Acceso abierto

Comparison of machine learning models predicting the pull-off strength of modified epoxy resin floors

,  y   
10 nov 2024

Cite
Descargar portada

Figure 1:

Diagram of the basic factors that damage epoxy resin floors.
Diagram of the basic factors that damage epoxy resin floors.

Figure 2:

Search volume chart for publications based on keywords in Google Scholar and Science Direct on 03/07/2024.
Search volume chart for publications based on keywords in Google Scholar and Science Direct on 03/07/2024.

Figure 3:

Granite powder used.
Granite powder used.

Figure 4:

Linen fibers used.
Linen fibers used.

Figure 5:

Pull-off test.
Pull-off test.

Figure 6:

Violin plot of the parameter: a) amount of Component A [%], b) amount of Component B [%], c) amount of granite powder [%], d) amount of linen fibers [%], e) density [g/cm3], and f) fb [MPa].
Violin plot of the parameter: a) amount of Component A [%], b) amount of Component B [%], c) amount of granite powder [%], d) amount of linen fibers [%], e) density [g/cm3], and f) fb [MPa].

Figure 7:

Pearson correlation matrix.
Pearson correlation matrix.

Figure 8:

Pull-off strength of the modified epoxy resin coating.
Pull-off strength of the modified epoxy resin coating.

Figure 9:

Relationship between the predicted value and the experimental value of the pull-off strength fb for the: a) RL model, b) ANN model, c) DT model, and d) RF model.
Relationship between the predicted value and the experimental value of the pull-off strength fb for the: a) RL model, b) ANN model, c) DT model, and d) RF model.

Figure 10:

Relative errors for data sets for selected artificial intelligence algorithms.
Relative errors for data sets for selected artificial intelligence algorithms.

Figure 11:

Histograms of absolute error values for a) ANN, b) DT, c) RF, and d) LR.
Histograms of absolute error values for a) ANN, b) DT, c) RF, and d) LR.

Figure 12:

Visualization of SHAP values for the RF ML model.
Visualization of SHAP values for the RF ML model.

Elements of the decision tree and random forest algorithm_

Number of input categories Depth of trees Number of trees (only for RF) Minimum subset to be divided Minimum number of categories in the leaf
5 1–20 20–200 5 2

Descriptive statistics of the input and output parameters_

Min. Max. St.dev. Mean Range
Amount of Component A [%] 0,455 0,752 0,077 0,560 0,297
Amount of Component B [%] 0,155 0,310 0,035 0,252 0,105
Amount of granite powder [%] 0,000 0,375 0,112 0,182 0,375
Amount of linen fibers [%] 0,000 0,015 0,005 0,006 0,015
Density [g/cm3] 1,100 1,306 0,060 1,196 0,206
fb [MPa] 1,950 3,520 0,223 2,546 1,570

Summary of correlation coefficients R, RMSE, and average percentage forecast errors MAPE for selected models_

AI Model Statistical metrics
R [-] RMSE [MPa] MAPE [%]
Linear regression 0,6277 0,2299 7,4244
Decision tree 0,8310 0,1643 4,0814
Random forest 0,8848 0,1376 3,7156
Artificial neural networks 0,8744 0,1312 3,8098