Stakeholders in the EIA Process: What is Important for them? The Case of Road Construction

[1] Morgan R. K. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 2012:30:5-14. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.661557Search in Google Scholar

[2] Polonen I., Hokkanen P., Jalava K. The effectiveness of the Finnish EIA system - What works, what doesn't, and what could be improved? Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2011:31:120-128. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2010.06.003Search in Google Scholar

[3] Zhang J., Kornov L., Christensen P. Critical factors for EIA implementation: Literature review and research options. Journal of Environmental Management 2013:114:148-157. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.030Search in Google Scholar

[4] Glucker A. N., Driessen P. P. J., Kolhoff A., Runhaar H. A. C. Public participation in environmental impact assessment: why, who and how? Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2013:43:104-111. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.06.003Search in Google Scholar

[5] Soria-Lara J. A., Bertolini L., te Brommelstroet M. Environmental impact assessment in urban transport planning: Exploring process-related barriers in Spanish practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2015:50:95-104. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.001Search in Google Scholar

[6] Chanchitpricha C., Bond A. Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2013:43:65-72. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.006Search in Google Scholar

[7] Antonson H. Public participation and written submissions: A transport infrastructure planning case study. Transportation Research 2014:70:59-66. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.015Search in Google Scholar

[8] O’Faircheallaigh C. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2010:30:19-27. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001Search in Google Scholar

[9] Soria-Lara J. A., Bertolini L., te Brommelstroet M. An experiential approach to improving the integration of knowledge during EIA in transport planning. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2016:56:188-199. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2015.10.007Search in Google Scholar

[10] Reed M. S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 2008:141:2417 -2431. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014Search in Google Scholar

[11] UN. Convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context. Espoo; 1991.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kruopiene J., Zidoniene S., Dvarioniene J. Current practice and shortcomings of EIA in Lithuania. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2009:29:305-309. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.02.003Search in Google Scholar

[13] Woloszyn W. Evolution of environmental impact assessment in Poland: problems and prospects. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 2004:22(2):109-119. doi:10.3152/147154604781765950Search in Google Scholar

[14] Directive 2014/52/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 amending Directive 2011/92/EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of European Union 2014:124:1-18.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Savan B., Gore C. Translating strong principles into effective practice: environmental assessment in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2014:58(3):404-422. doi:10.1080/09640568.2013.859572Search in Google Scholar

[16] Toro J., Requena I., Zamorano M. Environmental impact assessment in Colombia: Critical analysis and proposals for improvement. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2010:30:247-261. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.09.001Search in Google Scholar

[17] Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the application and effectiveness of the EIA Directive (Directive 85/337/EEC, as amended by Directives 97/11/EC and 2003/35/EC). European Commission; 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Cuppen M., Broekhans B., Enserink B. Public participation in EIA and attitude formation. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 2012:30(2):63-74. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.660348Search in Google Scholar

[19] Luyet V., Schlaepfer R., Parlange M., Buttler A. A framework to implement Stakeholder participation in environmental projects. Journal of Environmental Management 2012:111:213-219. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.026Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kruopiene J., Zidoniene S., Dvarioniene J., Mikalauskas A. Evaluation of environmental impact assessment effectiveness in Lithuania. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management 2008:2(44):28-33.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Infraplanas. The EIA report of Vilnius Siaurine Street. Kaunas; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Law on Environmental Impact Assessment of the Proposed Economic Activity. The Minister of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania; 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Zhang Y., Liu X., Yu Y., Bian G., Li Y., Long Y. Challenge of Public Participation in China’s EIA Practice. 32nd Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Portugal, 27 May-1 June 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Kittipongvises S. Assessment of Environmental Impacts of Limestone Quarrying Operations in Thailand. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2017:20:67-83. doi:10.1515/rtuect-2017-0011Search in Google Scholar

[25] Lera-Lopez F., Sanchez M., Faulin J., Cacciolatti L. Rural environment stakeholders and policy making: Willingness to pay to reduce road transportation pollution impact in the Western Pyrenees. Transportation Research 2014:32:129-142. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2014.07.003Search in Google Scholar

[26] Chi C. S. F., Xu J., Xue L. Public participation in environmental impact assessment for public projects: a case of non-participation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2014:57(9):1422-1440. doi:10.1080/09640568.2013.810550Search in Google Scholar

[27] Hourdequin M., Landres P., Hanson M. J., Craig D. R. Ethical implications of democratic theory for U.S. public participation in environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2012:35:37-44. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.02.001Search in Google Scholar