[
[1] Constantin, Z., Michael, D. “Multiple Criteria Decision Making - Applications in Management and Engineering”, Springer, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] Morteza, Y., Pascale, Z., Edmundas, K. Z., Zenonas, T. “A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems”, Management Decision, Emerald 57(9), pp. 2501 – 2519, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[3] Ayse, T. “Financial performance analysis of electricity generation companies with multi-criteria decision making: Entropy-based Cocoso method”, Business & Management Studies: An International Journal 9(2), pp.532–546, 2021. DOI: 10.15295/bmij.v9i2.1794
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[4] Alptekin, U., Figen, B., Lutfu, S., Darjan, K., Dragisa, S., Gabrijela, P. “Selection of insulation materials with PSI-CRITIC based CoCoSo method”, Journal of Construction, 20(2), pp. 382 – 392, 2021. DOI: 10.7764/RDLC.20.2.382
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[5] Erfan, B. T., Ali, E. T. “A Cluster-based Stratified Hybrid Decision Support Model under Uncertainty: Sustainable Healthcare Landfill Location Selection”, Applied Intelligence, pp. 1 – 10, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s10489-022-03335-4889866035280110
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[6] Morteza, Y., Zhi, W., Huchang, L., Audrius, B., Zenonas, T. “A grey combined compromise solution (CoCoSo-G) method for supplier selection in construction management”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 25(8), pp. 858 – 874, 2019. DOI: 10.3846/jcem.2019.11309
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[7] Xindong, P., Haihui, H. “Fuzzy decision making method based on CoCoSo with critic for financial risk evaluation”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 26(4), pp. 695 – 724, 2020. DOI: 10.3846/tede.2020.11920
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[8] Alptekin, U., Gabrijela, P., Pavle, R., Dragisa, S., Darjan, K. “A new hybrid fuzzy PSIPiprecia-Cocoso MCDM based approach to solving the transportation company selection problem”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 27(5), pp. 1227 – 1249, 2021. DOI: 10.3846/tede.2021.15058
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[9] Dragan, P., Goran, C. “The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC)”, Expert Systems with Applications 42, pp. 3016 – 3028, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[10] Radojko, L. “Application of MABAC Method in Evaluation of Sector Efficiency in Serbia”, Review of International Comparative Management 22(3), pp. 400 – 418, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11] Darko, B., Aleksandar, M. “Multicriteria decision-making related to flood protection of Arilje city”, 7th International scientific professional conference security and crisis management – theory and practice – safety for the future, Serbia, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12] Ankur, C., Suresh, K. J., Sachin, K. M. “Socio-technological framework for selecting suppliers of pharmaceuticals in a pandemic environment”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), 2022. DOI: 10.1108/JEIM-02-2021-0081
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[13] Zeljko, S., Dragan, P., Edmundas, K. Z., Goran, C., Olegas, P. “The Selection of Wagons for the Internal Transport of a Logistics Company: A Novel Approach Based on Rough BWM and Rough SAW Methods”, Symmetry, 9(11), pp. 1 – 25, 2017. DOI: 10.3390/sym9110264
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[14] Pijush, K. D. P., Sanjib, B., Saurabh, P., Dragan, M., Prasenjit, C. “A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Resource Selection in Mobile Crowd Computing”, Symmetry 13(9), pp. 1 – 51, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/sym13091713
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[15] Edmundas, K. Z., Jolanta, T., Krishnendu, A., Samarjit, K. “A Hybrid MCDM Technique for Risk Management in Construction Projects”, Symmetry 10(2), pp. 1 – 28, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/sym10020046
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[16] Milan, M., Marko, B., Goran, T. “Selection of the railroad container terminal in Serbia based on multi criteria decision making methods”, Decision Making: Applicatons in Management and Engineering, 1(2), pp. 1 – 15, 2018. DOI: 10.31181/dmame1802001m
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[17] Pamuca, D. S., Tarle, S. P., Parezanovi, T. “New hybrid multi-criteria decision-making DEMATEL -MAIRCA model: sustainable selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics centre”, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 31(1), pp. 1641 – 1665, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2018.1506706
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[18] Esra, A. “An analysis on turkey’s merger and acquisition activities: MAIRCA method”, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi 12(1), pp. 1 – 11, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19] Sema, K. K. “Evaluation of the Effect of COVID-19 on Countries’ Sustainable Development Level: A comparative MCDM framework”, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications 3(3), pp. 101 – 122, 2020. DOI: 10.31181/oresta20303101k
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[20] Sarfaraz, H. Z., Fatih, E., Dragan, P., Saulius, R. “Neighborhood selection for a newcomer via a novel BWM-based revised MAIRCA integrated model: a case from the Coquimbo-La Serena conurbation, Chile”, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 24(2), pp. 102 – 118, 2020. DOI: 10.3846/ijspm.2020.11543
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[21] Ghorabaee, M. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Amiri, M., Antucheviciene, J. “Evaluation by an Area-based Method of Ranking Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets (EAMRIT-2F) for Multi-criteria Group Decisionmaking”, Transformations in Business & Economics 15(3), pp. 76 – 95, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[22] Yazd, A. K., Hanne, T., Gomez, J. C. O., Alcaraz, J. L. G. “Finding the Best Third-Party Logistics in the Automobile Industry: A Hybrid Approach”, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, pp. 1 – 19, 2018. DOI: 10.1155/2018/5251261
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[23] Ieva, M. K., Ghorbani, S. “Supply chain contract selection in the healthcare industry: a hybrid mcdm method in uncertainty environment”, Independent journal of management and production 12(4) pp. 1160 – 1187, 2021. DOI: 10.14807/ijmp.v12i4.1356
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[24] Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. “A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations”, Computers & Industrial Engineering 112, pp. 156 – 174, 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.017
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[25] Trung, D. D., Thien, N. V. Nhu-Tung, N. “Application of TOPSIS Method in Multi-Objective Optimization of the Grinding Process Using Segmented Grinding Wheel”, Tribology in Industry 43(1), pp. 12 – 22, 2021. DOI: 10.24874/ti.998.11.20.12
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[26] Wisnuadi, A. R., Damayanti, R. W., Pujiyanto, E. “Multi Response Optimization of Internal Grinding Process Parameters for Outer Ring using Taguchi Method and PCRTOPSIS”, AIP Conference Proceedings 1931(1), pp. 1 – 6, 2018.10.1063/1.5024088
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[27] Kumar, J., Verma, R. K. “Experimental investigations and multiple criteria optimization during milling of Graphene Oxide (GO) doped epoxy/CFRP composites using TOPSISAHP hybrid module”, FME Transactions 48(3), pp. 628 – 635, 2020. DOI: 10.5937/fme2003628K
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[28] Trung, D. D. “A combination method for multi-criteria decision making problem in turning process”, Manufacturing Review 8(26), pp. 1 – 17, 2021. DOI: 10.1051/mfreview/2021024
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[29] Trung, D. D., Thinh, H. X. “A multi-criteria decision-making in turning process using the MAIRCA, EAMR, MARCOS and TOPSIS methods: A comparative study”, Advances in Production Engineering & Management 16(4) pp. 443 – 456, 2021. DOI: 10.14743/apem2021.4.412
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[30] Trung, D. D. “Application of EDAS, MARCOS, TOPSIS, MOORA and PIV Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Milling Process”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 71(2), pp. 69 – 84, 2021. DOI: 10.2478/scjme-2021-0019
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[31] Huu-Quang, N., Xuan-Hung, L., Thanh-Tu, N., Quoc-Hoang, T., Ngoc-Pi, V. “A Comparative Study on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in Dressing Process for Internal Grinding”, Machines 10(5), pp. 1 – 14, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/machines10050303
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[32] Huu-Quang, N., Van-Tung, N., Dang-Phong, P., Quoc-Hoang, T., Ngoc-Pi, V. “Multi-Criteria Decision Making in the PMEDM Process by Using MARCOS, TOPSIS, and MAIRCA Methods”, Applied sciences 12(8), pp. 1 – 11, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/app12083720
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[33] Varatharajulu, M., Muthukannan, D., Bhuvanesh Kumar, M., Jayaprakash, G., Baskar, N. “Multi criteria decision making through TOPSIS and COPRAS on drilling parameters of magnesium AZ91”, Journal of Magnesium and Alloys 3(38), pp. 1 – 18, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2021.05.006
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[34] Trung, D. D. “Application of TOPSIS and PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making in hard turning process”, Journal of Machine Engineering 21(4), pp. 57 – 71, 2021. DOI: 10.36897/jme/142599
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[35] Gunantara, N. “A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and its applications”, Cogent Engineering 5(1), pp. 1 – 21, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2018.1502242
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[36] Dragan, P., Zeljko, S., Sinisa, S. “A New Model for Determining Weight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM)”, Symmetry 10(9), pp. 1 – 22, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/sym10090393
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[37] Thien, N. V., Dung, H. T., Trung, D. D., Nhu-Tung, N. “Multi-Objective Optimization of turning process using VIKOR method”, Journal of Applied Engineering Science 19(4), pp. 868 – 873, 2021. DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-29654
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[38] Nhu-Tung, N., Trung, D. D. “Modeling and improvement of the surface roughness model in hole turning process 3X13 stainless steel by Johnson transformation”, International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development 10(3), pp. 12097 – 12110, 2020.10.24247/ijmperdjun20201157
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[39] Klocke, F., Brinksmeier E., Weinert K. “Capability Profile of Hard Cutting and Grinding Processes”, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 54(2), pp. 22 – 45, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60018-3
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[40] Ko, T. J., Kim H. S. “Surface Integrity and Machineability in Intermittent Hard Turning”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 18, pp. 168 – 175, 2001. DOI: 10.1007/s001700170072
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[41] Hwang, C.-L., Lai, Y.-J., Liu, T.-Y. “A new approach for multiple objective decision making”, Computers & Operations Research 20, pp. 889 – 899, 1993. DOI: 10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[42] Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. “Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC)”, Symmetry 13(4), pp. 1 – 20, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/sym13040525
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[43] Dawes R. M., Coorigan B. “Linear Models in Decision Malking”, Psychological Bulletin 81(2), pp. 95 – 106, 1974. DOI: 10.1037/h0037613
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[44] Einhorn, H. J., McCoach, W. “A Symble Multiattribute Utility Procedure for Evaluation”, Behavioral Scicence 22(4), pp. 270 – 282, 1997. DOI: 10.1002/bs.3830220405
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[45] Zeljko, S. “Decision-making in transport and logistics using integrated models”, The eighth international conference: Transport and logistics – University of NIS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, pp. 21 – 26, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[46] Bhosetty, B., Gurram, V. K., Kumba, A. B. “Effect of minimum quantity lubrication on surface roughness and temperature in milling of EN31 steel for die making”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 69(1), pp. 61 – 68, 2019. DOI: 10.2478/scjme-2019-0005
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[47] Manoj, M.,Gopal, A., Swati, D. C., Umesh, B.,Veerendra, P. “Effect of Machine Feed Rate on Kerf-Width, Material Removal Rate, and Surface Roughness in Machining of Al/SiC Composite Material with Wire Electrical Discharge Machine’, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of mechanical engineering 70(1), pp. 81 – 88, 2020. DOI: 10.2478/scjme-2020-0008
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[48] Trung, D. D. “The combination of Taguchi – Entropy – WASPAS – PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making when external cylindrical grinding of 65G steel”, Journal of Machine Engineering 21(4), pp. 90 – 105, 2021. DOI: 10.36897/jme/144260
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[49] Rekah R., Baskar N., Padmanaban M. R. A, Palanisamy A. “Optimization of Cylindrical Grinding Process Parameters Using Meta-Heuristic Algorithms”, Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences 27, pp. 389 – 395, 2020.10.56042/ijems.v27i2.45971
]Search in Google Scholar
