[Austin, M. 2007. Species distribution models and ecological theory, a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecological Modelling 200,1–19.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakkestuen, V., Erikstad, L., Halvorsen, R. 2008. Step-less models for regional environmental variation in Norway. Journal of Biogeography 35,1906–1922.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01941.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Chapman, A. D. 2009. Numbers of living species in Australia and the world. Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra, Australia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chefaoui, R. M., J. Hortal, and J. M. Lobo. 2005. Potential distribution modelling, niche characterization and conservation status assessment using GIS tools, a case study of Iberian Copris species. Biological conservation 122,327–338.10.1016/j.biocon.2004.08.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Crawley, M. J. 2013. The R book. Second edition. Wiley, Chichester, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cumming, G. S. 2000. Using between-model comparisons to fine-tune linear models of species ranges. Journal of Biogeography 27,441–455.10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00408.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dupin, M., P. Reynaud, V. Jarošík, R. Baker, S. Brunel, D. Eyre, J. Pergl, and D. Makowski. 2011. Effects of the Training Dataset Characteristics on the Performance of Nine Species Distribution Models, Application to Diabrotica virgifera virgifera. PLoS ONE 6,e20957.10.1371/journal.pone.0020957]Search in Google Scholar
[Edvardsen, A., V. Bakkestuen, and R. Halvorsen. 2011. A fine-grained spatial prediction model for the red-listed vascular plant Scorzonera humilis. Nordic Journal of Botany 29,495–504.10.1111/j.1756-1051.2010.00984.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Elith, J., C. H. Graham, R. P. Anderson, M. Dudik, S. Ferrier, A. Guisan, R. J. Hijmans, F. Huettmann, J. R. Leathwick, A. Lehmann, J. Li, L. G. Lohmann, B. A. Loiselle, G. Manion, C. Moritz, M. Nakamura, Y. Nakazawa, J. M. Overton, A. T. Peterson, S. J. Phillips, K. Richardson, R. Scachetti-Pereira, R. E. Schapire, J. Soberon, S. Williams, M. S. Wisz, and N. E. Zimmermann. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29,129–151.10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Elith, J., S. J. Phillips, T. Hastie, M. Dudík, Y. E. Chee, and C. J. Yates. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions 17,43–57.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Engler, R., A. Guisan, and L. Rechsteiner. 2004. An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. Journal of Applied Ecology 41,263–274.10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00881.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Feeley, K. J., and M. R. Silman. 2011a. The data void in modeling current and future distributions of tropical species. Global Change Biology 17,626–630.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02239.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Feeley, K. J., and M. R. Silman. 2011b. Keep collecting, accurate species distribution modelling requires more collections than previously thought. Diversity and Distributions 17,1132–1140.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00813.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Fielding, A. H., and J. F. Bell. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24,38–49.10.1017/S0376892997000088]Search in Google Scholar
[Fitzpatrick, M. C., J. F. Weltzin, N. J. Sanders, and R. R. Dunn. 2007. The biogeography of prediction error, why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range? Global Ecology and Biogeography 16,24–33.10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00258.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Franklin, J. 2009. Mapping species distributions, spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511810602]Search in Google Scholar
[Guisan, A., O. Broennimann, R. Engler, M. Vust, N. G. Yoccoz, A. Lehmann, and N. E. Zimmermann. 2006. Using niche-based models to improve the sampling of rare species. Conservation Biology 20,501–511.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00354.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Guisan, A., and W. Thuiller. 2005. Predicting species distribution, offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology letters 8,993–1009.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Guisan, A., and N. E. Zimmermann. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135,147–186.10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Guisan, A., N. E. Zimmermann, J. Elith, C. H. Graham, S. Phillips, and A. T. Peterson. 2007. What matters for predicting the occurrences of trees, Techniques, data, or species’ characteristics? Ecological Monographs 77,615–630.10.1890/06-1060.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Halvorsen, R. 2012. A gradient analytic perspective on distribution modelling. Sommerfeltia 35,1–165.10.2478/v10208-011-0015-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Halvorsen, R. 2013. A maximum likelihood explanation of MaxEnt, and some implications for distribution modelling. Sommerfeltia 36,1–165.10.2478/v10208-011-0016-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Hanberry, B. B., H. S. He, and D. C. Dey. 2012. Sample sizes and model comparison metrics for species distribution models. Ecological Modelling 227,29–33.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.12.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. 2009. The elements of statistical learning. Data mining, inference, and prediction. Second Edition. Springer, New York.10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernandez, P. A., C. H. Graham, L. L. Master, and D. L. Albert. 2006. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography 29,773–785.10.1111/j.0906-7590.2006.04700.x]Search in Google Scholar
[IUCN. 2001. IUCN Red List categories and criteria, version 3.1. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaynes, E. T. 1957a. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Review 106,620–630.10.1103/PhysRev.106.620]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaynes, E. T. 1957b. Information theory and statistical mechanics 2. Physical Review 108,171–190.10.1103/PhysRev.108.171]Search in Google Scholar
[Kadmon, R., O. Farber, and A. Danin. 2003. A systematic analysis of factors affecting the performance of climatic envelope models. Ecological Applications 13,853–867.10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0853:ASAOFA]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamino, L. H. Y., J. R. Stehmann, S. Amaral, P. De Marco, T. F. Rangel, M. F. de Siqueira, R. De Giovanni, and J. Hortal. 2012. Challenges and perspectives for species distribution modelling in the neotropics. Biology Letters 8,324–326.10.1098/rsbl.2011.0942]Search in Google Scholar
[Kålås, J. A., Å. Viken, S. Henriksen, S. Skjelseth, and (Eds.). 2010. The 2010 Norwegian Red List for Species. Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre, Trondheim, Norway.]Search in Google Scholar
[Le Lay, G., R. Engler, E. Franc, and A. Guisan. 2010. Prospective sampling based on model ensembles improves the detection of rare species. Ecography 33,1015–1027.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06338.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Lim, B. K., A. T. Peterson, and M. D. Engstrom. 2002. Robustness of ecological niche modeling algorithms for mammals in Guyana. Biodiversity and Conservation 11,1237–1246.10.1023/A:1016038501986]Search in Google Scholar
[Lobo, J. M., A. Jiménez-Valverde, and J. Hortal. 2010. The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling. Ecography 33,103–114.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06039.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Loe, L. E., C. Bonenfant, E. L. Meisingset, and A. Mysterud. 2012. Effects of spatial scale and sample size in GPS-based species distribution models, are the best models trivial for red deer management? European Journal of Wildlife Research 58,195–203.10.1007/s10344-011-0563-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Lomba, A., L. Pellissier, C. Randin, J. Vicente, F. Moreira, J. Honrado, and A. Guisan. 2010. Overcoming the rare species modelling paradox, a novel hierarchical framework applied to an Iberian endemic plant. Biological conservation 143,2647–2657.10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.007]Search in Google Scholar
[López-Cárdenas, J., F. E. G. Bravo, P. M. S. Schettino, J. C. G. Solorzano, E. R. Barba, J. M. Mendez, V. Sánchez-Cordero, A. T. Peterson, and J. Ramsey. 2005. Fine-scale predictions of distributions of Chagas disease vectors in the state of Guanajuato, Mexico. Journal of medical entomology 42,1068–1081.10.1603/0022-2585(2005)042[1068:FPODOC]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[Marini, M., M. Barbet-Massin, L. Lopes, and F. Jiguet. 2010. Predicting the occurrence of rare Brazilian birds with species distribution models. Journal of Ornithology 151,857–866.10.1007/s10336-010-0523-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Mateo, R. G., A. M. Felicísimo, and J. Muñoz. 2010. Effects of the number of presences on reliability and stability of MARS species distribution models, the importance of regional niche variation and ecological heterogeneity. Journal of Vegetation Science 21,908–922.10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01198.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Meggs, J. M., S. A. Munks, R. Corkrey, and K. Richards. 2004. Development and evaluation of predictive habitat models to assist the conservation planning of a threatened lucanid beetle, Hoplogonus simsoni, in north-east Tasmania. Biological conservation 118,501–511.10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Moen, A. 1999. National atlas of Norway, Vegetation. Norwegian Mapping Authority, Hønefoss.]Search in Google Scholar
[New, T. R. 2009. Insect species conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Papeş, M., and P. Gaubert. 2007. Modelling ecological niches from low numbers of occurrences, assessment of the conservation status of poorly known viverrids (Mammalia, Carnivora) across two continents. Diversity and Distributions 13,890–902.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00392.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearce, J., and S. Ferrier. 2000. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecological Modelling 133,225–245.10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00322-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearson, R. G., C. J. Raxworthy, M. Nakamura, and A. T. Peterson. 2007. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records, a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography 34,102–117.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Peterson, A. T., C. Martínez-Campos, Y. Nakazawa, and E. Martínez-Meyer. 2005. Time-specific ecological niche modeling predicts spatial dynamics of vector insects and human dengue cases. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 99,647–655.10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.02.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Peterson, A. T., J. Soberón, R. G. Pearson, R. P. Anderson, E. Martínez-Meyer, M. Nakamura, and M. B. Araújo. 2011. Ecological niches and geographic distributions. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.10.23943/princeton/9780691136868.003.0003]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillips, S. J., R. P. Anderson, and R. E. Schapire. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190,231–259.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillips, S. J., and M. Dudík. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent, new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31,161–175.10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillips, S. J., M. Dudík, and R. E. Schapire. 2004. A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling.in Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on machine learning. ACM, New York.10.1145/1015330.1015412]Search in Google Scholar
[Raes, N., and H. ter Steege. 2007. A null-model for significance testing of presence-only species distribution models. Ecography 30,727–736.10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05041.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Rebelo, H., and G. Jones. 2010. Ground validation of presence-only modelling with rare species, a case study on barbastelles Barbastella barbastellus (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae). Journal of Applied Ecology 47,410–420.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01765.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Reese, G. C., K. R. Wilson, J. A. Hoeting, and C. H. Flather. 2005. Factors affecting species distribution predictions, A simulation modeling experiment. Ecological Applications 15,554–564.10.1890/03-5374]Search in Google Scholar
[Renner, I. W., and D. I. Warton. 2013. Equivalence of MAXENT and Poisson point process models for species distribution modeling in ecology. Biometrics 69,274–281.10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01824.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Roura-Pascual, N., A. V. Suarez, C. Gómez, P. Pons, Y. Touyama, A. L. Wild, and A. T. Peterson. 2004. Geographical potential of Argentine ants (Linepithema humile Mayr) in the face of global climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 271,2527–253510.1098/rspb.2004.2898169189915615677]Search in Google Scholar
[SPWG. 2006. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 6.2. IUCN Gland, Switzerland; Cambridge, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stockwell, D. R. B., and A. T. Peterson. 2002. Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecological Modelling 148,1–13.10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00388-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Stokland, J. N., R. Halvorsen, and B. Støa. 2011. Species distribution modelling—Effect of design and sample size of pseudo-absence observations. Ecological Modelling 222,1800–1809.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.025]Search in Google Scholar
[Tibshirani, R. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological),267–288.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Van der Vaart, A. W. 1998. Asymptotic statistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.10.1017/CBO9780511802256]Search in Google Scholar
[Veloz, S. 2009. Spatially autocorrelated sampling falsely inflates measures of accuracy for presence-only niche models. Journal of Biogeography 36,2290–2299.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02174.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Whittaker, R. H. 1956. Vegetation of the great smoky mountains. Ecological Monographs 26,1–80.10.2307/1943577]Search in Google Scholar
[Wisz, M. S., R. J. Hijmans, J. Li, A. T. Peterson, C. H. Graham, and A. Guisan. 2008. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions 14,763–773.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00482.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Wollan, A. K., V. Bakkestuen, H. Kauserud, G. Gulden, and R. Halvorsen. 2008. Modelling and predicting fungal distribution patterns using herbarium data. Journal of Biogeography 35,2298–2310.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01965.x]Search in Google Scholar