[
Baltin, Mark. 2012. Deletion versus pro-forms: an overly simple dichotomy? Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30. 381–423. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-011-9157-x10.1007/s11049-011-9157-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2005. Long Distance Agreement in Hindi-Urdu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23. a757. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-004-4136-010.1007/s11049-004-4136-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Błaszczak, Joanna. 2001. Covert movement and the Genitive of Negation in Polish. Universitätsbibliothek Potsdam.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Błaszczak, Joanna. 2008. Differential subject marking in Polish: The case of genitive vs. nominative subjects in “X was not at Y”-constructions. In Helen de Hoop & Peter de Swart (eds.), Differential subject marking, Springer. 113–149.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Błaszczak, Joanna. 2010. A spurious genitive puzzle in Polish. In Thomas Hanneforth & Gisbert Fanselow (eds.), Language and logos. Studies in theoretical and computational linguistics, Akademie Verlag. 17–47. DOI: 10.1524/9783050062365.1710.1524/9783050062365.17
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bondaruk, Anna. 2004. PRO and control in English, Irish and Polish – a minimalist analysis. Wydawnictwo Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borschev, Vladimir & Barbara H. Partee. 2002. The Russian genitive of negation in existential sentences: The role of Theme-Rheme structure reconsidered. In Eva Hajičová, Petr Sgall, Jirí Hana & Tomáš Hoskovec (eds.), Prague Linguistic Circle Papers 4, John Benjamins. 185–250. DOI: 10.1075/plcp.4.11bor10.1075/plcp.4.11bor
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bošković, Željko. 2007. On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry 38(4). 589–644. DOI: 10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.58910.1162/ling.2007.38.4.589
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bošković, Željko. 2011. Rescue by PF-deletion, traces as (non)interveners, and the that-trace effect. Linguistic Inquiry 42(1). 1–44. DOI: 10.1162/LING_a_0002710.1162/LING_a_00027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, Sue. 1999. The syntax of negation in Russian: A Minimalist approach. CSLI Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, Sue & Adam Przepiórkowski (eds.). 2006. Negation in Slavic. Slavica.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries. In Richard Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, The MIT Press. 89–156.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, The MIT Press. 1–52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On Phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlo Otero & Maria Luiza Zubizarreta (eds.), Issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, The MIT Press. 133–166.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.00310.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Citko, Barbara. 2014. Phase theory. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978113964403710.1017/CBO9781139644037
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dikken, Marcel den. 2007. Phase Extension: Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction. Theoretical Linguistics 33(1). 1–41. DOI: 10.1515/TL.2007.00110.1515/TL.2007.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Edwin Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fisiak, Jacek. 1978. An introductory English-Polish contrastive grammar. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fox, Danny. 1999. Reconstruction, Binding Theory and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30(2). 157–196. DOI: 10.1162/00243899955402010.1162/002438999554020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frampton, John & Sam Gutmann. 2000. Agreement is feature sharing. Unpublished MS., Northeastern University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Franks, Steven. 1994. Parametric properties of numeral phrases in Slavic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 12. 597–674. DOI: 10.1007/BF0099292910.1007/BF00992929
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Franks, Steven. 2017. Syntax and Spell-Out in Slavic. Slavica.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallego, Ángel J. 2010. Phase theory. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/la.15210.1075/la.152
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heycock, Caroline. 1995. Asymmetries in reconstruction. Linguistic Inquiry 26(4). 547–570.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hornstein, Norbert. 2001. Move! A minimalist theory of construal. Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hornstein, Norbert, 2003. On control. In Randall Hendrick (ed.), Minimalist syntax, Blackwell. 6–81. DOI: 10.1002/9780470758342.ch110.1002/9780470758342.ch1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kagan, Olga. 2012. Semantics of genitive objects in Russian: A study of Genitive of Negation and intensional genitive case. Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5225-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Kluwer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Landau, Idan. 2008. Two routes of control: Evidence from case transmission in Russian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26. 877–924. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-008-9054-010.1007/s11049-008-9054-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lebeaux, David. 2009. Where does binding theory apply? The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262012904.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Legate, Julie A. 2003. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3). 506–515. DOI: 10.1162/ling.2003.34.3.50610.1162/ling.2003.34.3.506
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marušić, Franc L. 2005. On non-simultaneous phases. Ph.D. dissertation, Stony Brook University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marušić, Franc L. 2009. Non-simultaneous spell-out in the clausal and nominal domain. In Kleanthes K. Grohmann (ed.), InterPhases: Phase-theoretic investigations of linguistic interfaces, Oxford University Press. 151–181.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Müller, Gereon. 2017. Structure removal: An argument for feature-driven Merge. Glossa: A journal for generative linguistics 2(1). a28. DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.19310.5334/gjgl.193
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Müller, Gereon. 2018. Structure removal in complex prefields. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36. 219–264. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-017-9374-z10.1007/s11049-017-9374-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and categories. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax. The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pesetsky, David. 2013. Russian case morphology and the syntactic categories. The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262019729.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2004. Tense, case, and the nature of syntactic categories. In Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds.), The Syntax of Time, The MIT Press. 495–537. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/6598.003.002110.7551/mitpress/6598.003.0021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, John Benjamins. 262–294. DOI: 10.1075/la.101.14pes10.1075/la.101.14pes
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polinsky, Maria & Eric Potsdam. 2001. Long-distance agreement and Topic in Tsez. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19. 583–646. DOI: 10.1023/A:101075780650410.1023/A:1010757806504
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Przepiórkowski, Adam 1999. Case assignment and the complement-adjunct dichotomy: A nonconfigurational constraint-based approach. Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Tübingen.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Przepiórkowski, Adam. 2000. Long distance Genitive of Negation in Polish. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8. 151–189.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roberts, Ian. A. 1993. Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of English and French. Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-2910-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruda, Marta. 2018. Local operations deriving long-distance relations: Object agreement in Hungarian and the Genitive of Negation in Polish. In Huba Bartos, Marcel den Dikken, Zoltán Bánréti & Tamás Váradi (eds.), Boundaries crossed, at the interfaces of morphosyntax, phonology, pragmatics and semantics, Springer. 133–146. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90710-9_910.1007/978-3-319-90710-9_9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Safir, Ken. 1999. Vehicle change and reconstruction in Ā-chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 587–620. DOI: 10.1162/00243899955422810.1162/002438999554228
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stepanov, Arthur. 2012. Voiding island effects via head movement. Linguistic Inquiry 43(4). 680–693. DOI: 10.1162/ling_a_0011110.1162/ling_a_00111
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Svenonius, Peter. 2004. On the edge. In David Adger, Cécile de Cat & George Tsoulas (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects, Kluwer. 259–287. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-1910-6_1110.1007/1-4020-1910-6_11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tajsner, Przemysław. 1990. Case marking in English and Polish: A Government and Binding study. Ph.D. dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willim, Ewa. 1989. On word order. A Government-Binding study of English and Polish. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Witkoś, Jacek. 1998. The syntax of clitics: Steps towards a Minimalist account. Motivex.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Witkoś, Jacek. 2003. Movement and reconstruction: Questions and Principle C effects in English and Polish. Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Witkoś, Jacek. 2008. Genitive of Negation in Polish and single-cycle derivations. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 16(2). 247–287.10.1353/jsl.0.0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Witkoś, Jacek. 2010. On lack of case on the subject of infinitives in Polish. Folia Linguistica 44(1). 179–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2010.00710.1515/flin.2010.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Witkoś, Jacek. 2013. Smuggling the subject across the object in control. Folia Linguistica 47(2). 521–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2013.01910.1515/flin.2013.019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wurmbrand, Susanne. 2001. Infinitives: Rrestructuring and clause structure. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/978311090832910.1515/9783110908329
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zubkov, Petr. 2018. The grammar of binding. A study with reference to Russian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht.
]Search in Google Scholar
