This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Alshibli A., K., Batiste S. N., Sture S. Strain localization in sand: plane strain versus triaxial compression. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE 2003; 129 (6); 483–494. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:6(483)AlshibliA., K.BatisteS. N.StureS.Strain localization in sand: plane strain versus triaxial compression20031296483494https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:6(483)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:6(483)Search in Google Scholar
Barreto D, O’Sullivan C. The influence of inter-particle friction and the intermediate stress ratio on soil response under generalised stress conditions. Granular Matter 2012;14(4); 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-012-0354-zBarretoDO’SullivanCThe influence of inter-particle friction and the intermediate stress ratio on soil response under generalised stress conditions2012144505521https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-012-0354-z10.1007/s10035-012-0354-zSearch in Google Scholar
Been, K. & Jefferies, M. G. (1985) A state parameter for sands. Geotechnique 1985; 35(2); 99–l 12. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.2.99BeenK.JefferiesM. G.1985A state parameter for sands198535299l12https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.2.9910.1680/geot.1985.35.2.99Search in Google Scholar
Been, K., Jefferies, M. G. Discussion on a state parameter for sands. Geotechnique 1986; 36(1); 123–132.BeenK.JefferiesM. G.Discussion on a state parameter for sands198636112313210.1680/geot.1986.36.1.123Search in Google Scholar
Bishop, A. W. Discussion on Soil Properties and Their Measurement. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering 1961; III; 92–100.BishopA. W.Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering1961III92100Search in Google Scholar
Bolton M.D. Strength and dilatancy, Geotechnique 1986; 36(1); 65–78. DOI: 10.1680/geot.1986.36.1.65BoltonM.D.Strength and dilatancy1986361657810.1680/geot.1986.36.1.65Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chakraborty T., Salgado R. Dilatancy and Shear Strength of Sand at Low Confining Pressure. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviromental Engineering 2010; 136(3); 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000237ChakrabortyT.SalgadoR.Dilatancy and Shear Strength of Sand at Low Confining Pressure20101363527532https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000023710.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000237Search in Google Scholar
Cornforth Derek H. Some Experiments on the Influence of Strain Conditions on the Strength of Sand. Geotechnique 1964; 14; 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1964.14.2.143Cornforth DerekH.Some Experiments on the Influence of Strain Conditions on the Strength of Sand196414143167https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1964.14.2.14310.1680/geot.1964.14.2.143Search in Google Scholar
Desrues, J., Viggiani, G. Strain localization in sand: an overview of the experimental results obtained in Grenoble using stereophotogrammetry. Int. J. Numer. Analyt. Methods Geomech. 2004; 28(4); 279 – 321. DOI: 10.1002/nag.338DesruesJ.ViggianiG.Strain localization in sand: an overview of the experimental results obtained in Grenoble using stereophotogrammetry200428427932110.1002/nag.338Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Deusdado N., Antao A. N., daSilva M. V., Guerra N. Application of the Upper and Lower-bound Theorems to Three-dimensional Stability of Slopes. Procedia Engineering, 2006; 143; 674–681. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.09DeusdadoN.AntaoA. N.daSilvaM. V.GuerraN.Application of the Upper and Lower-bound Theorems to Three-dimensional Stability of Slopes200614367468110.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.09Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Di Santolo S. A., Evangelista, A., Aversa, S. Upper and lower bound solution for dynamic active earth pressure on cantilever walls, 2012;, Italy: 15 WCEE, Lisbon.Di SantoloS. A.EvangelistaA.AversaS.2012Italy15 WCEE, LisbonSearch in Google Scholar
Drucker DC, Prager W. Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design. Journal of applied Mathematics 1952; 10; 157–165.DruckerDCPragerWSoil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design19521015716510.1090/qam/48291Search in Google Scholar
Eekelen H. A. M. Isotropic yield surfaces in three dimensions for use in soil mechanics. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 1980; 4(1); 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610040107EekelenH. A. M.Isotropic yield surfaces in three dimensions for use in soil mechanics19804189101https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.161004010710.1002/nag.1610040107Search in Google Scholar
Georgiadis K., Potts D. M., Zdravkovic L. Modelling the shear strength of soils in the general stress space. Computers and Geotechnics 2004; 31; 357–364. DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.05.002GeorgiadisK.PottsD. M.ZdravkovicL.Modelling the shear strength of soils in the general stress space20043135736410.1016/j.compgeo.2004.05.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Houlsby G. T. A general failure criterion for frictional and cohesive materials. Soils and Foundations 1986; 26(2); 97–101.HoulsbyG. T.A general failure criterion for frictional and cohesive materials19862629710110.3208/sandf1972.26.2_97Search in Google Scholar
Kulhawy, F. H., Mayne, P. W. Manual on Estimating Soil Properties for Foundation Design. Final Report. Project 1493–6, EL-6800, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA 1990.KulhawyF. H.MayneP. W.Final Report. Project 1493–6, EL-6800Electric Power Research InstitutePalo Alto, CA1990Search in Google Scholar
Lade, P. V., Duncan J., M., Elasto –plastic stress-strain theory for cohesionless soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 1975; 101; 1037–53.LadeP. V.DuncanJ. M.Elasto –plastic stress-strain theory for cohesionless soil197510110375310.1061/AJGEB6.0000204Search in Google Scholar
Lade, P. V., Duncan J., M., Cubical Triaxial Tests on Cohesionless Soils. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division 1973; 99; 793–812.LadeP. V.DuncanJ., M.Cubical Triaxial Tests on Cohesionless Soils19739979381210.1061/JSFEAQ.0001934Search in Google Scholar
Lagioia R, Panteghini A. The influence of the plastic potential on plane strain failure, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 2014; 38; 844–862. DOI: 10.1002/nag.2236LagioiaRPanteghiniA.The influence of the plastic potential on plane strain failure20143884486210.1002/nag.2236Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lee K. L. Comparison of plane strain and triaxial tests on sand. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division 1970; Proc. ASCE, SM3; 901–923.LeeK. L.Comparison of plane strain and triaxial tests on sand. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division 197090192310.1061/JSFEAQ.0001425Search in Google Scholar
Leśniewska D., Niedostatkiewicz M., J. Tejchman J. Experimental study on shear localization in granular materials within combined strain and stressfield. Strain; 47; 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1305.2012.00838.xLeśniewskaD.NiedostatkiewiczM.J. TejchmanJ.Experimental study on shear localization in granular materials within combined strain and stressfield47218231https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1305.2012.00838.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2012.00838.xSearch in Google Scholar
Li B., Chen L., Gutierrez M. Influence of the intermediate principal stress direction on the mechanical behavior of cohesionless soils using the discrete element method. Computers and Geotechnics 2017; 86; 52–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.01.004LiB.ChenL.GutierrezM.Influence of the intermediate principal stress direction on the mechanical behavior of cohesionless soils using the discrete element method201786526610.1016/j.compgeo.2017.01.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Li Y., Yang Y., Yu H.-S., Roberts G. Effect of sample reconstitution methods on the behaviors of granular materials under shearing. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 2018; 46; 20170126. doi:10.1520/JTE20170126. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20170126LiY.YangY.YuH.-S.RobertsG.Effect of sample reconstitution methods on the behaviors of granular materials under shearing20184620170126.10.1520/JTE20170126https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20170126Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Liu M., Gao Y., Liu H. A nonlinear Drucker-Prager and Matsuoka-Nakai unfied failure criterion for geomaterials with separated invariants. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 2012; 50; 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.01.002LiuM.GaoY.LiuH.A nonlinear Drucker-Prager and Matsuoka-Nakai unfied failure criterion for geomaterials with separated invariants201250110https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.01.00210.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.01.002Search in Google Scholar
Matsuoka H., Nakai T. Stress-deformation and strength characteristics of soil under three different principal stresses. Proc. Of Japan Society of Civil Engineers 1974; 232; 59–70. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej1969.1974.232_59MatsuokaH.NakaiT.Stress-deformation and strength characteristics of soil under three different principal stresses19742325970https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej1969.1974.232_5910.2208/jscej1969.1974.232_59Search in Google Scholar
Matsuoka H., Nakai T. Relationship among Tresca, Mises, Mohr-Coulomb and Matsuoka-Nakai failure criteria. Soils and Foundations 1985; 25(4); 123–128. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.25.4_123MatsuokaH.NakaiT.Relationship among Tresca, Mises, Mohr-Coulomb and Matsuoka-Nakai failure criteria1985254123128https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.25.4_12310.3208/sandf1972.25.4_123Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell J. K., Soga K. Fundamentals of Soil Behaviour 2005; John Wiley & Sons, INC.MitchellJ. K.SogaK.2005John Wiley & Sons, INCSearch in Google Scholar
Ochiai H, Lade P. V. Three-dimensional behaviour of sand with anisotropic fabric. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1983; 109(10); 1313–28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:10(1313)OchiaiHLadeP. V.Three-dimensional behaviour of sand with anisotropic fabric198310910131328https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:10(1313)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:10(1313)Search in Google Scholar
Rowe P. W. The relationship between the shear strength of sands in triaxial compression, plane strain and direct shear. Geotechnique 1969; 19(1); 75–86.RoweP. W.The relationship between the shear strength of sands in triaxial compression, plane strain and direct shear1969191758610.1680/geot.1970.20.2.215Search in Google Scholar
Sadrekarimi A., Olson S. M. Critical state friction angle of sands. Geotechnique 2011, 61(9); 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.090SadrekarimiA.OlsonS. M.Critical state friction angle of sands2011619771783https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.09010.1680/geot.9.P.090Search in Google Scholar
Sarkar D., Goudarzy M., Konig D. An interpretation of the influence of particle shape on the mechanical behaviour of granular material. Granular Matter 2019; 21(53); 1–24. DOI: 10.1007/s10035-019-0909-3SarkarD.GoudarzyM.KonigD.An interpretation of the influence of particle shape on the mechanical behaviour of granular material2019215312410.1007/s10035-019-0909-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schanz T., Vermeer P. A. Angles of friction and dilatancy of sand. Geotechnique 1996; 46(1); 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1996.46.1.145SchanzT.VermeerP. A.Angles of friction and dilatancy of sand1996461145151https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1996.46.1.14510.1680/geot.1996.46.1.145Search in Google Scholar
Shao, S., Shao, S.J., Zhang, Y. and Chen, C.L. Novel Soil Strength Criterion Compared with Conventional Criteria. Geomaterials 2017; 7; 25–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/gm.2017.71003ShaoS.ShaoS.J.ZhangY.ChenC.L.Novel Soil Strength Criterion Compared with Conventional Criteria201772539http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/gm.2017.7100310.4236/gm.2017.71003Search in Google Scholar
Sławińska J. The Mohr-Coulomb friction angle of granular soils under different stress conditions. Acta Sci. Pol. Architectura 2018, 17 (4); 51–60; DOI: 10.22630/ASPA.2018.17.4.40SławińskaJ.The Mohr-Coulomb friction angle of granular soils under different stress conditions2018174516010.22630/ASPA.2018.17.4.40Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tatsuoka F., Sakamoto M., Kawamura T, Fukushima S. Strength and Deformation Characteristics of Sand in Plane Strain Compression at Extremely Low Pressures. Soils and Foundations 1986; 26(1); 65–84. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.26.65TatsuokaF.SakamotoM.KawamuraTFukushimaS.Strength and Deformation Characteristics of Sand in Plane Strain Compression at Extremely Low Pressures19862616584https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.26.6510.3208/sandf1972.26.65Search in Google Scholar
Wanatowski D., Chu J. Static liquefaction of sand in plane strain. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2007; 44(3); 299–313. DOI: 10.1139/t06-078WanatowskiD.ChuJ.Static liquefaction of sand in plane strain200744329931310.1139/t06-078Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wanatowski D., Chu J., Loke W. L. Drained instability of sand in plane strain. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2010; 47(4); 400–412. DOI: 10.1139/T09-111WanatowskiD.ChuJ.LokeW. L.Drained instability of sand in plane strain201047440041210.1139/T09-111Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vikash G., Prashant A. Calibration of 3D Failure Criteria for Soils Using Plane Strain Shear Strength Data. Soil Behavior and Geo-Micromechanics. GeoShanghai 2010 International Conference. 86–91.VikashG.PrashantA.Soil Behavior and Geo-Micromechanics. GeoShanghai 2010 International Conference869110.1061/41101(374)14Search in Google Scholar
Yamamuro, J. A., Lade, P. V. (1996). Drained sand behavior in axisymmetric tests at high pressures. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE 1996; 122(2); 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:2(109)YamamuroJ. A.LadeP. V.1996Drained sand behavior in axisymmetric tests at high pressures19961222109119https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:2(109)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:2(109)Search in Google Scholar
Yang Z. X., Jardine R. J., Zhu B. T., Foray P., Tshuha C. H. C. Sand grain crushing and interface shearing during displacement pile installation in sand. Geotechnique 2010; 60(6); 469–782. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2010.60.6.469YangZ. X.JardineR. J.ZhuB. T.ForayP.TshuhaC. H. C.Sand grain crushing and interface shearing during displacement pile installation in sand2010606469782https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2010.60.6.46910.1680/geot.2010.60.6.469Search in Google Scholar