[1. GÄRTNER FR, BOMHOF-ROORDINK H, SMITH IP, SCHOLL I, STIGGELBOUT AM, PIETERSE AH. The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0191747.10.1371/journal.pone.0191747]Search in Google Scholar
[2. TERWEE CB, PRINSEN CAC, CHIAROTTO A, WESTERMAN MJ, PATRICK DL, ALONSO J, BOUTER LM, DE VET HCW, MOKKINK LB. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1159-1170.10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0]Search in Google Scholar
[3. PRINSEN CAC, MOKKINK LB, BOUTER LM, ALONSO J, PATRICK DL, DE VET HCW, TERWEE CB. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147-1157.10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3]Search in Google Scholar
[4. MOKKINK LB, DE VET HCW, PRINSEN CAC, PATRICK DL, ALONSO J, BOUTER LM, TERWEE CB. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171-1179.10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4]Search in Google Scholar
[5. SIMON D, SCHORR G, WIRTZ M, VODERMAIER A, CASPARI C, NEUNER B, et al. Development and first validation of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q). Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63:319–327.10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.012]Search in Google Scholar
[6. SCHOLL I., KRISTON L., DIRMAIER J., HÄRTER M. Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale – an attempt to establish convergent validity. Health Expectations. 2015;18:137–150.10.1111/hex.12022]Search in Google Scholar
[7. KRISTON L, SCHOLL I, HÖLZEL L, SIMON D, LOH A, HÄRTER M. The 9-item shared decision making questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Education and Counseling, 2010; 80: 94–99.10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034]Search in Google Scholar
[8. ALVAREZ K, WANG Y, ALEGRIA M, AULT-BRUTUS A, RAMANAYAKE N, YEH YH, et al. Psychometrics of shared decision making and communication as patient centered measures for two language groups. Psychol Assess. 2016;28(9):1074–86.10.1037/pas0000344]Search in Google Scholar
[9. DE LAS CUEVAS C, PERESTELO-PEREZ L, RIVERO-SANTANA A, CEBOLLA-MARTI A, SCHOLL I, HARTER M. Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):2143-53.10.1111/hex.12183]Search in Google Scholar
[10. RODENBURG-VANDENBUSSCHE S, PIETERSE AH, KROONENBERG PM, SCHOLL I, VAN DER WEIJDEN T, LUYTEN GP, et al. Dutch translation and psychometric testing of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in primary and secondary care. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132158.10.1371/journal.pone.0132158]Search in Google Scholar
[11. ZISMAN-ILANI Y, ROE D, SCHOLL I, HARTER M, KARNIELI-MILLER O. Shared decision making during active psychiatric hospitalization: Assessment and Psychometric Properties. Health Commun. 2016:1–5.10.1080/10410236.2015.1099504]Search in Google Scholar
[12. BAICUS C, DELCEA C, DIMA A, OPRISAN E, JURCUT C, DAN GA. Influence of decision aids on oral anticoagulant prescribing among physicians: a randomised trial. Eur J Clin Invest. 2017;47(9):649-658.10.1111/eci.12786]Search in Google Scholar
[13. RUIZ-AZAROLA A, PERESTELO-PÉREZ L. Citizens’ participation in health: education and shared decision-making. SESPAS Report 2012. Gaceta Sanitaria, 2012; 26 (Suppl. 1): 158–161.10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.10.005]Search in Google Scholar