Iniciar sesión
Registrarse
Restablecer contraseña
Publicar y Distribuir
Soluciones de Publicación
Soluciones de Distribución
Temas
Arquitectura y diseño
Artes
Ciencias Sociales
Ciencias de la Información y Bibliotecas, Estudios del Libro
Ciencias de la vida
Ciencias de los materiales
Deporte y tiempo libre
Estudios clásicos y del Cercano Oriente antiguo
Estudios culturales
Estudios judíos
Farmacia
Filosofía
Física
Geociencias
Historia
Informática
Ingeniería
Interés general
Ley
Lingüística y semiótica
Literatura
Matemáticas
Medicina
Música
Negocios y Economía
Química
Química industrial
Teología y religión
Publicaciones
Revistas
Libros
Actas
Editoriales
Blog
Contacto
Buscar
EUR
USD
GBP
Español
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrito
Home
Revistas
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Volumen 43 (2021): Edición 3 (September 2021)
Acceso abierto
Usefulness of the CPTU method in evaluating shear modulus
G
0
changes in the subsoil
Zbigniew Młynarek
Zbigniew Młynarek
,
Jędrzej Wierzbicki
Jędrzej Wierzbicki
y
Tom Lunne
Tom Lunne
| 30 sept 2021
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Volumen 43 (2021): Edición 3 (September 2021)
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Resumen
Artículo
Figuras y tablas
Referencias
Autores
Artículos en este número
Vista previa
PDF
Cite
Compartir
Article Category:
Original Study
Publicado en línea:
30 sept 2021
Páginas:
195 - 205
Recibido:
22 dic 2020
Aceptado:
17 mar 2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2021-0008
Palabras clave
shear modulus
,
CPTU
,
non-cohesive soils
© 2021 Zbigniew Młynarek et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
Location of test sites on the territory of Poland.
Figure 2
The example of a set of shear wave readings for SDMT and SCPTU.
Figure 3
The example SCPTU profile at Gnojewo test site.
Figure 4
The example CPTU profile ‘A’ and SDMT results ‘B’ at Derkacze test site.
Figure 5
Trend of changes in shear modulus G0 with depth for SCPTU and SDMT performed in normally consolidated medium sands (data set from Derkacze and Gnojewo test sites).
Figure 6
Distribution of shear modulus population G0 from SCPTU and SDMT with respect to cone resistance qc (data set at all test sites).
Figure 7
Correlation between shear modulus G0 and cone resistance qc for the entire data population.
Figure 8
The correlation between modulus G0 and cone resistance qc taking into account the division into normally consolidated (blue) and overconsolidated (red) soils.
Figure 9
The correlation between modulus G0 and cone resistance qc for normally consolidated soils taking into account the type of soil.
Figure 10
The correlation between modulus G0 and cone resistance qc for overconsolidated soils taking into account the type of soil.
Figure 11
Comparison of G0 values measured and calculated on the basis of Eqs. (7–12) (red) and Eq. (13) (blue).
Figure 12
The correlation between G0 and the vertical stress (s’v0) for overconsolidated (OC) (red) and normally consolidated (NC) soils distinguishing between fine sands (FSa) from Gnojewo test site (dark yellow) and Holmen test site (light yellow) and medium sands (MSa), coarse sands (CSa) and sandy gravels (GrSa).
Figure 13
The correlation between G0 and the preconsolidation stress (σ’p) for overconsolidated (OC) (red) and normally consolidated (NC) soils distinguishing between fine sands (FSa) from Gnojewo test site (dark yellow) and Holmen test site (light yellow) and medium sands (MSa), coarse sands (CSa) and sandy gravels (GrSa).
Figure 14
Correlation between G0 and Dr determined based on Eq. (14) taking into account s’m0.