From Cradle to Plate: Analysing the Life Cycle Sustainability of Fish Feed Composition

[1] International Feed Industry Federation. Annual Report 2022–2023. 2024. [Online]. [Accessed 15.07.2024]. https://annualreport.ifif.org/wp-content/uploads/IFIF-Annual-Report-2022-2023-15-03-24.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[2] European Feed Manufacturers Federation. Feed and food 2023. 2024. [Online]. [Accessed 15.07.2024]. https://fefac.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/FF_2023.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[3] European Feed Manufacturers Federation. Feed Sustainability Charter 2030. 2020. [Online]. [Accessed 15.07.2024]. https://fefac.eu/home/fefac-feed-sustainability-charter-2030/ Search in Google Scholar

[4] European Feed Manufacturers Federation. Circular Feed – Optimised Nutrient Recovery Through Animal Nutrition. 2022. [Online]. [Accessed 15.07.2024]. https://fefac.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/FEFAC-Circular-Feed-Publication-13-June-2022.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[5] Good practices for the feed sector. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and International Feed Industry Federation, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1761en Search in Google Scholar

[6] European Parliament. Regulation (EC) No 767/2009 on the placing on the market and use of feed. Official Journal of the European Union 2018 L 229/1 Search in Google Scholar

[7] European Parliament. Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition. Official Journal of the European Union 2021 L 268/29 Search in Google Scholar

[8] European Feed Manufacturers Federation. PEFCR Feed for Food-Producing Animals. 2018. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Roques S., Deborde C., Richard N., Skiba-Cassy S., Moing A., Fauconneau B. Metabolomics and fish nutrition: a review in the context of sustainable feed development. Reviews in Aquaculture 2020:12(1):261–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12316 Search in Google Scholar

[10] European Feed Manufacturers Federation. Advanced feeding strategies for enhanced and circular sustainable livestock and aquaculture production. How do they work? 2023. Search in Google Scholar

[11] ISO. ISO 14040 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. 2006. Search in Google Scholar

[12] ISO. ISO 14044 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines. 2006. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Roy S. M., Machavaram R., Moulick S., Mukherjee C. K. Economic feasibility study of aerators in aquaculture using life cycle costing (LCC) approach. Journal of Environmental Manage 2022:302:114037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114037 Search in Google Scholar

[14] United Nations Environment Programme. Methodological Sheets for Subcategories in Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). 2021. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Craig S., Kuhn D. Understanding fish nutrition, feeds and feeding. 2017. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Aragão C., Gonçalves A. T., Costas B., Azeredo R., Xavier M. J., Engrola S. Alternative Proteins for Fish Diets: Implications beyond Growth. Animals 2022:12(9):1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091211 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Nasopoulou C., Zabetakis I. Benefits of fish oil replacement by plant originated oils in compounded fish feeds. A review. LWT 2012:47(2):217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.01.018 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kamalam B. S., Medale F., Panserat S. Utilisation of dietary carbohydrates in farmed fishes: New insights on influencing factors, biological limitations and future strategies. Aquaculture 2017:467:3–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.02.007 Search in Google Scholar

[19] Lerfall J., Bendiksen E. Å., Olsen J. V., Morrice D., Østerlie M. A comparative study of organic versus conventional farmed Atlantic salmon. I. Pigment and lipid content and composition, and carotenoid stability in ice-stored fillets. Aquaculture 2016:451:170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.09.013 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Zlaugotne B., Diaz Sanchez F. A., Pubule J., Blumberga D. Protein Alternatives for Use in Fish Feed – Life Cycle Assessment of Black Soldier Fly, Yellow Mealworm and Soybean Protein. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023:27(1):581–592. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0043 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Zlaugotne B., Diaz Sanchez F., Pubule J., Blumberga D. Life cycle assessment of fish feed for oil alternatives-environmental impact of microalgae, rapeseed and fish oil. Agronomy Research 2023:21(3):1351–1360. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.23.074 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Zlaugotne B., Diaz Sanchez F. A., Pubule J., Blumberga D. Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Microalgae and Synthetic Astaxanthin Pigments. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023:27(1):233–242. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0018 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Xiarchos I., Morozinis A. K., Charitidis C. Life cycle assessment and possible impacts of CFRPs for space applications. MATEC Web of Conferences 2019:304:07006. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201930407006 Search in Google Scholar

[24] UNEP. Methodological Sheets for Subcategories in Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). 2021. [Online]. [Accessed 11.07.2024]. Available: https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Methodological-Sheets_2021_final.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[25] Chakraborty S. TOPSIS and Modified TOPSIS: A comparative analysis. Decision Analytics Journal 2022:2:100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2021.100021 Search in Google Scholar

[26] García-Cascales M. S., Lamata M. T. On rank reversal and TOPSIS method. Math Computer Model 2012:56(5):123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.022 Search in Google Scholar