[Auld, M. C., Sidhu, N. (2005) Schooling, cognitive ability and health, Health Economics, 14(10), 1019–103410.1002/hec.1050]Search in Google Scholar
[Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., Metz, E. (2015) Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)?, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 265–28410.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Benbow, C. P., Stanley, J. C. (1980) Sex Differences in Mathematical Ability: Fact or Artifact? Science, 210(12 December), 1978–198010.1126/science.7434028]Search in Google Scholar
[Brañas-Garza, P., Kujal, P., & Lenkei, B. (2015). Cognitive Reflection Test: Whom, how, when. Working Paper.]Search in Google Scholar
[Campitelli, G., Gerrans, P. (2014) Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach, Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 434–4710.3758/s13421-013-0367-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Campitelli, G., Labollita, M. (2010) Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgments and choices, Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 5, No. 3, June 2010, pp. 182–19110.1017/S1930297500001066]Search in Google Scholar
[Cokely, E. T., Kelley, C. M. (2009) Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation, Judgment and Decision Making 4(1), 20–33.10.1017/S193029750000067X]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans, J., Curtis-Holmes, J. (2005) Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning, Thinking & Reasoning, 11(4), 382–38910.1080/13546780542000005]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans, J., Frankisch, K. (2009) In two minds: Dual processes and beyond, Oxford University Press, Oxford10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Eysenck, H. J. (1979) The structure and measurement of intelligence, Springer-Verlag, New York10.1007/978-3-642-67075-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Frederick, S. (2005) Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–4210.1257/089533005775196732]Search in Google Scholar
[Gervais, W. M., Norenzayan, A. (2012) Reminders of secular authority reduce believers’ distrust of atheists, Psychological Science, 23(5), 483–9110.1177/0956797611429711]Search in Google Scholar
[Halpern, D. (2004) A cognitive-process taxonomy for sex differences in cognitive abilities, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 135–13910.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00292.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hedges, L., Nowell, A. (1995) Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals, Science, 269(5220), 41–4510.1126/science.7604277]Search in Google Scholar
[Herrnstein, R. J., Murray, C. (1994) The bell curve: intelligence and class structure an American life, Free Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Lamon, S. J. (1990) Gender Differences in Mathematics Performance : A Meta-Analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139–15510.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen, A. (1980) Bias in Mental Testing, Free Press.10.1017/S0140525X00005161]Search in Google Scholar
[Juanchich, M., Dewberry, C., Sirota, M., & Narendran, S. (2016). Cognitive Reflection Predicts Real-Life Decision Outcomes, but Not Over and Above Personality and Decision-Making Styles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29, (52-59).10.1002/bdm.1875]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman, D., Frederick, S. (2002) Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgmen, Heuristics of Intuitive Judgment: Extensions and Applications10.1017/CBO9780511808098.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(3), 263–29110.2307/1914185]Search in Google Scholar
[Liberali, J. M., Reyna, V. F., Furlan, S., Stein, L. M., Pardo, S. T. (2011) Individual Differences in Numeracy and Cognitive Reflection, with Implications for Biases and Fallacies in Probability Judgment, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(4):361-38110.1002/bdm.752]Search in Google Scholar
[Lubinski, D., Humphreys, L. G. (1997) Incorporating general intelligence into epidemiology and the social sciences, Intelligence, 24(1), 159–20110.1016/S0160-2896(97)90016-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Marincas, D., David, O. A. (2013) Psycho-social Predictors of Baccalaureate Performance of Romanian Students: what Makes the Difference between Students who Fail and those who Succeed?, 14(2), 209]Search in Google Scholar
[Moro, R. (2009) On the nature of the conjunction fallacy, Synthese, 171(1), 1–2410.1007/s11229-008-9377-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Oechssler, J., Roider, A., Schmitz, P. W. (2009) Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 147–15210.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.018]Search in Google Scholar
[Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., Greene, J. D. (2012) Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment, Cognitive Science, 36(1), 163–17710.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Koehler, D. J., Fugelsang, J. (2015) Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?, Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 341–34810.3758/s13428-015-0576-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., Fugelsang, J. A. (2012) Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief, Cognition, 123(3), 335–34610.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Popa, C. A., Bochiş, L. (2016) The influence of baccalaureate average score on academic achievement of undergraduates, Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Psychologia-Paedagogia, 61 (1), 95-106]Search in Google Scholar
[Primi, C., Morsanyi, K., Chiesi, F., Donati, M. A., Hamilton, J. (2016) The Development and Testing of a New Version of the Cognitive Reflection Test Applying Item Response Theory (IRT), Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5), 453–46910.1002/bdm.1883]Search in Google Scholar
[Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D. (2011) Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 141(3), 423–810.1037/a0025391]Search in Google Scholar
[Sherman, J., Gawronski, B., Trope, Y. (2014) In two minds, Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind, ebook: The Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simonton, D. K. (1996) Genius: The natural history of creativity, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(4), 39510.1016/S0005-7967(96)90003-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Sloman, S. A. (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning, Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3–2210.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3]Search in Google Scholar
[Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F. (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645-665-72610.1017/S0140525X00003435]Search in Google Scholar
[Toplak, M. E., Stanovich, K. E. (2002) The domain specificity and generality of disjunctive reasoning: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill, Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 197–20910.1037/0022-0663.94.1.197]Search in Google Scholar
[Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E. (2011) The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks, Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1275–128910.3758/s13421-011-0104-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 147–16810.1080/13546783.2013.844729]Search in Google Scholar
[Travers, E., Rolison, J. J., Feeney, A. (2016) The time course of conflict on the Cognitive Reflection Test, Cognition, 150, 109–11810.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1983), Extension versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment, Psychological Review. 90 (4): 293–31510.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, D. C., Highhouse, S., & Rada, T. B. (2016). Explaining sex differences on the Cognitive Reflection Test. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 425–427.10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.034]Search in Google Scholar