This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Melton 3rd LJ, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, et al. Cost-equivalence of different osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2003; 14: 383–8.1273075010.1007/s00198-003-1385-4MeltonLJ3rdGabrielSECrowsonCSCost-equivalence of different osteoporotic fracturesOsteoporos Int2003143838Search in Google Scholar
Rüedi TP, Murphy WM. AO principles of fracture management. Stuttgart: Thieme. 2000; 441–4.RüediTPMurphyWMAO principles of fracture managementStuttgartThieme20004414Search in Google Scholar
Morris AH, Zuckerman JD, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Council of Health Policy and Practice. National Consensus Conference on Improving the Continuum of Care for Patients with Hip Fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84:670–4.10.2106/00004623-200204000-0002711940633MorrisAHZuckermanJDAmerican Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Council of Health Policy and PracticeNational Consensus Conference on Improving the Continuum of Care for Patients with Hip FractureJ Bone Joint Surg Am2002846704Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Davidovitch RI, Jordan CJ, Egol KA, et al. Challenges in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the non-elderly adult. J Trauma. 2010; 68(1):236–42.10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c428ceDavidovitchRIJordanCJEgolKAChallenges in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the non-elderly adultJ Trauma201068123642Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Abdel MP, Houdek MT, Watts CD, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98(4):468–74.27037428AbdelMPHoudekMTWattsCDLewallenDGBerryDJEpidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplastiesBone Joint J20169844687410.1302/0301-620X.98B4.37203Search in Google Scholar
Shane E, Burr D, Ebeling PR, et al. Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: report of a task force of the American society for bone and mineral research. J Bone Miner Res. 2010; 25:2267–94.10.1002/jbmr.25320842676ShaneEBurrDEbelingPRAtypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: report of a task force of the American society for bone and mineral researchJ Bone Miner Res201025226794Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bone LB, Johnson KD, Weigelt J, Scheinberg R. Early versus delayed stabilization of femoral fractures. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71:336–40.10.2106/00004623-198971030-000042925704BoneLBJohnsonKDWeigeltJScheinbergREarly versus delayed stabilization of femoral fractures. A prospective randomized studyJ Bone Joint Surg Am19897133640Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pervez H, Parker MJ. Results of the long Gamma nail for complex proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 2001; 32(9):704–7.10.1016/S0020-1383(01)00022-5PervezHParkerMJResults of the long Gamma nail for complex proximal femoral fracturesInjury20013297047Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nellaiyappan B, Ramesh Vyravan P, Mohankumar M, Doraikumar R. Complex Femoral Fractures - An Analysis. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2016; 15(3):10–5.NellaiyappanBRamesh VyravanPMohankumarMDoraikumarRComplex Femoral Fractures - An AnalysisJournal of Dental and Medical Sciences2016153105Search in Google Scholar
Aune AK, Ekeland A, Odegaard B, Grogaard B, Alho A. Gamma nail vs compression screw for trochanteric femoral fractures: 15 reoperations in a prospective, randomized study of 378 patients. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1994; 65(2):127–30.10.3109/17453679408995418AuneAKEkelandAOdegaardBGrogaardBAlhoAGamma nail vs compression screw for trochanteric femoral fractures: 15 reoperations in a prospective, randomized study of 378 patientsActa Orthopaedica Scandinavica1994652127308197841Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Halder SC. The Gamma nail for peritrochanteric fractures. Bone & Joint Journal. 1992; 74(3):340–4.HalderSCThe Gamma nail for peritrochanteric fracturesBone & Joint Journal1992743340410.1302/0301-620X.74B3.15878731587873Search in Google Scholar
van Doorn R, Stapert JW. The long gamma nail in the treatment of 329 subtrochanteric fractures with major extension into the femoral shaft. European Journal of Surgery. 2000; 166(3):240–6.10.1080/110241500750009357van DoornRStapertJWThe long gamma nail in the treatment of 329 subtrochanteric fractures with major extension into the femoral shaftEuropean Journal of Surgery20001663240610755340Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leung KS, So WS, Shen WY, Hui PW. Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws from peritrochanteric fractures. A randomized propective study in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992; 74-B-:345-51.10.1302/0301-620X.74B3.1587874LeungKSSoWSShenWYHuiPWGamma nails and dynamic hip screws from peritrochanteric fractures. A randomized propective study in elderly patientsJ Bone Joint Surg199274-B-345511587874Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, Calvert PT. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. Bone & Joint Journal. 1991; 73(2):330–4.BridleSHPatelADBircherMCalvertPTFixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screwBone & Joint Journal1991732330410.1302/0301-620X.73B2.20051672005167Search in Google Scholar
Parker MJ, Pryor GA. Gamma versus DHS nailing for extracapsular femoral fractures. Meta-analysis of ten randomized trials, Int Orthop. 1996; 20:163–8.10.1007/s0026400500558832319ParkerMJPryorGAGamma versus DHS nailing for extracapsular femoral fractures. Meta-analysis of ten randomized trialsInt Orthop19962016388832319Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Radford PJ, Needoff M, Webb JK. A prospective randomized comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993; 75-B:789–93.10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8376441RadfordPJNeedoffMWebbJKA prospective randomized comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nailJ Bone Joint Surg199375-B789938376441Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bhandari M, Schemitsch E, Jönsson A, Zlowodzki M, Haidukewych, GJ. Gamma nails revisited: gamma nails versus compression hip screws in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: a meta-analysis. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2009; 23(6):460–4.1955023510.1097/BOT.0b013e318162f67fBhandariMSchemitschEJönssonAZlowodzkiMHaidukewychGJGamma nails revisited: gamma nails versus compression hip screws in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: a meta-analysisJournal of orthopaedic trauma2009236460419550235Search in Google Scholar
Kempf I, Grosse A, Taglang G, Favreul E. Gamma nail in the treatment of closed trochanteric fractures. Results and indications of 121 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014; 100(1):75–83.2445676710.1016/j.otsr.2013.12.013KempfIGrosseATaglangGFavreulEGamma nail in the treatment of closed trochanteric fractures. Results and indications of 121 casesOrthop Traumatol Surg Res20141001758324456767Search in Google Scholar
Hesse B, Gächter A. Complications following the treatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma nail. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. 2004; 124(10):692–8.10.1007/s00402-004-0744-815517321HesseBGächterAComplications following the treatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma nailArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery200412410692815517321Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gadegone WM, Salphale YS. Proximal femoral nail: an analysis of 100 cases of proximal femoral fractures with an average follow up of 1 year. Int Orthop. 2007; 31:403–8.10.1007/s00264-006-0170-316823585GadegoneWMSalphaleYSProximal femoral nail: an analysis of 100 cases of proximal femoral fractures with an average follow up of 1 yearInt Orthop2007314038226760316823585Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Strauss EJ, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, Egol KA. The “Z-effect” phenomenon defined: a laboratory study. J Orthop Res. 2007; 25:1568–73.10.1002/jor.20457StraussEJKummerFJKovalKJEgolKAThe “Z-effect” phenomenon defined: a laboratory studyJ Orthop Res20072515687317592624Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wamper KE, Sierevelt IN, Poolman RW, Bhandari M, Haverkamp D. The Harris hip score: Do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics?: A systematic review. Acta Orthopaedica. 2010; 81(6):703–7.10.3109/17453674.2010.53780821110703WamperKESiereveltINPoolmanRWBhandariMHaverkampDThe Harris hip score: Do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics?: A systematic reviewActa Orthopaedica20108167037321608021110703Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Russell GV, Kregor PJ, Jarrett CA, Zlowodzki M. Complicated femoral shaft fractures. Orthopedic Clinics. 2002; 33(1):127–42.RussellGVKregorPJJarrettCAZlowodzkiMComplicated femoral shaft fracturesOrthopedic Clinics20023311274210.1016/S0030-5898(03)00076-2Search in Google Scholar
Warwick DJ, Crichlow TPKR, Langkamer VG, Jackson M. The dynamic condylar screw in the management of subtrochanteric fracture of the femur. Injury. 1995; 26:241–4.10.1016/0020-1383(95)90009-MWarwickDJCrichlowTPKRLangkamerVGJacksonMThe dynamic condylar screw in the management of subtrochanteric fracture of the femurInjury1995262414Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Siebenrock KA, Muller U, Ganz R. Indirect reduction with a condylar blade plate for osteosynthesis of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Injury. 1998; 29(Suppl. 3):7–15.10.1016/S0020-1383(98)95003-3SiebenrockKAMullerUGanzRIndirect reduction with a condylar blade plate for osteosynthesis of subtrochanteric femoral fracturesInjury199829Suppl. 3715Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Teitge RA. Subtrochanteric fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg. 1976;58-A:282.TeitgeRASubtrochanteric fracture of the femurJ Bone Joint Surg197658-A28210.2106/00004623-197658010-00035Search in Google Scholar
Pankovich AM, Trabishy IE. Ender nailing of intertrochanteric and sub trochantric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg. 1980;62-A:635–45.PankovichAMTrabishyIEEnder nailing of intertrochanteric and sub trochantric fractures of the femurJ Bone Joint Surg198062-A6354510.2106/00004623-198062040-00019Search in Google Scholar
Docquier PL, Manche E, Autrique JC, Geulette B. Complications associated with gamma nailing: a review of 439 cases. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica. 2002; 68(3):251–7.12152372DocquierPLMancheEAutriqueJCGeuletteBComplications associated with gamma nailing: a review of 439 casesActa Orthopaedica Belgica20026832517Search in Google Scholar
Borens O, Wettstein M, Kombot C, Chevalley F, Mouhsine E, Garofalo R. Long gamma nail in the treatment of subtrotrochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004; 124:443–7.15243759BorensOWettsteinMKombotCChevalleyFMouhsineEGarofaloRLong gamma nail in the treatment of subtrotrochanteric fracturesArch Orthop Trauma Surg2004124443710.1007/s00402-004-0711-4Search in Google Scholar
Ramakrishnan M, Prasad SS, Parkinson RW, Kaye JC. Management of subtrochanteric femoral fractures and metastases using long proximal femoral nail. Injury. 2004; 35:184–90.1473647810.1016/S0020-1383(03)00101-3RamakrishnanMPrasadSSParkinsonRWKayeJCManagement of subtrochanteric femoral fractures and metastases using long proximal femoral nailInjury20043518490Search in Google Scholar
Sehat K, Baker RP, Pattison G, Price R, Harries WJ, Chesser TJS. The use of the long gamma nail in proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 2005; 36(11):1350–4.10.1016/j.injury.2005.03.003SehatKBakerRPPattisonGPriceRHarriesWJChesserTJSThe use of the long gamma nail in proximal femoral fracturesInjury2005361113504Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Middleton RG, McNab IS, Hashemi-Nejad A, Noordeen MH. Multiple guide wire technique for removal of a short distal fragment of a fractured intramedullary nail. Injury 1993; 24:357–8.MiddletonRGMcNabISHashemi-NejadANoordeenMHMultiple guide wire technique for removal of a short distal fragment of a fractured intramedullary nailInjury199324357810.1016/0020-1383(95)00103-GSearch in Google Scholar
Aktselis I, Kokoroghiannis C, Fragkomichalos E, et al. Prospective randomised ontrolled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Int Orthop. 2014; 38(1):155–61.10.1007/s00264-013-2196-7AktselisIKokoroghiannisCFragkomichalosEProspective randomised ontrolled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femurInt Orthop201438115561389014724318319Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zhang L, Liu D, Wu ZD, He S, Huang ZY, Wang YJ. Biomechanical analysis of locking Gamma nail in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Orthop J China. 2010; 18:1028–9.ZhangLLiuDWuZDHeSHuangZYWangYJBiomechanical analysis of locking Gamma nail in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracturesOrthop J China20101810289Search in Google Scholar
Zhang L, Shen J, Chen S, et al. Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures with locking gamma nail (LGN): A retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Surgery. 2016; 26:12–17.10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.064ZhangLShenJChenSTreatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures with locking gamma nail (LGN): A retrospective cohort studyInternational Journal of Surgery201626121726718612Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Min WK, Kim SY, Kim TK, et al. Proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures compared with gamma nail. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2007; 63(5):1054–60.10.1097/01.ta.0000240455.06842.a0MinWKKimSYKimTKProximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures compared with gamma nailJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery200763510546017993950Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
