This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015 [Online]. [Accessed: 15.04.2023]. Available: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agendaSearch in Google Scholar
Acemoglu D., Aghion P., Barrage L., Hémous D. Climate change, directed innovation, and energy transition: The long-run consequences of the shale gas revolution. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers 2023:31657. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31657Search in Google Scholar
Sterner T., et al. Policy design for the Anthropocene. Nature Sustainability 2019:2(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0194-xSearch in Google Scholar
Eugster J. The impact of environmental policy on innovation in clean technologies. IMF Working Papers 2021:213:1–32. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513589930.001Search in Google Scholar
Sung B. Do government subsidies promote firm-level innovation? Evidence from the Korean renewable energy technology industry. Energy Policy 2019:132:1333–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.009Search in Google Scholar
Weko S., Goldthau A. Bridging the low-carbon technology gap? Assessing energy initiatives for the Global South. Energy policy 2022:169:113192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113192Search in Google Scholar
van Beek L, Oomen J, Hajer M, Pelzer P, van Vuuren D. Navigating the political: An analysis of political calibration of integrated assessment modelling in light of the 1.5 °C goal. Environmental Science & Policy 2022:133:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.03.024Search in Google Scholar
Gawel E., Lehmann P., Korte K. et al. The future of the energy transition in Germany. Energy, Sustainability and Society 2014:4(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-014-0015-7Search in Google Scholar
Jacobsson S. The emergence and troubled growth of a ‘biopower’ innovation system in Sweden. Energy Policy 2008:36(4):1491–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.12.013Search in Google Scholar
Gao Y., Tsai S. B., Xue X., Ren T., Du X., Chen Q., Wang J. An empirical study on green innovation efficiency in the green institutional environment. Sustainability 2018:10(3):724. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030724Search in Google Scholar
Probst B., Touboul S., Glachant M. et al. Global trends in the invention and diffusion of climate change mitigation technologies. Nature Energy 2021:6:1077–1086 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00931-5Search in Google Scholar
Pless J., Hepburn C., Farrell N. Bringing rigour to energy innovation policy evaluation. Nature Energy 2020:5:284–290. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0557-1Search in Google Scholar
Yu Y., Radulescu M., Ifelunini A. I. et al. Achieving carbon neutrality pledge through clean energy transition: Linking the role of green innovation and environmental policy in E7 countries. Energies 2022:15(17):6456. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176456Search in Google Scholar
Abdmouleh Z., Alammari R. A., Gastli A. Review of policies encouraging renewable energy integration & best practices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015:45:249–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.035Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt T., Sewerin S. Technology as a driver of climate and energy politics. Nature Energy 2017:2:17084. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.84Search in Google Scholar
Polzin F. Mobilizing private finance for low-carbon innovation–A systematic review of barriers and solutions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017:77:525–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.007Search in Google Scholar
Nesta L., Vona F., Nicolli F. Environmental policies, competition and innovation in renewable energy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2014:67(3):396–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.01.001Search in Google Scholar
Kuzemko C., Bradshaw M., Bridge G. et al. Covid-19 and the politics of sustainable energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science 2020:68:101685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101685Search in Google Scholar
Sharma G. D, et al. Revisiting conventional and green finance spillover in post-COVID world: Evidence from robust econometric models. Global Finance Journal 2022:51:100691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100691Search in Google Scholar
Han P., et al. Assessing the recent impact of COVID-19 on carbon emissions from China using domestic economic data. Science of the Total Environment 2021:750:141688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141688Search in Google Scholar
Gupta S. D. Dirty and clean technologies. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 2015:47(1):123–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2014.1Search in Google Scholar
Acemoglu D., Aghion P., Bursztyn L., Hemous D. The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review 2012:102(1):131–66. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131Search in Google Scholar
Acemoglu D., Akcigit U., Hanley D., Kerr W. Transition to clean technology. Journal of Political Economy 2016: 124(1):52–104. https://doi.org/10.1086/684511Search in Google Scholar
Arrow K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors. NJ: Princeton University Press, 1962. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400879762-024Search in Google Scholar
Stern N. The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434Search in Google Scholar
Nordhaus W. D. A review of the Stern review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature 2007:45(3):686–702. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.45.3.686Search in Google Scholar
Stavins R. N. Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments. In Handbook of Environmental Economics, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 2003:1:355–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0099(03)01014-3Search in Google Scholar
Goulder L. H., Stavins R. N. Challenges from state-federal interactions in US climate change policy. American Economic Review 2011:101(3):253–257. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.253Search in Google Scholar
Brink C., Vollebergh H. R., van der Werf E. Carbon pricing in the EU: Evaluation of different EU ETS reform options. Energy Policy 2016:97:603–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.023Search in Google Scholar
van den Bergh J., Savin I. Impact of carbon pricing on low-carbon innovation and deep decarbonisation: Controversies and path forward. Environ Resource Econ 2021:80:705–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00594-6Search in Google Scholar
Rausch S., Mowers M. Distributional and efficiency impacts of clean and renewable energy standards for electricity. Resource and Energy Economics 2014:36(2):556–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.09.001Search in Google Scholar
Shen C., Li S., Wang X., Liao Z. The effect of environmental policy tools on regional green innovation: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020:254:120122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120122Search in Google Scholar
Joshi J. Do renewable portfolio standards increase renewable energy capacity? Evidence from the United States. Journal of Environmental Management 2021:287:112261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112261Search in Google Scholar
Zhao X., Mahendru M., Ma X., Rao A., Shang Y. Impacts of environmental regulations on green economic growth in China: New guidelines regarding renewable energy and energy efficiency. Renewable Energy 2022:187:728–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.076Search in Google Scholar
Popp D. Innovation and climate policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics 2010:2(1):275–98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.resource.012809.103929Search in Google Scholar
Pitelis A., Vasilakos N., Chalvatzis K. Fostering innovation in renewable energy technologies: Choice of policy instruments and effectiveness. Renewable Energy 2020:151:1163–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.100Search in Google Scholar
Ghorbal S., Farhani S., Youssef S. B. Do renewable energy and national patents impact the environmental sustainability of Tunisia? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022:29:5248–25262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17628-7Search in Google Scholar
Tang M., Cheng S., Guo W. et al. Relationship between carbon emission trading schemes and companies’ total factor productivity: evidence from listed companies in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2023:25:11735–11767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02552-8Search in Google Scholar
Greenhalgh C., Rogers M. Innovation, intellectual property, and economic growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400832231Search in Google Scholar
Grin J., Rotmans J., Schot J. Transitions to sustainable development: new directions in the study of long-term transformative change. New York: Routledge, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856598Search in Google Scholar
Kivimaa P., Kern F. Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy 2016:45(1):205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008Search in Google Scholar
Newell R. G., Pizer W. A. Discounting the distant future: How much do uncertain rates increase valuations? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2003:46(1):52–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00031-1Search in Google Scholar
Hoepner A. G., Kant B., Scholtens B., Yu P. S. Environmental and ecological economics in the 21st century: An age adjusted citation analysis of the influential articles, journals, authors and institutions. Ecological Economics 2012:77:193–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.002Search in Google Scholar
Acemoglu D., Linn J. Market size in innovation: theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2004:119(3):1049–1090. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041502144Search in Google Scholar
Jaffe A. B., Palmer K. Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1997:79(4):610–619. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465397557196Search in Google Scholar
Kivimaa P., Kern F. Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy 2016:45(1):205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008Search in Google Scholar
Popp D. Environmental policy and innovation: A decade of research. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 2019:13(3–4):265-–337. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000111Search in Google Scholar
EPO PATSTAT. The 2022 Autumn Edition [Online]. [Accessed 23.03.2023]. Available: https://www.epo.org/searching-for-patents/business/patstat.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
EPO Patent classification [Online]. [Accessed 23.03.2023]. Available: https://www.epo.org/news-events/in-focus/classification.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
IEA Energy Technology Patents Data Explorer [Online]. [Accessed 23.03.2023]. Available: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/energy-technology-patents-data-explorerSearch in Google Scholar
Haščič I., Silva J., Johnstone N. The use of patent statistics for international comparisons and analysis of narrow technological fields, OECD Science Technology and Industry Working Papers 2015:05. https://doi.org/10.1787/5js03z98mvr7-enSearch in Google Scholar
Kruse T., Dechezleprêtre A., Saffar R., Robert L. Measuring environmental policy stringency in OECD countries: An update of the OECD composite EPS indicator. OECD Economics Department Working Papers 2022:1703. https://doi.org/10.1787/90ab82e8-enSearch in Google Scholar
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Climate change 2014 synthesis report. Geneva: IPCC Switzerland, 2014. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Koenker R., Ng P., Portnoy S. Quantile smoothing splines. Biometrika 1994:81(4):673–680. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/81.4.673Search in Google Scholar
Bloomfield P., Steiger W. L. Least absolute deviations: Theory, applications, and algorithms. Boston: Birkhäuser, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8574-5Search in Google Scholar
Nychka D., Gray G., Haaland P., Martin D., O’connell M. A nonparametric regression approach to syringe grading for quality improvement. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995:90(432):1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476623Search in Google Scholar