This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PEW, Goldburg R. Scientists Find That 30% of Global Fish Catch Is Unreported [Online]. [Accessed 18.04.2023]. Available: https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2016/01/19/scientists-find-that-30-percent-of-global-fish-catch-is-unreportedSearch in Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Rome: FAO, 2022.Search in Google Scholar
Vázquez J. A., et al. Production of Valuable Compounds and Bioactive Metabolites from By-Products of Fish Discards Using Chemical Processing, Enzymatic Hydrolysis, and Bacterial Fermentation. Mar. Drugs 2019:17(3):139. https://doi.org/10.3390/MD17030139Search in Google Scholar
Tanaka Y., Sakaki I., Ohkubo T. Extraction of Phospholipids from Salmon Roe with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide and an Entrainer. J. Oleo Sci. 2004:53(9):417–424. https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.53.417Search in Google Scholar
Kuvendziev S., et al. Supercritical fluid extraction of fish oil from common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) tissues. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018:133:528–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.11.027Search in Google Scholar
Binsi P. K., et al. Structural, functional and in vitro digestion characteristics of spray dried fish roe powder stabilised with gum arabic. Food Chem. 2017:221:1698–1708. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2016.10.116Search in Google Scholar
Rubio-Rodríguez N., et al. Supercritical fluid extraction of fish oil from fish by-products: A comparison with other extraction methods. J. Food Eng. 2012:109(2):238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.10.011Search in Google Scholar
Ferdosh S., et al. Quality of Tuna Fish Oils Extracted from Processing the By-Products of Three Species of Neritic Tuna Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2015:39(4):432–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12248Search in Google Scholar
Tzanavaras D., et al. Aqueous Extracts of Fish Roe as a Source of Several Bioactive Compounds. Sep. 2022:9(8):210. https://doi.org/10.3390/SEPARATIONS9080210Search in Google Scholar
Hernández-Ruiz K. L., et al. Hydroxyapatite recovery from fish byproducts for biomedical applications. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022:28:100726. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCP.2022.100726Search in Google Scholar
Adeoti I. A., Hawboldt K. A review of lipid extraction from fish processing by-product for use as a biofuel. Biom. Bioen. 2014:63:330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2014.02.011Search in Google Scholar
Atef M., Mahdi Ojagh S. Health benefits and food applications of bioactive compounds from fish byproducts: A review. J. Funct. Foods 2017:35:673–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFF.2017.06.034Search in Google Scholar
Sahena F., et al. PUFAs in Fish: Extraction, Fractionation, Importance in Health. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2009:8(2):59–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1541-4337.2009.00069.XSearch in Google Scholar
Science Direct. Clarias gariepinus. An overview [Online]. [Accessed 18.04.2023]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/clarias-gariepinusSearch in Google Scholar
Sarker M. Z. I., et al. Optimization of supercritical CO2 extraction of fish oil from viscera of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012:13(9):11312–11322. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms130911312Search in Google Scholar
Raventós M., Duarte S., Alarcón R. Application and Possibilities of Supercritical CO2 Extraction in Food Processing Industry: An Overview. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2002:8(5):269–284. https://doi.org/10.1106/108201302029451Search in Google Scholar
Tulej W., Głowacki S. Modeling of the Drying Process of Apple Pomace. Appl. Sci. 2022:12(3):1434. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031434Search in Google Scholar
Nowak D., Jakubczyk E. The Freeze-Drying of Foods. The Characteristic of the Process Course and the Effect of Its Parameters on the Physical Properties of Food Materials. Foods 2020:9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/FOODS9101488Search in Google Scholar
Dumay J., Barthomeuf C., Berge J. P. How enzymes may be helpful for upgrading fish by-products: Enhancement of fat extraction. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2004:13(2):69–84. https://doi.org/10.1300/J030v13n02_07Search in Google Scholar
Guedes M., et al. Aqueous Extracts of Fish Roe as a Source of Several Bioactive Compounds. Separ. 2022:9(8):210. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations9080210Search in Google Scholar
GGCPLC. Methyl Ester [Online]. [Accessed 18.04.2023]. Available: https://www.ggcplc.com/en/businesses/methylesterSearch in Google Scholar
Thermo Fischer Scientific. Methyl palmitate, 97% [Online]. [Accessed 29.04.2023]. Available: https://www.alfa.com/en/catalog/L05509/Search in Google Scholar
Thermo Fischer Scientific. Methyl stearate, 99% [Online]. [Accessed 18.04.2023]. Available: https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/A13265.06Search in Google Scholar
“Showing Compound Methyl linoleate (FDB012761) - FooDB.” https://foodb.ca/compounds/FDB012761 (accessed Apr. 18, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Tallima H., El Ridi R. Arachidonic acid: Physiological roles and potential health benefits – A review. J. Adv. Res. 2018:11:33. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JARE.2017.11.004Search in Google Scholar
Sigma Aldrich. Methyl linolenate [online]. [Accessed 18.04.2023]. Available: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/LV/en/product/sigma/l2626Search in Google Scholar
LGC Standards. Methyl Eicosapentaenoate [Online]. [Accessed 18.04.2023]. Available: https://www.trc-canada.com/product-detail/?M304160Search in Google Scholar