Acceso abierto

Statistical analysis of mechanical properties on the example of aggregates of Carpathian sandstones

 y   
24 sept 2020

Cite
Descargar portada

Figure 1

A simplified geological and structural map of the Polish Carpathians [5, 16, 23, 30].
A simplified geological and structural map of the Polish Carpathians [5, 16, 23, 30].

Figure 2

Los Angeles drum.
Los Angeles drum.

Figure 3

Sample before (a) and after (b) fragmentation test.
Sample before (a) and after (b) fragmentation test.

Figure 4

Micro-Deval drum.
Micro-Deval drum.

Figure 5

Sample before (a) and after (b) abrasion test.
Sample before (a) and after (b) abrasion test.

Figure 6

Histogram of beta distribution of resistance to fragmentation and abrasion: (a) Magura sandstone, (b) Cergos sandstone, (c) Krosno sandstone and (d) overall.
Histogram of beta distribution of resistance to fragmentation and abrasion: (a) Magura sandstone, (b) Cergos sandstone, (c) Krosno sandstone and (d) overall.

Figure 7

Function fitting for Magura sandstone: (a) linear, (b) exponential and (c) logarithmic.
Function fitting for Magura sandstone: (a) linear, (b) exponential and (c) logarithmic.

Figure 8

Function fitting for Cergos sandstone: (a) linear, (b) exponential and (c) logarithmic.
Function fitting for Cergos sandstone: (a) linear, (b) exponential and (c) logarithmic.

Figure 9

Function fitting for Krosno sandstone: (a) linear, (b) exponential and (c) logarithmic.
Function fitting for Krosno sandstone: (a) linear, (b) exponential and (c) logarithmic.

Figure 10

Function fitting for all tested sandstones: (a) linear, (b) exponential and (c) logarithmic.
Function fitting for all tested sandstones: (a) linear, (b) exponential and (c) logarithmic.

Figure 11

Regression analysis results: (a) linear, (b) exponential and (c) logarithmic.
Regression analysis results: (a) linear, (b) exponential and (c) logarithmic.

Figure 12

Residuals for all tested sandstones: (a) linear, (b) exponential and (c) logarithmic.
Residuals for all tested sandstones: (a) linear, (b) exponential and (c) logarithmic.

Regression statistics_

CoefficientsR squareStandard errort Statp-valueLower 95%Upper 95%
Linear function
Intersection0.4800,81292.1390.2240.822−3.7734.733
LA1.4860.07619.4442.02E-331.3341.638
Exponential function
Intersection6.6340,74262.2462.9520.0042.16811.099
exp^(0.034*LA)12.9040.81415.8452.24E-2711.28514.522
Logarithmic function
Intersection−103.3380,81617.330−14.0973.49E-24−117.908−88.768
ln(LA)44.2652.25219.6499.59E-3439.78848.743

Physico-mechanical properties of sandstones [12]_

Rock typeBulk density [Mg/m3]Absorbability [%]Dry condition compressive strength [MPa]Compressive strength after water absorption [MPa]
min–maxon averagemin–maxon averagemin–maxon averagemin–maxon average
Krosno sandstone2.31–2.712.640.25–3.701.5057–17812240–15389
Magura sandstone2.50–2.692.620.30–2.471.1291–20716459–194125
Cergos sandstone2.48–2.772.630.52–2.941.33115–20717094–173134

Statistical values of LA and MDE coefficients for Carpathian sandstone aggregates_

ValueLA coefficientMDE coefficient
OverallMagura sandstoneCergos sandstoneKrosno sandstoneOverallMagura sandstoneCergos sandstoneKrosno sandstone
Average26.6924.5423.6741.3240.1535.5337.3662.95
Minimum14.0014.0020.0024.3020.0020.0030.0035.20
Maximum56.0037.1028.6056.0084.2058.5047.0084.20
Standard deviation8.476.382.839.0813.9711.394.6715.15
Median24.3023.3523.1041.0038.1035.1537.4066.00
Coefficient of variation31.7626.0111.9621.9934.8032.0412.5024.07