[
[1] Uddin M. N., et al. Renewable energy in Bangladesh : Status and prospects. Energy Procedia 2019:160:655–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.21810.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.218
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] Islam S. A review on recent growth of electrical power generation and power demand in Bangladesh and some suggestions for combating the upcoming challenges. Energy Procedia 2019:160:60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.11910.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.119
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3] Rahman A. BD to import 1,000MW hydro-power from Myanmar, China. Dhaka Tribune, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4] Crago C. L., Chernyakhovskiy I. Residential solar photovoltaic technology adoption: An empirical investigation of state policy effectiveness. Presented on the 2014 at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association’s Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, USA, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5] Hoen B., et al. An analysis of the effects of residential photovoltaic energy systems on home sales prices in California. Denver: EETD, 2011.10.2172/1013074
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6] Graziano M., Gillingham K. Spatial patterns of solar photovoltaic system adoption: the influence of neighbors and the built environment. J. Econ. Geogr. 2015:15(4):815–839. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu03610.1093/jeg/lbu036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7] Lobel R., Perakis G. Consumer choice model for forecasting demand and designing incentives for solar technology. Sloan: MITSloan, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.174842410.2139/ssrn.1748424
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8] Hughes J. E., Podolefsky M. Getting green with solar subsidies: evidence from the California solar initiative. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2015:2(2):235–275. https://doi.org/10.1086/68113110.1086/681131
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9] Sulaiman J., Azman A., Saboori B. Development of solar energy in Sabah Malaysia: The case of Trudgill’s Perception. Int. J. Sustain. Energy Environ. Res. 2014:3:90–99.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10] W. Mann. Solar Renewable Energy Certificate Markets: Assessing the Volatility Impact. Springer, 2014(73).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11] Hirth L. Market value of solar power: Is photovoltaics cost-competitive? IET Renew. Power Gener. 2014:9:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2014.010110.1049/iet-rpg.2014.0101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12] Huo M., Zhang X., He J. Causality relationship between the photovoltaic market and its manufacturing in China, Germany, the US, and Japan. Front. Energy. 2011:5:43–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-010-0135-510.1007/s11708-010-0135-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13] Palage K., Lundmark R., Söderholm P. Public policies and solar PV innovation: an empirical study based on patent data. Presented at the 37th IAEE Int. Conf. on Energy Econ. New York, USA, 2014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14] Adachi C., Rowlands I. H. The role of policies in supporting the diffusion of solar photovoltaic systems: Experiences with Ontario, Canada’s Renewable Energy Standard Offer Program. Sustainability 2010:2:30–47. https://doi.org/10.3390/su201003010.3390/su2010030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15] Resch R., Solar Energy Industries Association. US Solar Industry Continues Rapid Growth. Washington: SEIA, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16] Vorrath S. One-quarter of Australian homes now have solar. Renew Economy, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17] International Trade Administration. United Arab Emirates - Renewable Energy. Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[18] Masukujjaman M., et al. Purchase Intention of Renewable Energy Technology in Rural Areas in Bangladesh: Empirical Evidence. Renew. Energy 2021:170:639–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.12510.1016/j.renene.2021.01.125
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19] Kabir E., et al. Solar energy: Potential and future prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018:82:894–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.09410.1016/j.rser.2017.09.094
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[20] Spanos Y. E., Prastacos G. P., Poulymenakou A. The relationship between information and communication technologies adoption and management. Information & Management 2002:39:659–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00141-010.1016/S0378-7206(01)00141-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[21] Dewan S., Kraemer K. L. Information technology and productivity: evidence from country-level data. Manag. Sci. 2000:46:548–562.10.1287/mnsc.46.4.548.12057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[22] Davies S., Davies G. The diffusion of process innovations. Campbridge University Press, 1979.10.1016/0014-2921(79)90023-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[23] Dunlap R. E., Scarce R. Poll trends: Environmental problems and protection. Public Opin. Q. 1991:55:651–672.10.1086/269288
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[24] Leonidou C. N., Leonidou L. C. Research into environmental marketing/management: a bibliographic analysis. Eur. J. Mark. 2011:45(1/2):68–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/0309056111109560310.1108/03090561111095603
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[25] Plouffe C. R., Hulland J. S., Vandenbosch M. Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions— understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Inf. Syst. Res. 2001:12(2):208–222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.2.208.969710.1287/isre.12.2.208.9697
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[26] Agarwal R., Prasad J. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decis. Sci. 1997:28(3):557–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[27] Moore G.C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 1991:2(3):192–222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.19210.1287/isre.2.3.192
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[28] Fishbein M., et al. Predicting and understanding family planning behaviors. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1980.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[29] Davis F. D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q. 1989:13(3):319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/24900810.2307/249008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[30] Davis R., et al. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Manage. Sci.1989:35(8):982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.98210.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[31] Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991:50:179–21110.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[32] Falko F. S., Presseau J., Araújo-Soares V. Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Heal. Psych. Rev. 2014:8(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2013.86971010.1080/17437199.2013.86971025053004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[33] Hai L. C., Alam Kazmi S. H. Dynamic support of government in online shopping. A. Soc. Sci, 2015:11(22):1–9. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n22p110.5539/ass.v11n22p1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[34] Karatu V. M. H., Mat N. K. N. The mediating effects of green trust and perceived behavioral control on the direct determinants of intention to purchase green products in Nigeria. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 2015:6(4):256. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4p25610.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4p256
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[35] Jaiswal D., Kant R. Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018:41:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.00810.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[36] Anderson K. Australia leads the way in small scale solar installs. Solar Guide [Online]. [Accessed 02.04.2022] Available: https://www.solarguide.co.uk/australia-leads-the-way-in-small-scale-solar-installs#/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[37] Sang Y.-N., Bekhet H. A. Exploring factors influencing electric vehicle usage intention: an empirical study in Malaysia. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 2015:16(1):57–74. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.554.201510.33736/ijbs.554.2015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[38] Alam S. S. Adoption of internet in Malaysian SMEs. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2009:16(2):240–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/1462600091095603810.1108/14626000910956038
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[39] Borenstein S. Electricity Rate Structures and the Economics of Solar PV: Could Mandatory Time-of-Use Rates Undermine California’s Solar Photovoltaic Subsidies? Berkeley: CSEM, UCEI, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[40] Yadav R., Pathak G. S. Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2016:135:732–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.12010.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[41] Mostafa M. M. Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behaviour: the effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2007:31(3):220–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00523.x10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00523.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[42] Setyawan A., et al. Green product buying intentions among young consumers: Extending the application of theory of planned behavior. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2018:16(2):145–154. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.1310.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[43] Fransson N., Gärling T. Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. J. Environ. Psychol. 1999:19(4):369–382. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.014110.1006/jevp.1999.0141
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[44] Howard J., Moore W. Changes in consumer behavior over the product life cycle. Readings in the management of innovation. Boston: Pitman. 1982.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[45] Sathye M. Adoption of Internet banking by Australian consumers: an empirical investigation. Int. J. Bank Mark. 1999:17(7):324–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/0265232991030568910.1108/02652329910305689
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[46] Fishbein R. E., Sanghvi A. P., Unit A. E. Survey of productive uses of electricity in rural areas. Washington, 2003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[47] Zografakis N., et al. Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010:14:1088–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.00910.1016/j.rser.2009.11.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[48] Wüstenhagen R., Wolsink M., Bürer M. J. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 2007:35(5):2683–2691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.00110.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[49] Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 1990:35(1):128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/239355310.2307/2393553
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[50] Pagiaslis A., Krontalis A. K. Green consumption behavior antecedents: Environmental concern, knowledge, and beliefs. Psychol. Mark. 2014:31(5):335–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.2069810.1002/mar.20698
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[51] Mark N., Law M. Encouraging green purchase behaviours of Hong Kong consumers. Asian J. Bus. Res. 2015:5(2). https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.15001310.14707/ajbr.150013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[52] Basha M. B., et al. Consumers attitude towards organic food. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2015:31:444–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01219-810.1016/S2212-5671(15)01219-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[53] Suki N. M. Investigating the measurement of Consumer ecological behaviour, environmental knowledge, healthy food, and healthy way of life. Int. J. Soc. Ecol. Sustain. Dev. 2014:5(1):12–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsesd.201401010210.4018/ijsesd.2014010102
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[54] Peter R., Dickie L., Peter V. M. Adoption of photovoltaic power supply systems: A study of key determinants in India. Renew. Energy 2006:31(14):2272–2283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2005.11.00110.1016/j.renene.2005.11.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[55] Alam S. S., et al. A survey on renewable energy development in Malaysia: Current status, problems and prospects. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2016:17:5–17. https://doi.org/10.1515/rtuect-2016-000210.1515/rtuect-2016-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[56] Sarker S. R., Roy P. P., Zuberi M. I. Home Garden: A Genetic Resource of Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam) in Semi Arid Region of Bangladesh. Gene Conserv. 2015:14(57):1–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[57] Hair J. F., et al. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th edition. New York: Pearson, 1998.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[58] Chen K., Deng T. Research on the green purchase intentions from the perspective of Product knowledge. Sustain. 2016:8(9):943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su809094310.3390/su8090943
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[59] Yang M., Al-Shaaban S., Nguyen T. B. Consumer attitude and purchase intention towards organic food: A quantitative study of China. 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[60] Alam S. S., et al. Factors affecting e-commerce adoption in the electronic manufacturing companies in Malaysia. Int. J. Commer. Manag. 2007:17(1/2):125–139. https://doi.og/10.1108/1056921071077650310.1108/10569210710776503
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[61] Alam S. S., et al. An empirical study of factors affecting electronic commerce adoption among SMEs in Malaysia. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2011:12(2):375–399. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2011.57674910.3846/16111699.2011.576749
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[62] Ahmad A., et al. Perceptions on Renewable Energy Use in Malaysia : Mediating Role of Attitude. J. Pengur. 2014:41:123–131. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2014-41-1110.17576/pengurusan-2014-41-11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[63] Moghavvemi S., et al. An empirical study of IT innovation adoption among small and medium sized enterprises in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Soc. Technol. Technol. 2011:1:267–282.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[64] Lo S. M., Power D. An empirical investigation of the relationship between product nature and supply chain strategy. Supply Chain Manag. 2010:15(2):139–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/1359854101102874110.1108/13598541011028741
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[65] Ryans A. B. Estimating Consumer Preferences for a New Durable Brand in an Established Product Class. J. Mark. Res. 1974:11(4):434–443. https://doi.org/10.2307/315129010.2307/3151290
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[66] Podsakoff P. M., et al. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003:88(5):879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.87910.1037/0021-9010.88.5.87914516251
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[67] Alexander N., Colgate M. Retail financial services: transaction to relationship marketing. Eur. J. Mark. 2000:34(8):938–953. https://doi.org/10.1108/0309056001033143210.1108/03090560010331432
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[68] Malhotra N. K. Marketing research, An applied orientation, 3rd Edition. New York: Pearson, 1999.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[69] Hair J. F., et al. A premier on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Newbuty Park: Sage Publications, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[70] Bryman A., Cramer D. Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for Windows: A guide for social scientists. Oxford: Routledge, 2002.10.4324/9780203471548
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[71] Kline R. B. Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. The SAGE Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods. Newbury Park: SAGE, 2011. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446268261.n3110.4135/9781446268261.n31
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[72] Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988:16:74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0272332710.1007/BF02723327
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[73] Holbert R. L., Stephenson M. T. Structural Equation Modeling in the Communication Sciences, 1995–2000. Hum. Commun. Res. 2002:28:1995–2000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00822.x10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00822.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[74] Bentler P. M., Bonett D. G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 1980:88:588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.58810.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[75] Jöreskog K. G., Sörbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. US: Scientific Software International, 1993.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[76] Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. J. Mark. Res. 1981:18(3):382–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/315098010.2307/3150980
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[77] McDonald R. P., Ho M.-H. R. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol. Methods. 2002:7(1):64–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.6410.1037/1082-989X.7.1.6411928891
]Search in Google Scholar