Acceso abierto

Tokenistic behavior? Exploring Blockchain and DAOs as a participatory practice in museums


Cite

Adair, B., Filene, B., Koloski, L., 2011. Letting Go? Sharing Historical Authority in a User-Generated World. Left Coast Press Inc., Walnut Creek, CA.Search in Google Scholar

Baran, P., 1964. On Distributed Communications Networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. Syst. 12, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1964.1088883Search in Google Scholar

Beaude, B., 2016. The Ends of the Internet. Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, T., 1995. The Birth of the Museum: His tory, Theory, Politics. Routledge, London.Search in Google Scholar

Bishop, C., 2012. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. Verso, London & New York. Search in Google Scholar

Bishop, C., 2004. Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics. October 110, 51–79.Search in Google Scholar

Black, G., 2012. The Engaging Museum: Developing Museums for Visitor Involvement. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559277Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P., 1986. The Forms of Capital, in: Richardson, J. (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Bourriaud, N., 2002. Relational Aesthetics, 2nd edn. ed. Presses du Réel, Dijon.Search in Google Scholar

Brekke, J.K., Beecroft, K., Pick, F., 2021. The Dissensus Protocol: Governing Differences in Online Peer Communities. Front. Hum. Dyn. 3.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, A., Novak-Leonard, J.L., 2011. Getting In on the Act: How arts groups are creating opportunities for active participation. Wolf Brown.Search in Google Scholar

Byrne, J., Morgan, E., Paynter, N., Sánchez de Serdio, A., Železnik, A., Aksamija, A., 2018. The Constituent Museum: constellations of knowledge, politics and mediation: a generator of social change. Valiz, Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, D.F., 1972. The Museum: A Temple or the Forum. Cah. Hist. Mond. J. World Hist. Cuad. Hist. Mund. Neuchâtel Etc 14, 189–202.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, F., 2008. The Politics of Heritage Authorship: The Case of Digital Heritage Collections, in: New Heritage: New Media and Cultural Heritage. Routledge, London & New York, pp. 170–184.Search in Google Scholar

Carpentier, N., 2015. Differentiating between access, interaction, and participation. Conjunctions 2, 7–28. https://doi.org/10.7146/tjcp.v2i2.23117Search in Google Scholar

Chohan, U.W., 2017. The Decentralized Autonomous Organization and Governance Issues. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3082055Search in Google Scholar

Dewdney, A., Dibosa, D., Walsh, V., 2012. Post Critical Museology: Theory and Practice in the Art Museum. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UNITED KINGDOM.Search in Google Scholar

DuPont, Q., 2019. Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains. Polity Press, Cambridge & Malden.Search in Google Scholar

Filippi, P.D., Wray, C., Sileno, G., 2021. Smart contracts. Internet Policy Rev. 10.Search in Google Scholar

Frisch, M., 2011. Sharing Authority Through Oral History, in: Adair, B., Filene, B., Koloski, L. (Eds.), Letting Go? Sharing Historical Authority in a User-Generated World. The Pew Center for Arts & Heritage, Philadelphia, pp. 126–137.Search in Google Scholar

Gere, C., 1997. Museums, Contact Zones, and the Internet, in: Trant, J., Bearman, D. (Eds.), Museums and the Web: Museums and the Web Selected Papers. Archives & Museum Informatics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp. 59–66.Search in Google Scholar

Gold, K., Leipold, K., Neuschaffer, J., Schwanz, A., 2022. ART+TECH Report. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Golumbia, D., 2016. The Politics of Bitcoin. University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, S., 1999. Un-settling ‘the heritage,’ re-imagining the post-nation: Whose heritage? Third Text 13, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528829908576818Search in Google Scholar

Hooper-Greenhill, E., 1992. Museums and the shaping of knowledge, The heritage: care-preservation-management. Routledge, London.Search in Google Scholar

Idelberger, F., Mezei, P., 2022. Nonfungible tokens. Internet Policy Rev. 11.Search in Google Scholar

Janes, R.R., 2010. The Mindful Museum. Curator Mus. J. 53, 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151–6952.2010.00032.xSearch in Google Scholar

Janes, R.R., Sandell, R., 2019. Museum activism. Routledge, London.Search in Google Scholar

Jung, Y., 2022. Current use cases, benefits, and challenges of NFTs in the museum sector: toward common pool model of NFT sharing for educational purposes. Mus. Manag. Curatorship 0, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2022.2132995Search in Google Scholar

Jung, Y., 2015. Diversity Matters: Theoretical Understanding of and Suggestions for the Current Fundraising Practices of Nonprofit Art Museums. J. Arts Manag. Law Soc. 45, 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2015.1103672Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, K.S., 1998. Effective Fund-Raising Management. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Lang, C., Reeve, J., Woollard, V., 2006. The Responsive Museum: Working with Audiences in the Twenty-first Century. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

LAS Foundation, 2022. Life After BOB | LAS ART FOUNDATION [WWW Document]. URL https://www.las-art.foundation/programme/life-after-bob-the-chalice-study (accessed 7.21.23).Search in Google Scholar

Liddell, F., 2023. The NFT memento: digital thingness and NFTs in exhibition design. Digit. Creat. 0, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2023.2277234Search in Google Scholar

Liddell, F., 2022. The Crypto-Museum: Investigating the impact of blockchain and NFTs on digital ownership, authority, and authenticity in museums. University of Manchester.Search in Google Scholar

Liddell, F., 2021. Building Shared Guardianship through Blockchain Technology and Digital Museum Objects. Mus. Soc. 19, 220–236. https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v19i2.3495Search in Google Scholar

Lotti, L., Bowden, C., 2021. Berlin: Black Swan DAO.Search in Google Scholar

Lynch, B., 2016. Museums Ties Up in Knots, in: McSweeny, K., Kavangh, J. (Eds.), Museum Participation: New Directions for Audience Collaborations.Search in Google Scholar

Lynch, B., 2011. Whose cake is it anyway? A collaborative investigation into engagement and participation in 12 museums and galleries in the UK. Paul Hamlyn Foundation, London.Search in Google Scholar

MacLeod, S., 2020. Museums and Design for Creative Lives. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429398698Search in Google Scholar

Moneylab #11 Session 2 BLACK SWAN DAO, 2021.Search in Google Scholar

Morse, N., 2020. The Museum as a Space of Social Care. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315461403 Search in Google Scholar

Morse, N., 2014. Museums and Community Engagement: The Politics of Practice within Museum Organisations (Doctoral). Durham University.Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, O., 2019. By not for: Engagement strategies in a digital age, in: The Routledge Companion to Arts Management. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, O., 2016. Rethinking Participatory Practice in a Web 2.0 World, in: McSweeny, K., Kavangh, J. (Eds.), Museum Participation: New Directions for Audience Collaboration. MuseumsEtc, Edinburgh & Boston, pp. 104–129. Search in Google Scholar

Nadini, M., Alessandretti, L., Di Giacinto, F., Martino, M., Aiello, L.M., Baronchelli, A., 2021. Mapping the NFT revolution: market trends, trade networks and visual features. ArXiv210600647 Phys. Q-Fin.Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, D., Tan, E., 2021. ConstitutionDAO Outbid for First Printing of America’s Founding Document in Sotheby’s Auction [WWW Document]. URL https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2021/11/19/constitutiondao-outbid-for-first-printing-of-americas-founding-document-in-sothebys-auction/ (accessed 11.19.21).Search in Google Scholar

Nolin, H., Whitaker, A., 2023. Non-Fungible Tokens and Non-Profit Management: Participation, Revenue Generation, and Strategic Planning. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4308458Search in Google Scholar

O’Dwyer, R., 2018. A Celestial Cyberdimension: Art Tokens and the Artwork as Derivative • Circa Art Magazine. Art Mag.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, L.B., 2013. The Temple and the Bazaar: Wikipedia as a Platform for Open Authority in Museums. Curator Mus. J. 56, 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12021Search in Google Scholar

Pine, B.J., Gilmore, J.H., 1999. The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre & Every Business a Stage. Harvard Business Press.Search in Google Scholar

R&D Labyrinths: Black Swan on Cygnet, consensus-building tool, 2021.Search in Google Scholar

Reijers, W., Wuisman, I., Mannan, M., De Filippi, P., Wray, C., Rae-Looi, V., Cubillos Vélez, A., Orgad, L., 2021. Now the Code Runs Itself: On-Chain and Off-Chain Governance of Blockchain Technologies. Topoi 40, 821–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245–018–9626–5Search in Google Scholar

Rozas, D., Tenorio-Fornés, A., Díaz-Molina, S., Hassan, S., 2021. When Ostrom Meets Blockchain: Exploring the Potentials of Blockchain for Commons Governance. SAGE Open 11, 21582440211002526. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211002526Search in Google Scholar

Sandell, R., 1998. Museums as Agents of Social Inclusion. Mus. Manag. Curatorship 17, 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647779800401704Search in Google Scholar

Sargeant, A., Jay, E., 2014. Fundraising Management: Analysis, Planning and Practice. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UNITED KINGDOM.Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, N., 2021. Cryptoeconomics as a limitation on governance. Regul. Gov.Search in Google Scholar

Simon, N., 2010. The Participatory Museum. Museumz, Santa Cruz, California.Search in Google Scholar

Simon, N., 2007. Discourse in the Blogosphere: What Museums Can Learn from Web 2.0. Mus. Soc. Issues 2, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1179/msi.2007.2.2.257Search in Google Scholar

Stublić, H., Bilogrivić, M., Zlodi, G., 2023. Blockchain and NFTs in the Cultural Heritage Domain: A Review of Current Research Topics. Heritage 6, 3801–3819. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6040202Search in Google Scholar

Swan, M., 2015. Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly, Sepastopol.Search in Google Scholar

Tapscott, D., Tapscott, A., 2018. Blockchain Revolution. Penguin, London.Search in Google Scholar

Transparency, 2016., Our Museum. Paul Hamlyn Foundation, London.Search in Google Scholar

Trant, J., 1999. When all You’ve Got is “The Real Thing”: Museums and Authenticity in the Networked World. Arch. Mus. Inform. 12, 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009041909517Search in Google Scholar

Trouillot, T., Catlow, R., Myers, R., Rafferty, P., Singh, B., 2022. What Can DAOs Do for You? Frieze.Search in Google Scholar

Valeonti, F., Bikakis, A., Terras, M., Speed, C., Hudson-Smith, A., Chalkias, K., 2021. Crypto Collectibles, Museum Funding and OpenGLAM: Challenges, Opportunities, and the Potential of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Appl. Sci. 11, 9931. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11219931Search in Google Scholar

Vasan, K., Janosov, M., Barabási, A.-L., 2022. Quantifying NFT-driven networks in crypto art. Sci. Rep. 12, 2769. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05146–6Search in Google Scholar

Vergo, P., 1989. The New Museology. Reaktion Books, London.Search in Google Scholar

WAC, 2023. The Opéra de Paris’s Emergence into Web3. Medium. URL https://medium.com/@wac-lab/theop%C3%A9ra-de-pariss-emergence-into-web3-48e7b12511f6 (accessed 8.2.23).Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, P., 1997. The Web and the Unassailable Voice. Arch. Mus. Inform. 11, 77–87.Search in Google Scholar

Zwart, I., 2023. Beyond the Participatory Project: Practices of Organising, Planning and Doing Participation in Museums.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2246-3755
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
2 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Arts, general, Cultural Studies, Media Studies, Media Theory, General Cultural Studies, Social Sciences, other