[[1] Kouravand S., Kermani A. M. Clean power production by simultaneous reduction of NOx and SOx contaminants using Mazut Nano-Emulsion and wet flue-gas desulfurization. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018:201:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.01710.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.017]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 736. Procedures for the Prevention, Limit and Control of the Issue of Air Pollutants From Burning Plants. Latvijas Vestnesis, 249, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Central statistical bureau database. Energy balance. [Online]. [Accessed: 02.11.2019]. Available: https://data.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/vide/vide__energetika__ikgad/ENG020.px/table/tableViewLayout1/]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Khan M. F., Shirasuna Y., Hirano K., Masunaga S. Characterization of PM2.5, PM2.5–10 and PM>10 in ambient air, Yokohama, Japan. Atmospheric Research 2010:96(1):159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.12.00910.1016/j.atmosres.2009.12.009]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Dal Pozzo A., Antonioni G., Guglielmi D., Stramigioli C., Cozzani V. Comparison of alternative flue-gas dry treatment technologies in waste-to-energy processes. Waste Management 2016:51:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.02910.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.02926951719]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] Bianchini A., Pellegrini M., Rossi J., Saccani C. Theoretical model and preliminary design of an innovative wet scrubber for the separation of fine particulate matter produced by biomass combustion in small size boilers. Biomass and Bioenergy 2018:116:60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.05.01110.1016/j.biombioe.2018.05.011]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] Bianchini A., Cento F., Golfera L., Pellegrini M., Saccani C. Performance analysis of different scrubber systems for removal of particulate emissions from a small size biomass boiler. Biomass and Bioenergy 2016:92:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.06.00510.1016/j.biombioe.2016.06.005]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Priedniece V., Kirsanovs V., Dzikēvičs M., Vīgants Ģ., Veidenbergs I., Blumberga D. Experimental and analytical study of the flue-gas condenser – fog unit. Energy Procedia 2019:158:822–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.21510.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.215]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Khorrami Z., Banihashemi M. A. Numerical simulation of sedimentation process in reservoirs and development of a non-coupled algorithm to improve long-term modeling. International Journal of Sediment Research 2019:34(3):279–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2018.10.00310.1016/j.ijsrc.2018.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] Luna F. D. T. et al. Fluid dynamics in continuous settler. Chemical Engineering Journal 2019:362:712–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.08810.1016/j.cej.2019.01.088]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Ochowiak M., Matuszak M., Włodarczak S., Ancukiewicz M., Krupińska A. The modified swirl sedimentation tanks for water purification. Journal of Environmental Management 2017:189:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.02310.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.02328002778]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] Ravva S. R., Iyer K. N., Gaikwad A. J. Development of sump model for containment hydrogen distribution calculations using CFD code. Nuclear Engineering and Design 2015:295:429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.10.00910.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.10.009]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Tikhonov A., Yarnykh T. Technology of Medicines. Golden Pages, NUPU. 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Kang X., Zhao X., Bate B. Sedimentation Behavior of Kaolinite: Salt and Fly Ash Effects. Int. Conferences on Case Histories on Soil Property improvement. Chicago, Illinois. 2013.]Search in Google Scholar