Bicycle Level of Service Model for the Cycloruta, Bogota, Colombia

[1] BANISTER D. Sustainable urban development and transport-a Eurovision for 2020. Transport Reviews, 20(1), 113-130, (2000).10.1080/014416400295365Search in Google Scholar

[2] BBC News Magazine, 2013 (8 August)Search in Google Scholar

[3] BHAT, C. An analysis of evening commute stop-making behavior using repeated choice observations from a multi-day survey. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,33(7),495-510.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00003-X, (1999).10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00003-X,(1999)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] BOHLE, W. Attractiveness of bicycle-facilities for the users and evaluation of measures for the cycle-traffic. Paper presented at the Traffic Safety on Two Continents Conference (pp. 89-94), (2000).Search in Google Scholar

[5] CERVERO, R. Progressive Transport and the Poor: Bogota’s Bold Steps Forward.(2005).Search in Google Scholar

[6] DAVIS, W. J. Bicycle safety evaluation. Auburn University. (1987).Search in Google Scholar

[7] DIXON, L. B. Bicycle and pedestrian level-of-service performance measures and standards for congestion management systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1538(1), 1-9. (1996).10.1177/0361198196153800101Search in Google Scholar

[8] EDDY, N. Developing a level of service for bicycle use. Paper presented at the Pro Bike Pro Walk 96: Forecasting the future, Portland, Me. (1996).Search in Google Scholar

[9] EPPERSON, B. Evaluating suitability of roadways for bicycle use: Toward a cycling level-of-service standard. In Transportation Research Record 1438, TRB, National Research Council Board, Washington, DC. (1994).Search in Google Scholar

[10] FRIDSTRØM, L., IFVER, J., INGEBRIGTSEN, S., KULMALA, R., & THOMSEN, L. K. Measuring the contribution of randomness, exposure, weather, and daylight to the variation in road accident counts. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 27(1), 1-20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(94)E0023-E. 1995.10.1016/0001-4575(94)E0023-ESearch in Google Scholar

[11] GARRARD, J., ROSE, G., & LO, S. K. Promoting transportation cycling for women: The role of bicycle infrastructure. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 55-59. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.010(2008).10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.010(2008)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[12] GREENE, W. H., &HENSHER, D. A. Modelling ordered choices: New York (2009).10.1017/CBO9780511845062Search in Google Scholar

[13] HANKEY, S., LINDSEY, G., WANG, X., BORAH, J., HOFF, K., UTECHT, B., &XU, Z. Estimating use of non-motorized infrastructure: Models of bicycle and pedestrian traffic in Minneapolis, MN. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(3), 307-316. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.005. (2012).10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.005.(2012)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] HARKEY, D. L., REINFURT, D. W., &KNUIMAN, M. Development of the bicycle compatibility index. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1636(1), 13-20. (1998).10.3141/1636-03Search in Google Scholar

[15] HICKMAN, R., SAXENA, S., BANISTER, D., &ASHIRU, O. Examining transport futures with scenario analysis and MCA. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(3), 560-575. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.006(2012).10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.006(2012)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] HULL, A. Transport matters: integrated approaches to planning city-regions: Routledge Ltd. (2010).Search in Google Scholar

[17] HCM Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C.. (2000).Search in Google Scholar

[18] IDU. Ciclorutas. Instituto de Desarrollo Urbano (IDU), City of Bogota, Colombia. Available at: http://www.idu.gov.co/web/guest/espacio_Ciclorutas. (2009).Search in Google Scholar

[19] JENSEN, S. U. Pedestrian and Bicyclist Level of Service on Roadway Segments. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2031(1), 43-51. (2007).10.3141/2031-06Search in Google Scholar

[20] KANG, K., & LEE, K. Development of a bicycle level of service model from the user‘s perspective. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(6), 1032-1039. (2012).10.1007/s12205-012-1146-zSearch in Google Scholar

[21] KENWORTHY, J. R. Chapter 9 - Energy Use and CO2 Production in the Urban Passenger Transport Systems of 84 International Cities: Findings and Policy Implications. In D. Peter (Ed.), Urban Energy Transition (pp. 211-236). Amsterdam: Elsevier. (2008).10.1016/B978-0-08-045341-5.00009-8Search in Google Scholar

[22] KMOCT Korean highway capacity manual, Korean Ministry of Construction and Transportation.Gwacheoun (2001).Search in Google Scholar

[23] LANDIS, B. W., VATTIKUTI, V. R., OTTENBERG, R. M., MCLEOD, D. S., &GUTTENPLAN, M. Modeling the roadside walking environment: pedestrian level of service. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1773(1), 82-88. (2001).10.3141/1773-10Search in Google Scholar

[24] LANDIS, B. W., VATTIKUTI, V. R., &BRANNICK, M. T. Real-time human perceptions: toward a bicycle level of service. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1578(1), 119-126 (1997).10.3141/1578-15Search in Google Scholar

[25] LANDIS, B. W. Bicycle interaction hazard score: a theoretical model. Transportation Research Record 1438, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 3-8. (1994).Search in Google Scholar

[26] LANDIS, B. W. Bicycle System Performance Measures: The Interaction Hazard and Latent Demand Score Models. ITE Journal, 66(2). (1996).Search in Google Scholar

[27] LANDIS, B. W., VATTIKUTI, V. R., OTTENBERG, R. M., PETRITSCH, T. A., GUTTENPLAN, M., & CRIDER, L. B. Intersection level of service for the bicycle through movement. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828(1), 101-106. (2003).10.3141/1828-12Search in Google Scholar

[28] MCPB. Fiscal year 94 Annual Growth Policy. Motgomery County Planning Board and Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission, Dec, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[29] MOHAN, D., &TIWARI, G. Sustainable transport systems: Linkages between environmental issues, public transport, non-motorised transport and safety. Economic and Political Weekly, 1589-1596. (1999).Search in Google Scholar

[30] NELDER, J. A., &WEDDERBURN, R. W. M. (1972). Generalized Linear Models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 135(3), 370-384. doi: 10.2307/234461410.2307/2344614Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[31] OKON, I., BRUSSEL, M. J. G., VAN DEN BOSCH, F. H. M., MORENO, C. A., and van Maarseveen, M. F. A. M. A statistical approach to the estimation of bicycle level of service models for the Cicloruta in Bogota, Colombia. Urban Transport XXIII, Vol 176, 265-282. doi:10.2495/UT170231 (2018)10.2495/UT170231(2018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[32] PROVIDELO, J. K., & DA PENHASANCHES, S. Roadway and traffic characteristics for bicycling. Transportation, 38(5), 765-777. (2011).10.1007/s11116-011-9353-xSearch in Google Scholar

[33] QI, Y., SMITH, B. L., &GUO, J. Freeway accident likelihood prediction using a panel data analysis approach. Journal of transportation engineering, 133(3), 149-156. (2007).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:3(149)Search in Google Scholar

[34] RCI. Florida Road Index, Development of the Bicycle Compatibility Index: A level of service concept. Retrieved from(1998).Search in Google Scholar

[35] SENER, ELURU, &BHAT, An analysis of bicycle route choice preferences in Texas, US.Transportation, 36(5), 511-539, 200910.1007/s11116-009-9201-4Search in Google Scholar

[36] SISSON, S. B., LEE, S. M., BURNS, E. K., & TUDOR-LOCKE, C. Suitability of Commuting by Bicycle to Arizona Elementary Schools. American Journal of Health Promotion, 20(3), 210-213. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-20.3.210 (2006).10.4278/0890-1171-20.3.210(2006)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[37] SORTON, A., & WALSH, T. Bicycle stress level as a tool to evaluate urban and suburban bicycle compatibility. Transportation Research Record, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D. C., 17-24. (1994).Search in Google Scholar

[38] TITZE, S., STRONEGGER, W. J., JANSCHITZ, S., &OJA, P. Association of built-environment, socialenvironment and personal factors with bicycling as a mode of transportation among Austrian city dwellers. Preventive Medicine, 47(3), 252-259. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.019(2008).10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.019(2008)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[39] WASHINGTON, S. P., KARLAFTIS, M. G., & MANNERING, F. L. Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis: CRC press. (2011).Search in Google Scholar

[40] WHYTE, W. H. City: Rediscovering the center: University of Pennsylvania Press. (1988).Search in Google Scholar

[41] WHO.: Road traffic accidents death rate by country. World Health Organisation (2011).Search in Google Scholar

[42] WEY, W.-M., & CHIU, Y.-H. Assessing the walkability of pedestrian environment under the transitoriented development. Habitat International, 38(0), 106-118. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.05.004(2013).10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.05.004Search in Google Scholar

[43] YAZID, M. R. M., ISMAIL, R., &ATIQ, R. The Use of Non-Motorized For Sustainable Transportation in Malaysia.Procedia Engineering, 20(0), 125-134. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.147. (2011).10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.147Search in Google Scholar