).0710.7708/ijtte.2014.4(2).07Search in Google Scholar

26. van der Werf E. (2007): Production Functions for Climate Policy Modelling: An Empirical Analysis, Kiel Working Paper No. 1316, Research Paper, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Duesternbrooker Weg 120, 24105 Kiel (Germany), p.31.Search in Google Scholar

27. Vass, S., Németh, H. (2013). Sensitivity analysis of instantaneous fuel injection rate determination for detailed Diesel combustion models. Periodica Polytechnika Transportation Engineering, 41(1), p.77-85.10.3311/PPtr.7106Search in Google Scholar

28. Wei T. (2006): Impact of energy efficiency gains on output and energy use with Cobb-Douglas production function, Energy Policy, 35, p.2023-2030.Search in Google Scholar

29. Xu Y, Masui T (2008): Local air pollutant emission reduction and ancillary carbon benefits of SO2 control policies: Application of AIM/CGE model to China, European Journal of Operational Research 198, p. 315-325.Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo