This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Cristache CM, Totu EE. CAD-CAM – O tehnologie a mileniului trei in stomatologie. Ed. Didactica si Pedagogica, Bucuresti; 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Bratu D, Nussbaum R. Bazele clinice si tehnice ale protezarii fixe. Ed. Medicala, Bucuresti; 2006.Search in Google Scholar
Gligor MR, Malita MA, Perieanu VS, Costea RC, Beuran IA, Burlibasa M. Aspecte teoretice si practice in tehnologia protezelor unidentare – Parte I. In: Gligor MR, Malita MA, Perieanu VS, Costea RC, Beuran IA, Burlibasa M. Tendinte moderne in stiintele biomedicale. Ed. Matrix Rom, Bucuresti; 2021, pp. 9-153.Search in Google Scholar
Gligor MR, Malita MA, Perieanu VS, Costea RC, Beuran IA, Burlibasa M. Aspecte teoretice si practice in tehnologia protezelor unidentare – Parte II. In: Gligor MR, Malita MA, Perieanu VS, Costea RC, Beuran IA, Burlibasa M. Tendinte moderne in stiintele biomedicale. Ed. Matrix Rom, Bucuresti; 2021, pp. 154-336.Search in Google Scholar
Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):124. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0.Search in Google Scholar
Stanley M, Paz AG, Miguel I, Coachman C. Fully digital workflow, integrating dental scan, smile design and CAD-CAM: case report. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):134. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-018-0597-0.Search in Google Scholar
Joda T, Bragger U. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(12):1430-5. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12476.Search in Google Scholar
Bessadet M, Drancourt N, El Osta N. Time efficiency and cost analysis between digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2025:133(1):71-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.003.Search in Google Scholar
Pan S, Guo D, Zhou Y, Jung RE, Hammerle CHF, Muhlemann S. Time efficiency and quality of outcomes in a model-free digital workflow using digital impression immediately after implant placement: A double-blind self-controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(7):617-26. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13447.Search in Google Scholar
Tallarico M. Computerization and digital workflow in medicine: focus on digital dentistry. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(9):2172. DOI: 10.3390/ ma13092172.Search in Google Scholar
Pieper CM, Waldemarin RF, Camacho GB. Masking ability of opaque thickness on layered metal-ceramic. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2016;29(2):162-7.Search in Google Scholar
Daou EE. Effect of ceramic layering on the fit of cobalt-chromium alloy 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by additive, soft milling, and casting technologies. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126(1):130.e1-130.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.033.Search in Google Scholar
Watanabe H, Fellows C, An H. Digital technologies for restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2022;66(4):567-90. DOI: 10.1016/j. cden.2022.05.006.Search in Google Scholar
Takaichi A, Fueki K, Murakami N, Ueno T, Inamochi Y, Wada J, et al. A systematic review of digital removable partial dentures. Part II: CAD/ CAM framework, artificial teeth, and denture base. J Prosthodont Res. 2022;66(1):53-67. DOI: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00117.Search in Google Scholar
Silva LH, Lima E, Miranda RBP, Favero SS, Lohbauer U, Cesar PF. Dental ceramics: a review of new materials and processing methods. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31(suppl 1):e58. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017. vol31.0058.Search in Google Scholar
Demirci F, Bahce E, Baran MC. Mechanical analysis of three-unit metal-free fixed dental prostheses produced in different materials with CAD/ CAM technology. Clin Oral Investig.;26(9):5969-78. DOI: 10.1007/ s00784-022-04623-6.Search in Google Scholar
Perfil de Orcid