[
Ahuja MR (2005) Polyploidy in gymnosperms revisited. Silvae Genetica 54: 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2005-001010.1515/sg-2005-0010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ahuja MR, Neale DB (2005) Evolution of Genome Size in Conifers. Silvae Genetica 54: 126-137. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2005-002010.1515/sg-2005-0020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ahuja MR, Devey ME, Grover AT, Jermstad KD, Neale DB (1994) Mapped DNA probes from loblolly pine can be used for restriction fragment length polymorphism mapping in other conifers. Theor. Appl.Genet. 88: 279–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0022363210.1007/BF0022363224186006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Armenise L, Simeone M, Piredda R, Schirone B (2012) Validation of DNA barcoding as an efficient tool for taxon identification and detection of species diversity in Italian conifers. Eur. J. Forest Res. 131: 1337-1353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0602-010.1007/s10342-012-0602-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aronen T, Ryynanen L (2012) Variation in telomere repeats of scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Tree Genetics and Genomes 8: 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-011-0438-710.1007/s11295-011-0438-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Auckland L, Johnston J, Price H, Bridgwater F, (2001) Stability of nuclear DNA content among divergent and isolated populations of Fraser fir. Can. J. Bot. 79: 1375–1378. https://doi.org/10.1139/b01-10410.1139/b01-104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bagal UR, Leebens-Mack JH, Lorenz WW, Dean JF (2012) The phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) gene family shows a gymnosperm-specific lineage. BMC Genomics 13: S1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-s3-s110.1186/1471-2164-13-S3-S1339442422759610
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ, Porter JM, Wojciechowski MF, Campbell CS, Donoghue MJ (1995) The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 82: 247–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/239988010.2307/2399880
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bateman RM, Hilton J, Rudall PJ (2006) Morphological and molecular phylogenetic context of the angiosperms: Contrasting the ’top-down’ and ’bottom-up’ approaches used to infer the likely characteristics of the first flowers. J. Exp. Bot. 57: 3471–3503. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl12810.1093/jxb/erl12817056677
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bautista R, Villalobos DP, Díaz-Moreno S, Cantón FR, Cánovas FM, Claros MG (2007) Toward a Pinus pinaster bacterial artificial chromosome library. Ann. For. Sci. 64:855–864. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:200706010.1051/forest:2007060
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennetzen JL, Ma J, Devos KM (2005) Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants. Ann. Bot. 95:127–132. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci00810.1093/aob/mci008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berube Y, Zhuang J, Rungis D, Ralph S, Bohlmann J, Ritland K (2007) Characterization of EST SSRs in loblolly pine and spruce. Tree Genet Genomes 3 :251– 259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-006-0061-110.1007/s11295-006-0061-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bogunic F, Muratovic E, Brown SC, Siljak-Yakovlev S (2003) Genome size and base composition of five Pinus species from the Balkan region. Plant Cell Reports 22:59-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-003-0653-210.1007/s00299-003-0653-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bogunic F, Muratovic E, Ballian D, Siljak-Yakovlev SS, Brown SC (2007) Genome size stability among five subspecies of Pinus nigra Arnold s.l. Environmental and Experimental Botany 59: 354-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.04.00610.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.04.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bobola MS, Smith DE, Klein AS (1992) Five major nuclear ribosomal repeats represent a large and variable fraction of the genomic DNA of Picea rubens and P. mariana. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9: 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a04070210.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040702
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brodribb TJ, Pitterman J, Coomes DA (2012) Elegance versus speed: examining the competition between conifer and angiosperm trees. International Journal of Plant Sciences 173: 673-694. https://doi.org/10.1086/66600510.1086/666005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown GR, Newton CH, Carlson JE (1998) Organization and distribution of a Sau3A tandem repeated DNA sequence in Picea (Pinaceae) species. Genome 41: 560–565. https://doi.org/10.1139/g98-05410.1139/g98-054
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cafasso D, Chinali G (2014) An ancient satellite DNA has maintained repetitive units of the original structure in most species of the living fossil plant genus Zamia. Genome 57: 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2013-013310.1139/gen-2013-0133
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cafasso D, Cozzolino S, De Luca P, Chinali G (2003) An unusual satellite DNA from Zamia paucijuga (Cycadales) characterised by two different organizations of the repetitive unit in the plant genome. Gene: 311: 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1119(03)00555-910.1016/S0378-1119(03)00555-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cafasso D, Cozzolino S, Vereecken NJ, De Luca P, Chinali G (2009) Organization of a dispersed repeated DNA element in the Zamia genome. Biologia Plantarum 53: 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-009-0005-310.1007/s10535-009-0005-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Campbell CS, Wright WA, Cox M, Vining TF, Majorc CS, Arsenaulta MP (2005) Nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) in Picea (Pinaceae): sequence divergence and structure. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.01010.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.01015737589
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chagne D, Chaumeil P, Ramboer A, Collada C, Guevara A, Cervera MT, Vendramin GG, Garcia V, Frigerio JMM, Echt C, Richardson T, Plomion C (2004) Cross-species transferability and mapping of genomic and cDNA SSRs in pines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109:1204–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1683-z10.1007/s00122-004-1683-z15448894
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chase MW, Reveal JL (2009) A phylogenetic classification of the land plants to accompany APGIII. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 161: 122-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.01002.x10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.01002.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christenhusz MJM, Reveal JL, Farjon A, Gardner MF, Mill RR, Chase MW (2011) A new classification and linear sequence of extant gymnosperms. Phytotaxa 19: 55-70. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.19.1.310.11646/phytotaxa.19.1.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christiakov DA, Hellemans B, Volckaert FAM (2006) Microsatellites and their genomic distribution, evolution, function and applications: A review with special reference to fish genetics. Aquqculture 255: 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.03110.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cullis CA, Griessem GP, Gorman SW, Teasdale RD (1988) The 25S, 18S, and 5S ribosomal RNA genes from Pinus radiata D. Don. In: Molecular Genetics of Forest Trees. Proc. 2nd Workshop IUFRO Working Party s2.04.06. Cheliak W M, Yapa A C (Eds).Canadian Forestry Service PNFI Inf. Rep. PI-X-80, pp.34–40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davies BJ, O‘Brien IEW, Murray BG (1997) Karyotypes, chromosome bands and genome size variation in New Zealand endemic gymnosperms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 208: 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0098544010.1007/BF00985440
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De La Torre AR, Piot A, Liu B, Wilhite B, Weiss M, Porth I (2020) Functional and morphological evolution in gymnosperms: A portrait of implicated gene families. Evolutionary Applications 13:210–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.1283910.1111/eva.12839693558631892953
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Devey ME, Fiddler TA, Liu BH, Knapp SJ, Neale DB (1994) An RFLP linkage map for loblolly pine based on three generation outbred pedigree. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0022363110.1007/BF0022363124186005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Echt CS, May-Marquardt TP (1997) Survey of microsatellite DNA in pine. Genome 40: 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1139/g97-00210.1139/g97-0029061909
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Echt CS, Saha S, Krutovsky KV, Wimalanathan K, Erpelding JE, Chun Liang C, Nelson CD (2011) An annotated genetic map of loblolly pine basedon micro-satellite and cDNA markers. BMC Genetics 12:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-12-1710.1186/1471-2156-12-17303814021269494
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elsik CG, Williams CG (2000) Retroelements contribute to the excess of low-cop number DNA in pine. Mol. Genet. Genomics 264: 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438000027910.1007/s00438000027911016832
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elsik CG, Williams CG (2001) Families of clustered microsatellites in a conifer genome. Mol. Genet. Genomics 265: 535-542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438010044310.1007/s00438010044311405637
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farhat P, Hidalgo O, Robert T, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Leitch I, Adams RP, Daghar Kharrat MB (2019a) Polyploidy in the genus Juniperus: an unexpectedly high rate. Frontiers in Plant Science 10: Article 676. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.0067610.3389/fpls.2019.00676654100631191584
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farhat P, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Adams RP, Daghar Kharrat MB, Robert T (2019b) Genome size variation and polyploidy in the geographical range of Juniperus sabina L. (Cupressaceae). Botany Letters. https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2019.161326210.1080/23818107.2019.1613262
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farhat P, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Hidalgo O, Rushforth K, Bartel JA, Valentin N, Leitch IJ, Adams RP (2021) Polyploidy in Cupressaceae: Discovery of a new naturally occurring tetraploid, Xanthocyparis vietnamensis. Journal of Systematics and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.1275110.1111/jse.12751
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flanary BE, Kletetschka G (2005) Analysis of telomere length and telomerase activity in tree species of various life-spans, and with age in the bristlecone pine Pinus longaeva. Biogerontology 6:101–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-005-3484-410.1007/s10522-005-3484-416034678
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fragniere Y, Betrisey S, Cardinaux L, Stoffe IM, Kozlowski L (2015) Fighting the last strand? A global analysis of the distribution and conservation status of gymnosperms. Journal of Biogeography 42: 809-820. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.1248010.1111/jbi.12480
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friesen N, Brandes A, Heslop-Harrison JS (2001) Diversity, origin, and distribution of retrotransposons (gypsy and copia) in conifers. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 1176–1188. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a00390510.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a00390511420359
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friis EM, Pedersen KR, Crane PR (2010) Diversity in obscurity: Fossil flowers and the early history of angiosperms. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365: 369– 382. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.022710.1098/rstb.2009.0227283825720047865
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fuchs J, Brandes A, Schubert I (1995) Telomere sequence localization and karyo-type evolution in higher plants. Plant Systematics and Evolution 196: 227– 241. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0098296210.1007/BF00982962
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garcia S, Ales Kova A, Leitch AR, Garnatje T (2017) Cytogenetic features of rRNA genes across land plants: analysis of the Plant rDNA database. The Plant Journal 89: 1020–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.1344210.1111/tpj.1344227943584
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gernandt DS, Liston A, Pinerod (2001) Variation in the nrDNA ITS of Pinus subsection Cembroides: implications for molecular systematic studies of pine species complexes. Molecular. Phylogenetics and Evolution 21: 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2001.102610.1006/mpev.2001.102611741386
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gorelick R, Fraser D, Zonneveld BJM, Little DP (2014) Cycad (Cycadales) chromo-some numbers are not correlated with genome size. Int. J. Plant Sci. 175:986-997. https://doi.org/10.1086/67808510.1086/678085
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greilhuber J (2005) Intraspecific variation in genome size in angiosperms: identifying its existence. Ann. Bot. 95: 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci00410.1093/aob/mci004424670915596458
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greilhuber J, Leitch I (2013) Genome size and the phenotype. In: I.J. Leitch et al. (eds.), Plant Genome Diversity Volume 2, pp 323-344. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1160-4_2010.1007/978-3-7091-1160-4_20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grotkopp E, Rejmanek M, Rost TL (2002) Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. Am. Nat. 159:396–419. https://doi.org/10.2307/307924910.1086/33899518707424
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grotkopp E, Rejmanek M, Sanderson MJ, Rost TL (2004) Evolution of genome size in pines (Pinus) and its life-history correlates: supertree analysis. Evolution 58: 1705–1729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00456.x10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00456.x15446425
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guan R, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Fan G et al. (2016) Draft genome of the living fossil Ginkgo biloba. GigaScience 5: 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13742-016-0154-110.1186/s13742-016-0154-1511889927871309
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hall SE, Dvorak WS, Johnston JS, Price HJ, Williams CG (2000) Flow cytometric analysis of DNA content for tropical and temperate New World pines. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 86:1081–1086. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2000.127210.1006/anbo.2000.1272
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hamberger B, Hall D, Yuen M, Oddy C, Hamberger B et al. (2009) Targeted isolation, sequence assembly and characterization of two white spruce (Picea glauca) BAC clones for terpenoid synthase and cytochrome P450 genes involved in conifer defence reveal insights into a conifer genome. BMC Plant Biol. 9: 106. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-9-10610.1186/1471-2229-9-106272907719656416
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herbinger CM, Gordost K, Allen H (2011) Tetranucleotide and dinucleotide microsatellite markers for red spruce (Picea rubens). The Americas Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology 5 (Sp. Issue 2): 105-111.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hidalgo O, Vallès J, Romo A, Canela MA, Garnatje T (2015) Genome size variation in gymnosperms under different growth conditions. Caryologia. 68: 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2015.102454610.1080/00087114.2015.1024546
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hill K (2005) Diversity and evolution of gymnosperms. In: Henry RJ (ed.), Plant Diversity and evolution : Diversity and phenotypic Variation in Higher Plants CABI Publishing Wallingford, Oxfordshire UK. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851999043.002510.1079/9780851999043.0025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hizume M, Shibata F, Matsusakii Y, Kondo T (2000) Chromosomal localization of telomere sequence repeats in five gymnosperm species. Chromosome Science 4: 39-42
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hizume M, Shibata F, Murayama Y, Kondo T (2001) Cloning of DNA sequences localized on proximal fluorescent chromosome bands by microdissection in Pinus densiflora Sieb. Zucc. Chromosoma 110: 345-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412010014910.1007/s00412010014911685534
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hizume M, Shibata F, Matsusaki Y, Garajova Z (2002a) Chromosome identification and comparative karyotype analysis of Pinus species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 491-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-0975-410.1007/s00122-002-0975-412582496
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hizume M, Shibata F, Matsumoto A, Maruyama Y, Hayashi E, Kondo T, Kondo K, Zhang S (2002b) Tandem repeat DNA localising on the proximal DAPI bands of chromosomes of Larix, Pinaceae. Genome 45:777-783. https://doi.org/10.1139/g02-04110.1139/g02-04112175082
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hizume M, Shibata F, Kondo K, Hoshi Y, Kondo T, Ge S, Yang Q, Hong D (1999) Identification of chromosomes in two Chinese spruce species by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chromosome Sci. 3: 37–41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hung KH, Lin CY, Huang CC, Hwang CC, Hsu TW, Kuo YL, Wang WK, Hung CY, Chiang TY (2012) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from Pinus massoniana (Pinaceae). Botanical Studies (2012) 53: 191-196.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ickert-Bond SM, Wojciechowski MF (2004) Phylogenetic Relationships in Ephedra (Gnetales): Evidence from Nuclear and Chloroplast DNA Sequence Data. Systematic Botany 29: 834–849. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364404245114310.1600/0363644042451143
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ickert-Bond SM, Sousa A, Min Y, Loera I, Metzgar J, Pellicer J, Hidalgo O, Leitch I (2020) Polyploidy in gymnosperms-Insight into the genomic and evolutionary consequences of polyploidy in Ephedra. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 147: 106786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2020.10678610.1016/j.ympev.2020.10678632135310
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Joyner KL, Wang X-R, Johnston JS, Price HJ, Williams CG (2001) DNA content for Asian pines parallels New World relatives. Canadian Journal of Botany 79:192–196. https://doi.org/10.1139/b00-15110.1139/b00-151
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kamm A, Doudrick RL, Heslop-Harrison JS, Schmidt T (1996) The genomic and physical organizationof Ty1-Copia-like sequences as a component of large genomes in Pinus elliottii var. elliottii and other gymnosperms. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences USA 93: 2708–2713. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.7.270810.1073/pnas.93.7.2708396958610105
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kan XZ, Wang SS, Ding X, Wang XQ (2007) Structural evolution of nrDNA ITS in Pinaceae and its phylogenetic implications. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44:765-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.05.00410.1016/j.ympev.2007.05.00417596969
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelly LJ, Renny-Byfield S, Pellicer J, Macas J, Novak P, Neumann P, Lysak MA, Day PD, Berger M, Fay MF, Nichols RA, Leitch AR, Leitch IJ (2015) Analysis of the giant genomes of Fritillaria (Liliaceae) indicates that a lack of DNA removal characterizes extreme expansions in genome size. New Phytol 208:596– 607. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.1347110.1111/nph.13471474468826061193
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kenrick P, Crane PR (1997) The origin and early evolution of plants on land. Nature 389: 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/3791810.1038/37918
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kejnovsky E, Hawkins J, Feschotte C (2012) Plant transposable elements: biology and evolution. In: Wendel JF (ed) Plant genome diversity, vol 1, Plant genomes, their residents, and their evolutionary dynamics. Springer, Wien, New York, pp 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1130-7_210.1007/978-3-7091-1130-7_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khoshoo TN (1959) Polyploidy in gymnosperms. Evolution 13: 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1959.tb02991.x10.1111/j.1558-5646.1959.tb02991.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kinlaw CS, Gertulla SM, Carter MC (1994) Lipid transfer protein genes of loblolly pine are members of a complex gene family. Plant Molecular Biology 26:1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0004070210.1007/BF000407027811979
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kossack DS, Kinlaw CS (1999) IFG, a gypsy-like retrotransposon in Pinus (Pinaceae) has an extensive history in pines. Plant Mol. Biol. 39: 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:100611573262010.1023/A:1006115732620
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kovach A, Wegrzyn JL, Parra G, Holt C, Bruening GE et al. (2010) The Pinus taeda genome is characterized by diverse and highly diverged repetitive sequences. BMC Genomics 11: 420. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-42010.1186/1471-2164-11-420299694820609256
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kriebel HB (1985) DNA sequence components of the Pinus strobus nuclear genome. Can. J. For. Res. 15:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1139/x85-00110.1139/x85-001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kubis S, Schmidt T, Heslop-Harrison JS (1998) Repetitive DNA elements as a major component of plant genomes. Ann. Bot. 82:45-56. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1998.077910.1006/anbo.1998.0779
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kurdi-Haider B, Shalhoub V, Dib-Hajj S, Deeb S (1983) DNA sequence organization in the genome of Cycas revoluta. Chromosoma 88: 319-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0028585410.1007/BF00285854
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuzmin D, Feranchuk S, Sharov VV, Krutovsky KV (2019) Stepwise large genome assembly approach: A case of Siberian larch (Larix sibirica Ledeb). BMC Bioinformatics 20(Suppl 1):37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2570-y10.1186/s12859-018-2570-y636258230717661
]Search in Google Scholar
[
L’Homme Y, Segun A, Trembley FM (2000) Different classes of retrotransposons in coniferous spruce species. Genome 43: 1084–1089. https://doi.org/10.1139/g00-07710.1139/g00-077
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leitch AR, Leitch IJ (2012) Ecological and genetic factors linked to contrasting genome dynamics in seed plants. New Phytologist 194:629–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04105.x10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04105.x22432525
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leitch IJ, Hanson L, Winfield M, Parker J, Bennett MD (2001) Nuclear DNA C-values complete familial representation in gymnosperms. Annals of Botany 88: 843-849. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2001.152110.1006/anbo.2001.1521
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Nevo E (2004) Microsatellites within genes: structure, function, and evolution. Mol Biol Evol 21:991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msh07310.1093/molbev/msh07314963101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin X, Faridi N, Casola C (2016) An Ancient Transkingdom Horizontal Transfer of Penelope. Like Retroelements from Arthropods to Conifers. Genome Biol. Evol. 8:1252–1266. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evw07610.1093/gbe/evw076486070427190138
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liston A, Robinson WA, Oliphant JM, Alvarezbuylla ER (1996) Length variation in the nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region of non-flowering seed plants. Systematic Botany 21: 109–120. https://doi.org/10.2307/241974210.2307/2419742
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu W, Thummasuwan S, Sehgal SK, Chouvarine P, Peterson DG (2011) Characterization of the genome of bald cypress. BMC Genomics 12:553. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-55310.1186/1471-2164-12-553322885822077969
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu Y, El-Kassaby YA (2019) Novel insights into plant genome evolution and adaptation as revealed through transposable elements and non-coding RNAs in conifers. Genes 10:228. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes1003022810.3390/genes10030228647072630889931
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Magbanua, ZV, Ozkan S, Bartlett BD, Chouvarine P, Saski CA et al. (2011) Adventures in the enormous: a 1.8 million clone BAC library for the 21.7 Gb genome of loblolly pine. PLoS ONE 6: e16214. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.001621410.1371/journal.pone.0016214302502521283709
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maggini F, Baldassini S (1995) Ribosomal RNA genes in the genus Pinus. I. Caryologia 48: 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1995.1079731410.1080/00087114.1995.10797314
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maomao Yan XD, Shuxian L, Tongming Y (2012) A meta-analysis of EST-SSR sequences in the genomes of pine, poplar and eucalyptus. Tree Genetics and Molecular Breeding 2:1–7. https://doi.org/10.5376/tgmb.2012.02.000110.5376/tgmb.2012.02.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miksche JP, Hotta Y (1973) DNA base composition and repetitious DNA in several conifers. Chromosoma 41: 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0028407210.1007/BF00284072
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morgante M, Hanafey M, Powell W (2002) Microsatellites are preferentially associated with nonrepetitive DNA in plant genomes. Nature Genetics 30: 194-200. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng82210.1038/ng82211799393
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morse AM, Peterson DG, Islam-Faridi MN, Smith KE, Magbanua Z, Garcia SA, Kubisiak TL, Amerson HV, Carlson JE, Nelson CD et al. (2009) Evolution of genome size and complexity in Pinus. PLoS ONE 4: e4332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.000433210.1371/journal.pone.0004332263304019194510
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mosca E, Cruz F, Gómez-Garrido J, Bianco L, Rellstab C, Brodbeck S, Csilléry K, Fady B, Fladung M et al. (2019) A Reference Genome Sequence for the European Silver Fir (Abies alba Mill.): A Community-Generated Genomic Resource. G3 Genes/Genomes/Genetics 9:2039. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.40008310.1534/g3.119.400083664387431217262
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murray BG (1998) Nuclear DNA amounts in gymnosperms. Annals of Botany 82: 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1998.076410.1006/anbo.1998.0764
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murray BG (2005) When does intraspecific C-value variation become taxonomically significant? Annals of Botany 95: 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci00710.1093/aob/mci007424671215596461
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murray BG (2013) Karyotype Variation and Evolution in Gymnosperms. In: I.J. Leitch et al. (eds.), Plant Genome Diversity Volume 2, pp. 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1160-4_1410.1007/978-3-7091-1160-4_14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murray BG, Friesen N, Heslop-Harrison JS (2002) Molecular cytogenetic analysis of Podocarpus and comparison with other gymnosperm species. Annals of Botany 89: 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf04710.1093/aob/mcf047423386512096809
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neale DB, Wegrzyn JL, Stevens KA, Zimin AV, Puiu D et al. (2014) Decoding the massive genome of loblolly pine using haploid DNA and novel assembly strategies. Genome Biology 2014, 15:R59. doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r59. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r5910.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r59405375124647006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neale DB, McGuire PE, Wheeler NC, Stevens KA, Crepeau MW, Cardeno C, Zimin AV, Puiu D, Pertea GM, Sezen UU, Casola C, Koralewski TE, Paul R, Gonzalez-Ibeas D, Zaman S, Cronn R, Yandell M, Holt C, Langley CH, Yorke JA, Steven L. Salzberg SL, Jill L, Wegrzyn JL (2017) The Douglas-Fir Genome sequence reveals specialization of the photosynthetic Apparatus in Pinaceae. G3 Genes/Genomes/Genetics 7:3157. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.30007810.1534/g3.117.300078559294028751502
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nunes JD, Torres GA, Davide LC, de Campos JMS (2009) Chromosome banding and DNA content in tropical Pinus species. Scientia Forestalis, Piracicaba 37: 213-218.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nystedt B, Street NR, Wetterbom A, Zuccolo A, Lin YC, Scofield DG, Vezzi F, Delhomme N, Giacomello S, Alexeyenko A et al. (2013) The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature 497: 579–584. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1221110.1038/nature1221123698360
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ohri D (1998) Genome size variation and plant systematic. Annals of Botany 82: 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1998.076510.1006/anbo.1998.0765
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ohri D (2005) Climate and growth form: the consequences for genome size in plants. Plant Biology 7: 449-458. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-86587810.1055/s-2005-86587816163609
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ohri D (2015) How small and constrained is the genome size of angiosperm woody species. Silvae Genetica 64: 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2015-000210.1515/sg-2015-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ohri D (2021a) Polyploidy in gymnosperms – a reappraisal. Silvae Genetica 70: 22-38. https://doi.org/10.2478/sg-2021-000310.2478/sg-2021-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ohri D (2021b) Karyotype evolution in conifers. Feddes Repertorium. https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.20210001410.1002/fedr.202100014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ohri D, Khoshoo TN (1986) Genome size in gymnosperms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 153: 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0098942110.1007/BF00989421
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oliveira EJ, Pádua JG, Zucchi MI, Vencovsky R, Vieira MLC (2006) Origin, evolution and genome distribution of microsatellites. Genetics and Molecular Biology 29: 294-297. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-4757200600020001810.1590/S1415-47572006000200018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paton AJ, Brummitt N, Govaerts R, Harman K, Hinchcliffe S, Allkin B, Lughadha EN (2008) Towards target 1 of the global strategy for plant conservation: A working list of all known plant species—progress and prospects. Taxon 57: 602–611.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pellicer J, Leitch IJ (2019) The Plant C-value data base (Release 7.1): an updated repository of plant genome size data for comparative studies. New Pytolo-gist 226: 301-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.1626110.1111/nph.1626131608445
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pellicer J, Hidalgo O, Dodsworth S, Leitch IJ (2018) Genome Size Diversity and Its Impact on the Evolution of Land Plants. Genes 9: 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes902008810.3390/genes9020088585258429443885
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perera D, Magbanua ZV, Thummasuwan S, Mukherjee D, IIa MA, Chouvarinee P, Nairn CJ, Schmutzh J, Grimwood J, Deang JFD, Peterson DG (2018) Exploring the loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) genome by BAC sequencing and Cot analysis. Gene 663: 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.04.02410.1016/j.gene.2018.04.02429655895
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perry DL, Furnier GR (1996) Pinus banksiana has at least seven expressed alcohol dehydrogenase genes in two linked groups. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences USA 93: 13020–13023. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.23.1302010.1073/pnas.93.23.13020240398917537
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pfeiffer A, Olivieri AM, Morgante M (1997) Identification and characterization of icrosatellites in Norway spruce (Picea abies K.). Genome 40:411–419. https://doi.org/10.1139/g97-05510.1139/g97-0559276931
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puttick MN, Clark J, Donoghue PCJ (2015) Size is not everything: rates of genome size evolution, not C-value, correlate with speciation in angiosperms. Proc. R. Soc. B 282: 20152289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2289.10.1098/rspb.2015.2289468578526631568
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rake AV, Miksche JP, Hall RB, Hansen KM (1980) DNA reassocitation kinetics of four conifers. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 22: 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1139/g80-01010.1139/g80-010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ranade SS, Lin YC, Zuccolo A, Van de Peer Y, García-Gil M del R (2014) Comparative in silico analysis of EST-SSRs in angiosperm and gymnosperm tree genera. BMC Plant Biology 14:220. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-014-0220-810.1186/s12870-014-0220-8416055325143005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rastogi S, Ohri D (2020a) Chromosome numbers in gymnosperms-An update. Silvae Genetica 69: 13-19. https://doi.org/10.2478/sg-2020-000310.2478/sg-2020-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rastogi S, Ohri D (2020b) Karyotype evolution in cycads. Nucleus 63: 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-019-00302-210.1007/s13237-019-00302-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romo A, Hidalgo O, Boratynski A, Sobierajska K, Jasinka A, Vallès J, Garnatje T (2013) Genome size and ploidy levels in highly fragmented habitats: the case of western Mediterranean Juniperus (Cupressaceae) with special emphasis on J. thurifera L. Tree Genetics and Genomes 9: 587-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-012-0581-910.1007/s11295-012-0581-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rueda M, Godoy O, Hawkins BA (2017) Spatial and evolutionary parallelism between shade and drought tolerance explains the distributions of conifers in the conterminous United States. Global Ecology and Biogeography 26: 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.1251110.1111/geb.12511
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rungis D, Berube Y, Zhang J, Ralph S, Ritland CE, Ellis BE, Douglas C, Bohlmann J, Ritland K (2004) Robust simple sequence repeat markers for spruce (Picea spp.) from expressed sequence tags. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109:1283–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1742-510.1007/s00122-004-1742-515351929
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salazar-Tortosa D, Castro J, Saladin B, Zimmermann NE, De Casas RR (2020) Arid environments select for larger seeds in pines (Pinus spp.). Evolutionary Ecology 34:11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-019-10016-110.1007/s10682-019-10016-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmidt A, Doudrick RL, Heslop-Harrison JS, Schmidt T (2000) The contribution of short repeats of low sequence complexity to large conifer genomes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122005144210.1007/s001220051442
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schubert I, Vu GTH (2016) Genome stability and evolution attempting a holistic view. Trends in Plant Science 21: 749-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.06.00310.1016/j.tplants.2016.06.00327427334
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seoane-Zonjic P, Cañas RA, Bautista R, Gómez-Maldonado J, Arrillaga I, Fernández-Pozo N, Claros MG, Cánovas FM, Ávila C (2016) Establishing gene models from the Pinus pinaster genome using gene capture and BAC sequencing. BMC Genomics 17:148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2490-z10.1186/s12864-016-2490-z476984326922242
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shibata F, Hizume M (2008) Comparative FISH karyotype analysis of 11 Picea species. Cytologia 73: 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.73.20310.1508/cytologia.73.203
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shibata F, Matsusaki Y, Hizume M (2005) AT-rich sequence containing Arabidopsis type telomere sequence and the chromosomal distribution in Pinus densiflora. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110: 1253-1258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-1960-510.1007/s00122-005-1960-515791450
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skinner JS, Timko MP (1998) Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) contains multiple expressed genes encoding light-dependent NADPH: protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR). Plant Cell Physiol. 39: 795–806. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a02943710.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a0294379787456
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smarda P, Horova L, Knapek O, Dieck H, Dieck M, Razna K, Hrubik P, Orloci L, Papp L, Vesela K, Vesely P, Bures P (2018) Multiple haploids triploids and tetraploids found in modern day `living fossil’ Ginkgo biloba. Horticulture Research 5:55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-018-0055-910.1038/s41438-018-0055-9616584530302259
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith DN, Devey ME (1994) Occurrence and inheritance of microsatellite loci in Pinus radiata. Genome 37: 977–983. https://doi.org/10.1139/g94-13810.1139/g94-1387828844
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soranzo N, Provan J, Powell W (1998) Characterisation of microsatellite loci in Pinus sylvestris L. Mol. Ecol. 7:1260-1261
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stevens KA et al. (2016) Sequence of the sugar pine megagenome. Genetics 204,1613–1626. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.116.19322710.1534/genetics.116.193227516128927794028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stival Sena J, Giguère I, Boyle B, Rigault P, Birol I, Zuccolo A, Ritland K, Ritland C, Bohlmann J, Jones S, Bousquet J, Mackay J (2014) Evolution of gene structure in the conifer Picea glauca: a comparative analysis of the impact of intron size. BMC Plant Biology 14:95. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/14/95.10.1186/1471-2229-14-95410804724734980
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stuart-Rogers C, Flavell AJ (2001) The evolution of Ty1-copia group retrotransposons in gymnosperms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a00378910.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a00378911158374
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Plant List (2010) Version 1 Published on the Internet; http://www.theplantlist.org/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Victoria FC, da Maia LC, de Oliveira AC (2011) In silico comparative analysis of SSR markers in plants. BMC Plant Biology 11:15.10.1186/1471-2229-11-15303730421247422
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vinogradov AE (1999) Intron-genome size relationship on a large evolutionary scale. J. Mol. Evol. 49: 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl0000656110.1007/PL00006561
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Von Stackelberg M, Rensing SA, Reski R (2006) Identification of genic moss SSR markers and a comparative analysis of twenty-four algal and plant gene indices reveal species-specific rather than group-specific characteristics of microsatellites. BMC Plant Biology 6:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-6-910.1186/1471-2229-6-9152643416734891
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voronova A, Belevich V, Korica A, Rungis D (2017) Retrotransposon distribution and copy number variation in gymnosperm genomes. Tree Genetics & Genomes 13:88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-017-1165-510.1007/s11295-017-1165-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voytas DF, Cummings MP, Konieczny A, Ausubel FM, Rodermel SR (1992) Copia-like retrotransposons are ubiquitous among plants. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences USA 89:7124–7128. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.15.712410.1073/pnas.89.15.7124496581379734
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wakamiya I, Newton RJ, Johnston JS, Price HJ (1993) Genome size and environmental factors in the genus Pinus. American Journal of Botany. 80: 1235–1241. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb15360.x10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb15360.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wakamiya I, Price HJ, Messina MG, Newton RJ (1996) Pine genome diversity and water relations. Physiologia Plantarum 96: 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1996.960103.x10.1034/j.1399-3054.1996.960103.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wan T, Liu ZM, Li LF, Leitch AR, Leitch IJ et al. (2018) A genome for gnetophytes and early evolution of seed plants. Nature Plants 4: 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-017-0097-210.1038/s41477-017-0097-229379155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang SQ, Ran JH (2014) Evolution and biogeography of gymnosperms. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 75: 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.02.00510.1016/j.ympev.2014.02.00524565948
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Warren RL, Keeling CI, Yuen MMS, Raymond A, Taylor GA et al. (2015) Improved white spruce (Picea glauca) genome assemblies and annotation of large gene families of conifer terpenoid and phenolic defense metabolism. The Plant Journal 83: 189–212.10.1111/tpj.1288626017574
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wegrzyn J, Lin B, Zieve J, Dougherty W, Martinez-Garcia P, Koriabine M, Holtz-Morris A, de Jong P, Crepeau M, Langley C et al. (2013) Insights into the loblolly pine genome: Characterization of BAC and fosmid sequences. PLoS ONE 8: e72439. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.007243910.1371/journal.pone.0072439376281224023741
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wegrzyn JL, Liechty JD, Stevens KA et al. (2014) Unique features of the loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) megagenome revealed through sequence annotation. Genetics 196: 891–909. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.15999610.1534/genetics.113.159996394881424653211
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wendel JF, Cronn RC, Alvarez I, Liu B, Small RL, Senchina DS (2002) Intron size and genome size in plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 2346–2352F https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a00406210.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a00406212446829
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Won H, Renner SS (2005) The internal transcribed spacer of nuclear ribosomal DNA in the gymnosperm Gnetum. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36 : 581–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.03.01110.1016/j.ympev.2005.03.01116099382
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yagi E, Akita T, Kawahara T (2011) A novel Au SINEsequence found in a gymnosperm, Genes Genet. Syst. 86: 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1266/ggs.86.1910.1266/ggs.86.1921498919
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yazdani R, Scott I, Jansson G, Plomion C, Mathur G (2003) Inheritance and diversity of simple sequence repeat (SSR) microsatellite markers in various families of Picea abies. Hereditas 138: 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-5223.2003.01524.x10.1034/j.1601-5223.2003.01524.x14641487
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zane L, Bargelloni L, Patarnello T (2002) Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Mol Ecol 11:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01418.x10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01418.x11903900
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zonneveld BJM, Lindstrom AJ (2016) Genome sizes for 71 species of Zamia (Cycadales: Zamiaceae) correspond with three different biogeographic regions. Nordic J. Bot. 34: 744-751. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.0109410.1111/njb.01094
]Search in Google Scholar