1. bookVolumen 61 (2020): Edición 1 (March 2020)
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
2199-6059
ISSN
0860-150X
Primera edición
08 Aug 2013
Calendario de la edición
4 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés
Acceso abierto

The Interplay of Syntactic and Lexical Salience and its Effect on Default Figurative Responses

Publicado en línea: 20 Mar 2020
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 61 (2020) - Edición 1 (March 2020)
Páginas: 69 - 88
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
2199-6059
ISSN
0860-150X
Primera edición
08 Aug 2013
Calendario de la edición
4 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639Search in Google Scholar

Bergen, B. K. (2012). Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J. (2012). Shattering the bell jar: Metaphor, gender and depression. Metaphor and symbol, 27(3), 199–216.10.1080/10926488.2012.665796Search in Google Scholar

Coulson, S. (2008). Metaphor comprehension and the brain. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 177–194). New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Coulson, S., & van Petten, C. (2002). Conceptual integration and metaphor: an event-related potential study. Memory and Cognition, 30(6), 958–968.10.3758/BF03195780Search in Google Scholar

Coulson, S., & Lai, V. T. (2015). The metaphorical brain. Lausanne: Frontiers Media.Search in Google Scholar

Divjak, D. (2015). Exploring the grammar of perception. A case study using data from Russian. Functions of Language, 22(1), 44–68.Search in Google Scholar

Faucett, J. M., Risco, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2015). The handbook of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10033.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gentner, D., Bowdle, B. F., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 199–253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (1992). Categorization and metaphor understanding. Psychological Review, 99, 572–577.10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.572Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., & Matlock, T. (2008). Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 161–176). New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Giora, R. (1999). On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 919–929.10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00100-3Search in Google Scholar

Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999). Irony: Context and salience. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(4), 241–257.10.1207/S15327868MS1404_1Search in Google Scholar

Giora, R., Givoni, S., & Fein, O. (2015). Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(4), 290–313.10.1080/10926488.2015.1074804Search in Google Scholar

Giora, R., Jaffe, I., Becker, I., & Fein, O. (2018). Strongly mitigating a highly positive concept: The case of default sarcastic interpretations. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 19–47.10.1075/rcl.00002.gioSearch in Google Scholar

Givón, T. (1987). Beyond foreground and background. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 175–168). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., & Bookin, H. B. (1982). On understanding non-literal speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1, 85–96.10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90467-4Search in Google Scholar

Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97(1), 3–18.10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3Search in Google Scholar

Gold, R., & Faust, M. (2010). Right hemisphere dysfunction and metaphor comprehension in young adults with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(7), 800–811.10.1007/s10803-009-0930-1Search in Google Scholar

Golubkova, E. E. (2014). Ispolzovaniye lingvisticheskih korpusov pri reshenii semanticheskikh problem. In V. I. Zabotkina & E. E. Golubkova (Eds.), Metody kognitivnogo analiza semantiki slova: Komputerno-korpusnyi podkhod (pp. 34–75). Moscow: Yazyki Slavianskoi Kultury. (In Russ.).Search in Google Scholar

Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A. (Eds.) (2006). Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197709Search in Google Scholar

Hetmański, M. (2015). Metaphoric confinement of information. Studies in Logic, Grammar, and Rhetoric, 40(53), 161–178.10.1515/slgr-2015-0009Search in Google Scholar

Iakimova, G., Passerioux, C., Denhière, G., Laurent, J.-P., Vistoli, D., Vilain, J., & Hardy-Baylé, M.-C. (2010). The influence of idiomatic salience during the comprehension of ambiguous idioms by patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 177(1–2), 46–54.10.1016/j.psychres.2010.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Iriskhanova, O. (2014). Igry fokusa v yazyke: Semantika, sintaksis i pragmatika defokusirovaniya. Moscow: Yazyki Slavianskoi Kultury. (In Russ.).Search in Google Scholar

Kauschke, C., Mueller, N., Kircher, T., & Nagels, A. (2018). Do patients with depression prefer literal or metaphorical expressions for internal states? Evidence from sentence completion and elicited production. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1326.10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01326Search in Google Scholar

Kazmerski, V. A., Blasko, D. G., & Dessalegn, B. G. (2003). ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 31(5), 673–689.10.3758/BF03196107Search in Google Scholar

Kiose, M. (2018). Factors of co-referent indirect names interpretation in text: Cognitive analysis – statistics – experiment. Issues in Cognitive Linguistics (Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki), 3, 16–26. (In Russ.).10.20916/1812-3228-2018-3-16-26Search in Google Scholar

Kintsch, W., & Bowles, A. (2002). Metaphor comprehension: What makes a metaphor difficult to understand? Metaphor and Symbol, 17(4), 249–262.10.1207/S15327868MS1704_1Search in Google Scholar

Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading. The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 12–35.Search in Google Scholar

MacKay, G., & Shaw, A. (2004). A comparative study of figurative language in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 20, 13–32.10.1191/0265659004ct261oaSearch in Google Scholar

National corpus of the Russian language. Retrieved from http://www.ruscorpora.ru/Search in Google Scholar

Norbury, C. F. (2005). The relationship between theory of mind and metaphor: Evidence from children with language impairment and autistic spectrum disorder. Developmental Psychology, 23(3), 383–399.10.1348/026151005X26732Search in Google Scholar

Pynte, J., Besson, M., Robichon, F.-H., & Poli, J. (1996). The time-course of metaphor comprehension: an event-related potential study. Brain and Language, 316, 293–316.10.1006/brln.1996.0107Search in Google Scholar

Rapp, A. M., Felsenheimer, A. K., Langohr, K., & Klupp, M. (2017). The comprehension of familiar and novel metaphoric meanings in schizophrenia: A pilot study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2251.Search in Google Scholar

Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372Search in Google Scholar

Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Ritchie, D. (2013). Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139136822Search in Google Scholar

Rundblad, G., & Annaz, D. (2010). The atypical development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension in children with autism. Autism, 14, 29–46.10.1177/1362361309340667Search in Google Scholar

Semino, E., & Short, M. (2004). Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thought presentation in a corpus of English writing. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203494073Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, H.-J. (2007). Entrenchment, salience, and basic levels. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 117–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Staub, A. (2015). Reading sentences: Syntactic parsing and semantic interpretation. In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 202–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Steen, G., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.14Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. 1. Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tomlin, R. S. (1987). Linguistic reflections of cognitive events. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 455–479). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.6Search in Google Scholar

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In A. Tversky & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 3–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Verhagen, A. (2007). Construal and perspectivization. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 48–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Vulchanova, M., Saldańa, D., Chahboun, S., & Vulchanov, V. (2015). Figurative language processing in atypical populations: the ASD perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 24.10.3389/fnhum.2015.00024Search in Google Scholar

Wårwik, B. (2004). What is foregrounded in narratives? Hypotheses for the cognitive basis of foregrounding. In T. Virtanen (Ed.), Approaches to cognition through text and discourse (pp. 99–122). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo