[
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bax, Marcel & Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. The historical understanding of historical (im)politeness: Introductory notes. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12(1–2). 1–24. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.01bax10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.01bax
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bax, Marcel & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds). 2012. Understanding historical (im)politeness. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/bct.4110.1075/bct.41
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernstein, Basil. 1972. Social class, language and socialization. In Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.), Language and social context. Penguin. 157–178.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blanco Salgueiro, Antonio. 2010. Promises, threats, and the foundations of speech act theory. Pragmatics 20(2). 213–228.10.1075/prag.20.2.05bla
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bock, Martin. 1938. Der stilistische Gebrauch des englischen Personalpronomens der 2. Person im volkstümlichen Dialog der älteren englischen Komödie. PhD dissertation, University of Innsbruck.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bradbrook, Muriel. 1958. Sir Thomas Malory. Longmans, Green & Co..
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braun, Friederike. 1988. Terms of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/978311084811310.1515/9783110848113
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1972 [1960]. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.). Language and social context. Penguin. 252–282.10.1515/9783110805376.252
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18(2). 159–212. DOI: 10.1017/S004740450001346410.1017/S0047404500013464
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bukowska, Joanna. 2002. Theatricality of the chivalric world in Thomas Malory’s Le Morte D’Arthur. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies 3. 33–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Busse, Ulrich. 2002. Linguistic variation in the Shakespeare Corpus: Morpho-syntactic variability of second person pronouns. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.10610.1075/pbns.106
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burnley, David. 2003. The T/V pronouns in later Middle English literature. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. John Benjamins. 27–45. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.10710.1075/pbns.107
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Byrne, St. Geraldine. 1936. Shakespeare’s use of the pronoun of address. The Catholic University of America.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2009. Historical sociopragmatics: An introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10(2). 179–186. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.10.2.02cul10.1075/jhp.10.2.02cul
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2010. Conventionalized impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 42(12). 3232–3245. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.00710.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2012. (Im)politeness: Three issues. Journal of Pragmatics 44(9). 1128–1133.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, Jonathan & Daniel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2010. Historical (im)politeness. Peter Lang. DOI: 10.3726/978-3-0351-0025-910.3726/978-3-0351-0025-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, Jonathan & Minna Nevala. 2012. Sociocultural processes and the history of English. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford University Press. 365–391. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.003210.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Del Lungo Camiciotti, Gabriella. 2008. Two polite speech acts from a diachronic perspective: Aspects of the realisation of requesting and undertaking commitments in the nineteenth-century commercial community. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds). 2008. Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins. 115–131. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176.07del10.1075/pbns.176.07del
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Field, Peter (ed.). 2013. Sir Thomas Malory: Le Morte Darthur. 2 vols. D. S. Brewer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fukada, Atsushi & Noriko Asato. 2004. Universal politeness theory: Application to the use of Japanese honorifics. Journal of Pragmatics 36(11). 1991–2002. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.11.00610.1016/j.pragma.2003.11.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goffman Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Anchor Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goffman Erving. 1972 [1964]. The neglected situation. In Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.), Language and social context. Penguin. 61–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goffman Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. Harper and Row.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Honegger, Thomas. 2003. “And if ye wol nat so, my lady sweete, thanne preye I thee, [...]”. Forms of address in Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. John Benjamins. 61–84. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.107.05hon10.1075/pbns.107.05hon
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jacobs, Andreas & Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. The historical perspective in pragmatics. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics. Pragmatic developments in the history of English. John Benjamins. 3–33. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.35.04jac10.1075/pbns.35.04jac
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jucker, Andreas H. 2006. ʽThou art so loothly and so oold also’: The use of ye and thou in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. Anglistik 17(2). 57–72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jucker, Andreas H. 2008. Historical pragmatics. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5). 894–906. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008.00087.x10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00087.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jucker, Andreas H. 2009. Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments. Journal of Pragmatics 41(8). 1611–1535. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.00410.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jucker, Andreas H. 2010. ʽIn curteisie was set ful muchel hir lest’: Politeness in Middle English. In Jonathan Culpeper & Daniel Z. Kádár (eds.), Historical (im)politeness. Peter Lang. 175-200.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jucker, Andreas H. 2012. Changes in politeness cultures. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford University Press. 422–433. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.003610.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jucker, Andreas H. 2014. Courtesy and politeness in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 49(3). 5–28. DOI: 10.1515/stap-2015-000710.1515/stap-2015-0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(1). 67–95. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2008. Speech acts now and then: Towards a pragmatic history of English. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins. 1–23. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176.02taa10.1075/pbns.176.02taa
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kádár, Daniel Z. & Marcel Bax. 2013. In-group ritual and relational work. Journal of Pragmatics 58. 73–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.01110.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaeuper, Richard & Montgomery Bohna. 2009. War and chivalry. In Peter Brown (ed.), A companion to medieval English literature and culture, c. 1350–c. 1500. Wiley-Blackwell. 273–291.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kohnen, Thomas. 2000. Explicit performatives in Old English: A corpus-based study of directives. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(2). 301–321. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.1.2.07koh10.1075/jhp.1.2.07koh
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kohnen, Thomas. 2002. Towards a history of English directives. In Andreas Fischer, Gunnel Tottie & Peter Schneider (eds), Text types and corpora. Studies in honour of Udo Fries. Gunter Narr. 165–175.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kohnen, Thomas. 2004. “Let mee bee so bold to request you”: Constructions with let me and the history of English directives. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5(1). 159–173. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.5.1.08koh10.1075/jhp.5.1.08koh
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kohnen, Thomas. 2008. Directives in Old English: Beyond politeness?. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins Publishing Co. 27–44. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176.04koh10.1075/pbns.176.04koh
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mahowald, Kyle. 2012. A Naïve Bayes classifier for Shakespeare’s second-person pronoun. Literary and Linguistic Computing 27(1). 17–23. DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqr04510.1093/llc/fqr045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mazzon, Gabriella. 1995. Pronouns and terms of address in Shakespeare’s English: A socio-affective marking system in transition. VIEWS - Vienna English Working Papers 4. 20–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mazzon, Gabriella. 2009. Interactive dialogue sequence in Middle English drama. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.18510.1075/pbns.185
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mazzon, Gabriella. 2010. Terms of address. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical pragmatics. De Gruyter Mouton. 351–378. DOI: 10.1515/9783110214284.5.35110.1515/9783110214284.5.351
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mustanoja, Tauno. 2016 [1960]. A Middle English syntax: Parts of speech. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/z.20710.1075/z.207
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nevala, Minna. 2004. Accessing politeness axes: Forms of address and terms of reference in early English correspondence. Journal of Pragmatics 36(12). 2125–2160. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.02.00110.1016/j.pragma.2004.02.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nakayasu, Minako. 2013. Spatio-temporal system in A treatise on the Astrolabe. Paper presented at ICOME 8, Murcia, Spain.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nurmi, Arja & Päivi Pahta. 2010. Preacher, scholar, brother, friend: Social roles and code-switching in the writings of Thomas Twining. In Päivi Pahta, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin (eds), Social roles and language practices in Late Modern English. John Benjamins. 135–162. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.195.07nur10.1075/pbns.195.07nur
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Riddy, Felicity. 1987. Sir Thomas Malory. Brill.10.1163/9789004624351
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schnurr, Stephanie & Angela Chan. 2009. Politeness and leadership discourse in New Zealand and Hong Kong: A cross-cultural case study of workplace talk. Journal of Politeness Research 5(2). 131–157. DOI: 10.1515/JPLR.2009.00910.1515/JPLR.2009.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Searle, John R. 1976. A classification of illocutionary speech acts. Language and Society 5(1). 1–23. DOI: 10.1017/S004740450000683710.1017/S0047404500006837
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000. Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking. Managing rapport through talk across cultures. Continuum. 11–46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker 2008. Speech acts now and then. Towards a pragmatic history of English. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins. 1–23. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176.02taa10.1075/pbns.176.02taa
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker (eds). 2003. Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.10710.1075/pbns.107
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker (eds). 2008. Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.17610.1075/pbns.176
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vinaver, Eugene (ed.). 1948 [1947]. The works of Sir Thomas Malory. Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walker, Terry. 2003. You and thou in Early Modern English dialogues: Patterns of usage. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. John Benjamins. 309–342. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.107.13wal10.1075/pbns.107.13wal
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walker, Terry. 2007. Thou and you in Early Modern English dialogues. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.15810.1075/pbns.158
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Watts, Richard J. 1989. Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behavior. Multilingua 8(2–3). 131–166. DOI: 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.13110.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.131
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Watts, Richard J. 1992. Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice. Mouton de Gruyter. 43–70. DOI: 10.1515/9783110886542-00510.1515/9783110886542-005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051161518410.1017/CBO9780511615184
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Watts, Richard J. 2005. Linguistic politeness research: Quo vadis? In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice (2nd edn). Mouton de Gruyter. xi–xlvii.10.1515/9783110199819
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Włodarczyk, Matylda. 2016. Genre and literacies: Historical (socio)pragmatics of the 1820 settler petition. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
