[1. Beall, J. C., and G. Restall. Logical Pluralism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288403.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Blanché, R. Les structures intellectuelles (Essai sur l’organisation systématique des concepts), Paris: Vrin, 1966.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. da Costa, N. C. On the theory of inconsistent formal systems, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15, 1974, pp. 497-510.10.1305/ndjfl/1093891487]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Demey, L., and H. Smessaert. Combinatorial Bitstring Semantics for Arbitrary Logical Fragments, Journal of Philosophical Logic 47, 2018, pp. 325-363.10.1007/s10992-017-9430-5]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Englebretsen, G. Knowledge, Negation, and Incompatibility, Journal of Philosophy 66, 1969, pp. 580-585.10.2307/2023970]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Frankowski, S. Formalization of a plausible inference, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 33, 2004, pp. 41-52.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Gardies, J.-L. La logique du temps, Paris, PUF, 1975.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Gauthier, Y. Hegel: introduction à une lecture critique, Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval, Coll. ‘Logique de la science’, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Lemanski, J, and F. Schang. A Bitstring Semantics for Calculus CL, Logica Universalis, forthcoming.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Łukasiewicz, J. On the Principle of Contradiction in Aristotle, Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejętności, 1910.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Łukasiewicz, J. On Three-valued Logic, Ruch Filozoficzny 5, 1920, pp. 170-171.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Malinowski, G. Q-Consequence Operation, Reports on Mathematical Logic 24, pp. 49-59.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Piaget, J. Traité de logique (Essai de logique opératoire), Paris: Dunod (1st edition: 1949).]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Priest, G. The Logic of the Catuskoti, Comparative Philosophy 1, 2010, pp. 32-54.10.31979/2151-6014(2010).010206]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Rogowski, S. The Logical Sense of Hegel’s Concept of Change and Movement, Studia Filozoficzne 6, 1961, pp. 3-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Schang, F. A Plea for Epistemic Truth: Jaina logic from a Many-Valued Perspective, In A. Schumann (ed.), Logic in Religious Discourse, De Gruyter, 2010, pp. 54-83.10.1515/9783110319576.54]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Schang, F. Negation and Dichotomy, In D. Łukasiewicz and R. Pouivet (eds.), Scientific Knowledge and Common Knowledge, Bydgoszcz: Epigram Publishing House/Kazimierz Wielki University Press, 2009, pp. 225-265.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Schang, F. Trois paralogismes épistémiques, une logique des énonciations, In P.-E. Bour, M. Rebuschi and L. Rollet (eds.), Construction. Festschrift for Gerhard Heinzmann, London: College Publications, 2010, pp. 407-416.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Schang, F. Two Indian Dialectical Logics: saptabhaṅgī and catuṣkoṭi, in A. Gupta and J. van Benthem (eds.), Studies in Logic: Logic and Philosophy Today 29, 2011, pp. 45-74.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Schang, F. A One-valued Logic for Non-One-Sidedness, International Journal of Jaina Studies (Online) 9 (1), 2013, pp. 1-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Schang, F. On Negating, In E. Dragalina-Chernaya (ed.), Ontology of Negativity, Moscow: Kanon, 2014, pp. 329-376.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Schang, F. Eastern Proto-logics, In J.-Y. Béziau, M. Chakraborty and S. Dutta (eds.), New Directions in Paraconsistent Logics, New Delhi: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, 2016, pp. 529-552.10.1007/978-81-322-2719-9_25]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Schang, F. From Aristotle’s Oppositions to Aristotelian Oppositions, In V. Petroff (ed.), The Legacies of Aristotle as Constitutive Element of European Rationality, Proceedings of the Moscow International Conference on Aristotle. RAS Institute of Philosophy, October 17-19, 2016, Moscow: Aquilo Press, 2017, pp. 430-445.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Schang, F. End of the square?, South American Journal of Logic 4 (2), 2018, pp. 1-21.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Schang, F. A General Semantics for Logics of Affirmation and Negation, Journal of Applied Logics 2020, forthcoming.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Schang, F. Question-Answer Semantics, Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporeâna, 8, 2020, pp. 73-102.10.26512/rfmc.v8i1.32835]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Suszko, R. The Fregean axiom and Polish mathematical logic in the 1920’s, Studia Logica 36, 1977, pp. 377-380.10.1007/BF02120672]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Turzynski, K. The Temporal Functors in the Directional Logic of Change of Rogowski – Some Results, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 19, 1990, pp. 30-32.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. von Wright, G. H. Truth, Negation and Contradiction, Synthese 66, 1986, pp. 3-14.10.1007/BF00413575]Search in Google Scholar
[30. von Wright, G. H. Truth-logics, Logique et Analyse 30, 1987, pp. 311-334.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Woleński, J. A Note on Scepticism, Kriterion 3, 1992, pp. 18-19.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Woleński, J. Against Truth as Coherence, Logic and Logical Philosophy 4, 1996, pp. 41-51.10.12775/LLP.1996.002]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Woleński, J. Scepticism and Logic, History and Philosophy of Logic 1, 1998, pp. 187-194.10.30965/26664275-00101010]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Woleński, J. The Principle of Bivalence and Suszko’s Thesis, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 38, 2009, pp. 99-110.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Woleński, J. An Abstract Approach to Bivalence, Logic and Logical Philosophy 23, 2014, pp. 3-15.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Woleński, J. Something, Nothing and Leibniz’s Question, Negation in Logic and Metaphysics, Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 54, 2018, pp. 175-190.10.2478/slgr-2018-0023]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Woleński, J. Logical Ideas of Jan Łukasiewicz, Studia Humana 8, 2019, pp. 3-7.10.2478/sh-2019-0011]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Zaitsev, D., and Y. Shramko. Bi-facial Truth: a Case for Generalized Truth Values, Studia Logica 101, 2013, pp. 1299-1318.10.1007/s11225-013-9534-z]Search in Google Scholar