Assessing Biopolymer Packaging in the EU Market for Sustainable Bioeconomy Development

[1] Ferraz D., Pyka A. Circular economy, bioeconomy, and sustainable development goals: a systematic literature review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2023:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29632-0 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Sanz-Hernández A., Esteban E., Garrido P. Transition to a bioeconomy: Perspectives from social sciences. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019:224:107–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.168 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Saulius T., Piotrowski R., Stephan P., Robert M., Michael C. Jobs and wealth in the EU bioeconomy / JRC -Bioeconomics. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC) 2022. [Online]. [Accessed 06.12.2023]. Available: http://data.europa.eu/89h/7d7d5481-2d02-4b36-8e79-697b04fa4278 Search in Google Scholar

[4] European bioplastics. Bioplastics market development [Online]. [ Accessed 23.10.2023]. Available: https://docs.european-bioplastics.org/publications/market_data/2022/Report_Bioplastics_Market_Data_2022_short_version.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[5] European bioplastics. Market drivers and development [Online]. [Accessed 26.10.2023]. Available: https://www.european-bioplastics.org/market/market-drivers/ Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ibrahim N. I., Shahar F. S., Hameed Sultan M. T., Md Shah A. U., Azrie Safri S. N., Mat Yazik M. H. Overview of Bioplastic Introduction and Its Applications in Product Packaging. Coatings 2021:11(11):1423. https://doi.org/10.3390/COATINGS11111423 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Gill M. Bioplastic: A Better Alternative To Plastics. IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Applied Natural and Social Sciences 2014:2:8:115–120. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Iles A., Martin A.N. Expanding bioplastics production: sustainable business innovation in the chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 2013:45:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.008 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Boons F., Ludeke-Freund F. Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production 2013:45:9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ubando A. T., Felix C. B., Chen W. H. Biorefineries in circular bioeconomy: A comprehensive review. Bioresource Technology 2020:299:122585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122585 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Chiellini E., Cinelli P., Imam S. H., Mao L. Composite Films Based on Biorelated agro-Industrial Waste and Poly(vinyl alcohol). Preparation and Mechanical Properties Characterization. Biomacromolecules 2001:2(3):1029–1037. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm010084j Search in Google Scholar

[12] Nandakumar A., Chuah J. A., Sudesh K. Bioplastics: A boon or bane?. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021:147:111237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111237 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Panoutsou C., Eleftheriadis J., Nikolaou A. Biomass supply in EU27 from 2010 to 2030. Energy Policy 2009:37(12):5675–5686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.032 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Scarlat N., Martinov M., Dallemand J.F. Assessment of the availability of agricultural crop residues in the European Union: Potential and limitations for bioenergy use. Waste Management 2010:30(10):1889–1897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.04.016 Search in Google Scholar

[15] John R. P., Nampoothiri K. M, Pandey A. Solid-state fermentation for L-lactic acid production from agro wastes using Lactobacillus delbrueckii. Process Biochemistry 2006:41(4):759–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.09.013 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Chan J. X., Wong J. F., Hassan A., Zakaria Z. Bioplastics from agricultural waste. Biopolymers and Biocomposites from Agro-Waste for Packaging Applications 2021:141–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819953-4.00005-7 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Wang J., Liu S., Huang J., Qu Z. A review on polyhydroxyalkanoate production from agricultural waste Biomass: Development, Advances, circular Approach, and challenges. Bioresource Technology 2021:342:126008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126008 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Singh R., Sharma R., Shaqib M., Sarkar A., Chauhan K. D. Biodegradable polymers as packaging materials. Biopolymers & their Industrial Applications 2021:245–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819240-5.00010-9 Search in Google Scholar

[19] Thakur S., Chaudhary J., Sharma B., Verma A., Tamulevicius S., Thakur V. K. Sustainability of bioplastics: Opportunities and challenges. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 2018:13:68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.04.013 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Untoro A. A., Siagian H. N. Quo vadis steam power plant in Indonesia? Implementation of GE-McKinsey matrix analysis on creating the strategy for steam power plant business entity. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021:753:012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/753/1/012025 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Lenkova O. V. Corporate portfolio of the oil and gas production enterprise. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 2016:6(5):13–19. https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/2843 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Purwaningsih R., Prastawa H., Azzahra F., Maypemi N. P., Ulkhaq M. M. A Resource Allocation Model for Higher Education Based on The Combination of Efficiency Measurement and Market Position Mapping. Proceedings for the 3^rd Asia Pacific International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management 2022. https://doi.org/10.46254/ap03.20220055 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Amatulli C., Caputo T., Guido G. Strategic Analysis through the General Electric/McKinsey Matrix: An Application to the Italian Fashion Industry. International Journal of Business and Management 2011:6(5):61–75. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n5p61 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Shen L., Zhou J., Skitmore M., Xia B. Application of a hybrid Entropy-McKinsey Matrix method in evaluating sustainable urbanization: A China case study. Cities 2015:42:186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.006 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Mankhin B., Khan M. A., Begum M. E. A., Hossain M. I. Market attractiveness of pineapple and banana agroforestry systems of Madhupur Sal (Shorea robusta) forest: A sustainable way of generating income and conserving forests. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 2023:11:100475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100475 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Patel N., Blumberga D. Insights of Bioeconomy: Biopolymer Evaluation Based on Sustainability Criteria. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023:27(1):323–338. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0025 Search in Google Scholar

[27] Patel N., Feofilovs M., Romagnoli F. Carbon Footprint Evaluation Tool for Packaging Marketplace. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023:27(1):368–378. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0027 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Duric Z., Topler J. P. The Role of Performance and Environmental Sustainability Indicators in Hotel Competitiveness. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2021:13(12):6574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126574 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Heras-Saizarbitoria I., García M., Boiral O., Díaz de Junguitu A. The use of eco-efficiency indicators by environmental frontrunner companies. Ecological Indicators 2020:115:106451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106451 Search in Google Scholar

[30] Zihare L., Blumberga D. Market Opportunities for Cellulose Products From Combined Renewable Resources. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2017:19(1):33–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/rtuect-2017-0003 Search in Google Scholar

[31] Patel N., Feofilovs M., Blumberga D. Evaluation of bioresource value models: Sustainable development in the agriculture biorefinery sector. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 2022:10:100367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100367 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Gikunda R. M., Mokaya S. O., Wakhungu B. The application of McKinsey Matrix in determination of route attractiveness and resource allocation in Kenya Airways. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 2012:2(3):259–268. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Decuseara N. R. Using The General Electric/Mckinsey Matrix In The Process Of Selecting The Central And East European Markets. Management Strategies Journal 2013:19:1:59-66. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Cellulose Bioplastic Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Application [Online]. [Accessed 26.06.2023]. Available: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/cellulose-bioplastic-market-report Search in Google Scholar

[35] Mehmood A., Raina N., Phakeenuya V., Wonganu B., Cheenkachorn K. The current status and market trend of polylactic acid as biopolymer: Awareness and needs for sustainable development. Materials Today: Proceedings 2023:72:3049–3055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.387 Search in Google Scholar

[36] Starch-based Bioplastics Market Size, Share, Competitive Landscape and Trend Analysis Report, by Type, Technology and Application : Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast 2021-2030 [Online]. [Accessed 28.06.2023]. Available: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/starch-based-bioplastics-market Search in Google Scholar

[37] Lackner M. Biopolymers. Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Springer, New York 2015:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_91-1 Search in Google Scholar

[38] Molenveld K., Bos H., Food W., Research B. Biobased plastics 2020. Wageningen Food & Biobased Research 2020. https://doi.org/10.18174/534587 Search in Google Scholar

[39] Nielsen C., Ravn H. P., Nentwig W., Wade M. The giant hogweed best practice manual: guidelines for the management and control of an invasive weed in Europe. Forest & Landscape Denmark 2005:44:44. Search in Google Scholar

[40] Zeko-Pivac A., Tisma M., Znidarsic-Plazl P., Kulisic B., Sakellaris G., Hao J., Planinic M. The Potential of Brewer’s Spent Grain in the Circular Bioeconomy: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Front Bioengineering & Biotechnology 2022:10:870744. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.870744 Search in Google Scholar

[41] De Laurentiis V., Corrado S., Sala S. Quantifying household waste of fresh fruit and vegetables in the EU. Waste Management 2018:77:238–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.001 Search in Google Scholar

[42] Amaral H. R., Cipriano D. F., Santos M. S., Schettino M. A., Ferreti J. V. T., Meirelles C. S., Pereira V. S., Cunha A. G., Emmerich F. G., Freitas J. C. C. Production of high-purity cellulose, cellulose acetate and cellulose-silica composite from babassu coconut shells. Carbohydrate Polymers 2019:210:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.061 Search in Google Scholar

[43] Rossell C. E. V., Nonato R. V., Mantelatto P. E., Leal M. R. L. V. Integrated production of biodegradable plastic (PHB), sugar and ethanol in a sugar mill. International Sugar Journal 2002:104:1243:321–323. Search in Google Scholar

[44] Singh R., Kaur S., Sachdev P. A. A cost effective technology for isolation of potato starch and its utilization in formulation of ready to cook, non cereal, and non glutinous soup mix. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization 2021:15:3168–3181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00887-w Search in Google Scholar

[45] The polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) market size is estimated to be USD 62 million in 2020 and is projected to reach USD 121 million by 2025, at a CAGR of 14.2% between 2020 and 2025 [Online]. [Accessed 28.06.2023]. Available: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/02/10/2172884/0/en/The-polyhydroxyalkanoate-PHA-marketsize-is-estimated-to-be-USD-62-million-in-2020-and-is-projected-to-reach-USD-121-million-by-2025-at-a-CAGR-of-14-2-between-2020-and-2025.html Search in Google Scholar

[46] Momani B. L. Assessment of the Impacts of Bioplastics: Energy Usage, Fossil Fuel Usage, Pollution, Health Effects, Effects On the Food Supply, and Economic Effects Compared to Petroleum Based Plastics. An Interactive Qualifying Project Report. Worcester Polytechnic Institute 2009. https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/iqp-all/114 Search in Google Scholar

[47] Foroughi F., Ghomi E. R., Dehaghi F. M., Borayek R., Ramakrishna S. A Review on the Life Cycle Assessment of Cellulose: From Properties to the Potential of Making it a Low Carbon Material. Materials 2021:14(4):714. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040714 Search in Google Scholar

[48] Maraveas C. Production of Sustainable and Biodegradable Polymers from Agricultural Waste. Polymers 2020:12(5):1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12051127 Search in Google Scholar

[49] McAdam B., Fournet M. B., McDonald P., Mojicevic M. Production of Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and Factors Impacting its Chemical and Mechanical Characteristics. Polymers 2020:12(12):2908. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122908 Search in Google Scholar

[50] Vilpoux O, Averous L. Starch-based plastics. Technology, use and potentialities of Latin American starchy tubers 2004:521–553. Search in Google Scholar

[51] Mohanty A. K., Wibowo A., Misra M., Drzal L. T. Development of renewable resource-based cellulose acetate bioplastic: Effect of process engineering on the performance of cellulosic plastics. Polymer Engineering and Science 2003:43(5):1151–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.10097 Search in Google Scholar

[52] Patel N., Feofilovs M., Blumberga D. Agro Biopolymer: A Sustainable Future of Agriculture-State of Art Review. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):499–511. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0038 Search in Google Scholar

[53] Perera K. Y., Jaiswal A. K., Jaiswal S. Biopolymer-Based Sustainable Food Packaging Materials: Challenges, Solutions, and Applications. Foods 2023:12(12):2422. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12122422 Search in Google Scholar

[54] Ekins P., Zenghelis D. The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability. Sustainability Science 2021:16:949–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5 Search in Google Scholar