[
1. Rohr UP, Binder C, Dieterle T, Giusti F, Messina CG, Toerien E, et al. The value of in vitro diagnostic testing in medical practice: a status report. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0149856 DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0149856
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2.Jensen AL, Kjelgaard-Hansen M. Method comparison in the clinical laboratory. Vet Clin Pathol. 2006 Sep;35(3):276-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2006. tb00131.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved guideline - Third Edition. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2013. CLSI Document EP09-A3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Statland BE. Clinical Decision Levels for Laboratory Tests, Second Edition. Oradell NJ, Medical Economics Books, 1987.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA programs: laboratory requirements relating to quality systems and certain personnel qualifications. Final Rule. Fed Regist 2003;16:3650-714.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia-Lario JV, Hernandez A, Jimenez CV, et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59:491-500 DOI: 10.1080/0036551995018522910.1080/0036551995018522910667686
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. White GH, Farrance I; AACB Uncertainty of Measurement Working Group. Uncertainty of measurement in quantitative medical testing: a laboratory implementation guide. Clin Biochem Rev. 2004;25(4):S1-S24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Smolcic VS, Bilic-Zulle L. Normalized MEDx chart as a useful tool for evaluation of analytical quality achievements. A picture is worth a thousand words. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(5):e99-e101. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2012-062910.1515/cclm-2012-062923241594
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Sikaris K. Analytical quality - what should we be aiming for?. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008;29(Suppl 1):S5-S10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Westgard S, Bayat H, Westgard JO. Analytical Sigma metrics: A review of Six Sigma implementation tools for medical laboratories. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018;28(2):020502. DOI: 10.11613/BM.2018.02050210.11613/BM.2018.020502603916130022879
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Ceriotti F, Fernandez-Calle P, Klee GG, Nordin G, Sandberg S, Streichert T, et al. Criteria for assigning laboratory measurands to models for analytical performance specifications defined in the 1st EFLM Strategic Conference. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Feb;55(2):189-194. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2016-009110.1515/cclm-2016-009127506603
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Friedecky B, Kratochvila J, Budina M. Why do different EQA schemes have apparently different limits of acceptability? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Apr;49(4):743-5. DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.10510.1515/CCLM.2011.10521235390
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Hens K, Berth M, Armbruster D, Westgard S. Sigma metrics used to assess analytical quality of clinical chemistry assays: importance of the allowable total error (TEa) target. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014 Jul;52(7):973-80. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2013-109010.1515/cclm-2013-109024615486
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Fasano T, Bedini JL, Fle PA, Jlaiel M, Hubbert K, Datta H, et al. Multi-site performance evaluation and Sigma metrics of 20 assays on the Atellica chemistry and immunoassay analyzers. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Dec;58(1):59-68. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2019-069910.1515/cclm-2019-069931639101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Skendzel LP, Barnett RN, Platt R. Medically useful criteria for analytic performance of laboratory tests. Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Feb;83(2):200-5. DOI: 10.1093/ ajcp/83.2.20010.1093/ajcp/83.2.2003969959
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Sandberg S, Fraser CG, Horvath AR, Jansen R, Jones G, Oosterhuis W, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 May;53(6):833-5. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2015-006710.1515/cclm-2015-006725719329
]Search in Google Scholar
