Complementary use of conduction system pacing techniques for the “pace and ablate” strategy in permanent atrial fibrillation - a case report
Article Category: Case Report
Publicado en línea: 03 jun 2024
Páginas: -
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rjc-2024-0011
Palabras clave
© 2024 Pestrea Catalin et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Introduction
The feasibility of the conduction system pacing combined with atrioventricular node ablation was demonstrated in patients with atrial fibrillation in whom rate control can’t be achieved with medication and heart failure.
Clinical case
We present a case of an 82-year-old man with a personal history of permanent atrial fibrillation, admitted with symptoms of heart failure. The resting electrocardiogram showed a very fast ventricular response, and the echocardiography showed a depressed left ventricular function, raising the suspicion of a tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy. Since the patient was on maximum doses of atrioventricular nodal-blocking drugs, we opted for a physiological pacing and atrioventricular node ablation strategy. First, the His bundle capture was achieved at low pacing thresholds, and ablation of the atrioventricular node was attempted. Unfortunately, after several failed attempts, an acute increase in the His bundle capture threshold was noted, suggesting inadvertent tissue ablation beneath the pacing lead. In this scenario, we removed the lead from the His bundle area and achieved optimal left bundle branch area pacing. With the lead in this position, atrioventricular node ablation was performed during the first attempt. At the six-month follow-up, there was no recovery of atrioventricular node conduction. Device interrogation revealed stable pacing and sensing parameters, and there was a significant improvement in clinical status and left ventricular function.
Conclusions
Mastering both His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing offers the potential to overcome intraprocedural challenges, giving alternative strategies to achieve physiological pacing. These approaches can be used interchangeably based on the evolving dynamics of the procedure and the patient’s specific needs.