CFD Modelling of Biomass Mixing in Anaerobic Digesters of Biogas Plants

[1] Lebranchu A., et al. Impact of shear stress and impeller design on the production of biogas in anaerobic digesters. Bioresource Technology 2017:245(A):1139–1147. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.11310.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.11328863993Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[2] Naegele H. J., et al. Electric energy consumption of the full scale research biogas plant ‘unterer lindenhof’: results of longterm and full detail measurements. Energies 2012:5(12):5198–5214. doi:10.3390/en512519810.3390/en5125198Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Sonnleitner M. Ecological and economic optimization of biogas plants. MPhil Thesis. Leicester: De Montfort University, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Singh B., Szamosi Z., Simenfalvi Z. State of the art on mixing in an anaerobic digester: a review. Renewable Energy 2019:141:922–936. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.07210.1016/j.renene.2019.04.072Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Kowalczyk A., et al. Different mixing modes for biogas plants using energy crops. Applied Energy 2013:112:465–472. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.06510.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.065Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Wiedemann L., et al. Mixing in Biogas Digesters and Development of an Artificial Substrate for Laboratory-Scale Mixing Optimization. Chemical Engineering & Technology 2017:40:238–247. doi:10.1002/ceat.20160019410.1002/ceat.201600194Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] Conti F., et al. Mixing of a Model Substrate in a Scale-down Laboratory Digester and Processing with a Computational Fluid Dynamics Model. Proc. of 26th EUBCE-European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Copenhagen 2018:811–815. doi:10.5071/26thEUBCE2018-2CV.5.3410.5071/26thEUBCE2018-2CV.5.34Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Leonzio G. Study of mixing systems and geometric configurations for anaerobic digesters using CFD analysis. Renewable Energy 2018:123:578–589. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.07110.1016/j.renene.2018.02.071Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bridgeman J. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of sewage sludge moxing in an anaerobic digester. Advances in Engineering Software 2012:44(1):54–62. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.03710.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.037Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10] Dapelo D., Alberini F., Bridgeman J. Euler-Lagrange CFD modelling of unconfined gas mixing in anaerobic digestion. Water Res. 2015:85:497–511. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.04210.1016/j.watres.2015.08.04226379205Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ding J., et al. CFD optimization of continuous stirred-tank (CSTR) reactor for biohydrogen production. Bioresource Technology 2010:101:7005–7013. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.14610.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.14620427177Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[12] Keshtkar A., et al. Mathematical modeling of nonideal mixing continuous flow reactors for anaerobic digestion of cattle manure. Bioresource Technology 2003:87(1):113–124. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00104-910.1016/S0960-8524(02)00104-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Vesvikar M. S., Al-Dahhan M. Flow pattern visualization in a mimic anaerobic digester using CFD. Biotechnology in Bioengineering 2005:89(6):719–732. doi:10.1002/bit.2038810.1002/bit.2038815685599Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] Lopez-Jimenez P. A., et al. Application of CFD methods to an anaerobic digester: the case of Ontinyent WWPT, Valencia, Spain. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2015:7:131–140. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.05.00610.1016/j.jwpe.2015.05.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[15] Wiedemann L., et al. Modeling Mixing in Anaerobic Digesters with Computational Fluid Dynamics Validated by Experiments. Chemical Engineering & Technology 2018:41:2101–2110. doi:10.1002/ceat.20180008310.1002/ceat.201800083Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] Conti F., et al. Thermal behaviour of viscosity of aqueous cellulose solutions to emulate biomass in anaerobic digesters. New Journal of Chemistry 2018:42:1099–1104. doi:10.1039/c7nj03199h10.1039/C7NJ03199HSearch in Google Scholar

[17] Wiedemann L., et al. Investigation and optimization of the mixing in a biogas digester with a laboratory experiment and an artificial model substrate. Proceeding of 25th EUBCE-European Biomass Conference and Exibition, Stockholm 2017:889–892. doi:10.5071/25thEUBCE2017-2CV.4.1410.5071/25thEUBCE2017-2CV.4.14Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] Sindall R. C., Bridgeman J., Carliell-marquet C. Velocity gradient as a tool to characterrize the link between mixing and biogas production in anaerobic waste digesters. Water Sci. Technol. 2013:67:2800–2806.10.2166/wst.2013.20623787320Search in Google Scholar

[19] Conti F., et al. Monitoring the mixing of an artificial model substrate in a scale-down laboratory digester. Renewable Energy 2019:132:351–362. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.01310.1016/j.renene.2018.08.013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[20] Shen F., et al. Improving the mixing performances of rice straw anaerobic digestion for higher biogas production by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. Applied Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013:171626–642.10.1007/s12010-013-0375-z23873639Search in Google Scholar

[21] Gerogiorgis D. I., Ydstie B. E. Multiphysics CFD modeling for design and simulation of a multiphase chemical reactor. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2005:83(6):603–610. doi:10.1205/cherd.0436410.1205/cherd.04364Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22] Atta A., Roy S., Nigam K. D. P. A two-phase Eulerian approach using relative permeability concept for modeling of hydrodynamics in trickle-bed reactors at elevated pressure. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2010:88(3):369–378. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2009.06.01110.1016/j.cherd.2009.06.011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] Celik I. B., et al. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. Journal of Fluid Engineering 2008:130(7):0780011–0780014. doi:10.1115/1.296095310.1115/1.2960953Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[24] Conti F., et al. Effect of mixing of waste biomass in anaerobic digesters for production of biogas. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Sci. Eng. 2018:446:012011. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/446/1/01201110.1088/1757-899X/446/1/012011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[25] Wu B. CFD investigation of turbulence models for mechanical agitation of non-Newtonian fluids in anaerobic digesters. Water Research 2011:45(5):2082–2094. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.12.02010.1016/j.watres.2010.12.020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[26] Alexopoulos A. H., Maggioris D., Kiparissides C. CFD analysis of turbulence non-homogeneity in mixing vessels: a two compartment model. Chemical Engineering Science 2002:57(10):1735–1752. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00053-210.1016/S0009-2509(02)00053-2Search in Google Scholar

[27] Trentini M., Lorenzon M., Conti F. Biotechnology to investigate the microbial community responsible of biogas production from biomass. Proceeding of 26^th EUBCE-European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Copenhagen, 2018:816–820. doi:10.5071/26thEUBCE2018-2CV.5.3510.5071/26thEUBCE2018-2CV.5.35Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[28] Castellan N., Conti F. Molecular biotechnology to improve biofuel production from biomass. Proceeding of 27^th EUBCE-European Biomass Conf. and Exhibition, Lisbon, 2019:951–957. doi:10.5071/27thEUBCE2019-2CV.6.2410.5071/27thEUBCE2019-2CV.6.24Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[29] Djossou A., Conti F. Mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria in anaerobic digestion process. Proceeding of 27^th EUBCE-European Biomass Conf. and Exhibition, Lisbon, 2019:942–945. doi:10.5071/27thEUBCE2019-2CV.6.910.5071/27thEUBCE2019-2CV.6.9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar