[
Borges, F., Borges, R., & Bourcier, D. (2003). Artificial neural networks and legal categorisation, In The 16th Annual Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX’03 ), The Netherlands, 11–12 December 2003, pp. 11–21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Camuñas-Mesa, L. A., Linares-Barranco, B., & Serrano-Go Gotarredona, T. (2019). Neuromorphic Spiking Neural Networks and Their Memristor-CMOS, Hardware Implementations. Materials 12, p. 2745.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EE 260 (Spring 2020). Advanced VLSI Design for Machine Learning and AI. Available at: https://vsclab.ece.ucr.edu/courses/2019/12/01/ee-260-spring-2020-advanced-vlsi-design-machine-learning-and-ai.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hage, J. C. (2005). Studies in Legal Logic, Dordrecht: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hart, H. L. A. (1958). Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals, Harvard Law Review 71/4, pp. 593–629.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The Concept of Law, 2nd edition, Oxford: Oxford Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hayek, F. A. (1976). Law Legislation and Liberty. Volume II. The Mirage of Social Justice, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hayek, F. A. (1977). New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haykin, S. (2006). Neural networks: a complete course, Moscow: William Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henderson, W. D. (2013). A Blueprint for Change. The Pepperdine Law Review 40/2, Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol40/iss2/7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hobson, J. B., & Slee, D. (1994). Indexing the Theft Act 1968 for case based reasoning and artificial neural networks, In Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Law, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, unnumbered additions, Exeter: Exeter University Centre for Legal Interdisciplinary Development.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hunter, D. (1994). Looking for law in all the wrong places: Legal theory and legal neural networks, In H. Prakken, A. J. Muntjewerff, A. Soeteman, and R. Winkels (eds.), Legal Knowledge Based Systems: The Relation with Legal Theory, Lelystad: Koninklijke Vermande, pp. 55–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire And Dangerous Things: What Categories Tell Us About The Nature Of Thought, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perelman, Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1971). The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, Paris: Notre Dame Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosenblatt, F. (1962). Principles of Neurodynamics: Perceptrons and the Theory of Brain Mechanisms, Washington: Spartan Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seger, C. A. & Peterson, E. J. (2013). Categorisation=Decision Making + Generalisation, Neuroscience & Biobehavioural Reviews 37/7, pp. 1187–1200.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stranieri, A., & Zeleznikow, J. (2005). Data Mining Using Neural Networks, In Knowledge Discovery from Legal Databases. Law and Philosophy Library, vol. 69, Dordrecht: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., Gawler, M., & Bryn, L. (1999). A Hybrid Rule – Neural Approach For The Automation of Legal Reasoning in The Discretionary Domain of Family Law in Australia, Artificial Intelligence and Law 7/2–3, pp. 153–183.
]Search in Google Scholar
