Assessment of the Influence of Postdilution Online Hemodiafiltration on the Rate of Removal of Middle Molecular Weight Uremic Toxins

1 Cozzolino M, Mangano M, Stucchi A, Ciceri P, Conte F, Galassi A. Cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018; 33(1): 28-34. Search in Google Scholar

2 Ahmadmehrabi S, Tang WHW. Hemodialysis-induced Cardiovascular Disease. Semin Dial. 2018; 31(3): 258-67. Search in Google Scholar

3 Wolley MJ, Hutchison CA. Large uremic toxins: an unsolved problem in end-stage kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018; 33(Suppl 3): 6-11. Search in Google Scholar

4 Kaesler N, Babler A, Floege J, Kramann R. Cardiac Remodeling in Chronic Kidney Disease. Toxins. 2020; 12(3): 161. Search in Google Scholar

5 Lekawanvijit S. Cardiotoxicity of Uremic Toxins: A Driver of Cardiorenal Syndrome. Toxins. 2018; 10(9): 352. Search in Google Scholar

6 Velasquez MT, Centron P, Barrows I, Dwivedi R, Raj DS. Gut Microbiota and Cardiovascular Uremic Toxicities. Toxins. 2018; 10(7): 287. Search in Google Scholar

7 Mair RD, Sirich TL, Meyer TW. Uremic Toxin Clearance and Cardiovascular Toxicities. Toxins. 2018; 10(6): 226. Search in Google Scholar

8 Fujii H, Goto S, Fukagawa M. Role of Uremic Toxins for Kidney, Cardiovascular, and Bone Dysfunction. Toxins. 2018; 10(5): 202. Search in Google Scholar

9 Dias GF, Bonan NB, Steiner TM, Tozoni SS, Rodrigues S, Nakao LS, et al. Indoxyl Sulfate, a Uremic Toxin, Stimulates Reactive Oxygen Species Production and Erythrocyte Cell Death Supposedly by an Organic Anion Transporter 2 (OAT2) and NADPH Oxidase Activity-Dependent Pathways. Toxins. 2018; 10(7): 280. Search in Google Scholar

10 Sahathevan S, Khor BH, Ng HM, Gafor AHA, Daud ZAM, Mafra D, et al. Understanding Development of Malnutrition in Hemodialysis Patients: A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2020; 12(10): 3147. Search in Google Scholar

11 Tattersal JE, Ward RA. Online haemodiafiltration: definition, dose quantification and safety revisited. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013; 28(3): 542-50. Search in Google Scholar

12 Chapdelaine I, De Roij van Zuijewijn CLM, Mostovaya IM, Levesque R, Davenport A, Blankestijn PJ, et al. Optimization of the convection volume in online postdilution haemodiafiltration: practical and technical issues. Clin Kidney J. 2015; 8(2): 191-8. Search in Google Scholar

13 Perez-Garcia R, Alcazar R. The dialyser in the year 2017: Much more than a membrane. Nefrologia. 2018; 38(1): 4-7. Search in Google Scholar

14 De Roij van Zuijdewijn CLM, Chapdelaine I, Nube MJ, Blankestijn PJ, Bots ML, Konings CJAM, et al. Achieving high concentration volumes in postdilution online hemodiafiltration: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Kidney J. 2017; 10(6): 804-12. Search in Google Scholar

15 Marcelli D, Scholz C, Ponce P, Sousa T, Kopperschmidt P, Grassmann A, et al. High-Volume Postdilution Hemodiafiltration Is a Feasible Option in Rutine Clinical Practice. Artif Organs. 2015; 39(2): 142-9. Search in Google Scholar

16 Jaćović S, Jovanović M, Hamzagić N, Pavlović R, Petrović D. Erythropoietin Resistance in Hemodialysis Patients. Acta Fac Med Naiss. 2019; 36(1): 5-14. Search in Google Scholar

17 Liakopoulos V, Roumeliotis S, Gorny X, Dounousi E, Mertens PR. Oxidative stress in Hemodialysis Patients: A Review of the Literature. Oxidative Med Cell Long. 2017:2017:3081856. Search in Google Scholar

18 Antić S, Draginić N, Nikolić T, Jeremić N, Petrović D. Oxidative stress in hemodialysis patients: pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical consequence and basic principles of treatment. Ser J Exp Clin Res. 2019; doi: 10.2478/sjecr-2019-0008. Search in Google Scholar

19 Antić S, Draginić N, Jovanović M, Nikolić T, Jeremić N, Živković V, Srejović I, Petrović D, Jakovljević V. The relation between oxidative stress and carotid artery atherosclerosis in hemodialysis patients. Ser J Exp Clin Res. 2022; 23(3):251-260. Search in Google Scholar

20 Liakopoulos V, Roumeliotis S, Bozikas A, et al. (2019). Antioxidant Supplementation in Renal Replacement Therapy Patients: Is There Evidence? Oxidative Med Cell Long. 2019;2019:9109473. Search in Google Scholar

21 Antić S, Draginić N, Pilčević D, Živković V, Srejović I, JeremićN, Petrović D, Jakovljević V. The influence of vitamin E coated dialysis membrane on oxidative stress during the single session of on-line hemodiafiltration. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2021; 78(5): 511-518. Search in Google Scholar

22 Mostovaya IM, Grooteman MPC, Basile C, Davenport A, De Roij van Zuijdewijn CLM, Wanner C, Nube MJ, Blankestijn PJ, on behalf of the EuDial group. High convection volume on online post-dilution haemodiafiltration: Relevance, safety and costs. Clin Kidney J. 2015; 8(4): 368-73. Search in Google Scholar

23 Canaud B, Barbieri C, Marcelli D, Bellocchio F, Bowry S, Mari F, et al. Optimal convection volume for improving patient outcomes in an international incident dialysis cohort treated with online hemodiafiltration. Kidney Int. 2015; 88(5): 1108-16. Search in Google Scholar

24 Blankestijn PJ, Grooteman MP, Nube MJ, Bots ML. Clinical evidence on haemodiafiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018; 33(Suppl 3): 53-8. Search in Google Scholar

25 Masacane I, Sakurai K. Current approaches to middle molecule removal: room for innovation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018; 33(Suppl 3): 12-21. Search in Google Scholar

26 Yamammoto S, Kazama JJ, Wakamatsu T, Takahashi Y, Kaneko Y, Goto S, Narita I. Removal of uremic toxins by renal replacement therapies: a review of current progress and future perspectives. Renal Replacement Therapy. 2016; 2: 43. Search in Google Scholar

27 Maduell F, Rodas L, Broseta JJ, Gomez M, Xipell M, Guillen E, et al. Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer versus Eight Hemodiafiltration Dialyzers: Comparison Using a Global Removal Score. Blood Purif. 2019; 48(2): 167-74. Search in Google Scholar

28 Fournier A, Birmele B, Francois M. Factors Associated with Albumin Loss in Post-Dilution Hemodiafiltration and Nutritional Consequences. Int J Artif Organs. 2015; 38(2): 76-82. Search in Google Scholar

29 Sahathevan S, Khor BH, Ng HM, Gafor AHA, Daud ZAM, Mafra D, Karupaiah T. Understanding Development of Malnutrition in Hemodialysis Patients: A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2020; 12: 3147. Search in Google Scholar

30 Wolley M, Jardine M, Hutchison CA. Exploring the Clinical Relevance of Providing Increased Removal of Large Middle Molecules. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018; 13(5): 805-14. Search in Google Scholar

31 Molina P, Vizcaino B, Molina MD, Beltran S, Gonzales-Moya M, Mora A, et al. The effect of high-volume online haemodiafiltration on nutritional status and body composition: the ProtEin Stores preservation (PESET) study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018; 33: 1223-35. Search in Google Scholar

32 Panichi V, Scatena A, Rosati A, Giusti R, Ferro G, Malagnino E, et al. High-volume online haemodiafiltration improves erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) resistance in comparison with low-flux bicarbonate dialysis: results of the REDERT study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015; 30: 682-9. Search in Google Scholar

33 Rosati A, Ravaglia F, Panichi V. Improving Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent Hyporesponsivenessin Hemodialysis Patients: The Role of Hepcidin and Hemodiafiltration Online. Blood Purif. 2018; 45(1-3): 139-46. Search in Google Scholar

34 Canaud B, Vienken J, Ash S, Ward R. Hemodiafiltration to Addres Unmet Medical Needs ESKD Patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018; 13(9): 1435-43. Search in Google Scholar

35 Florens N, Juillard L. Expanded haemodialysis: news from the field. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018; 33(Suppl 3): 48-52. Search in Google Scholar