[
Alothman, A., Godah, W., and Elsaka, B. (2016). Gravity field anomalies from recent GOCE satellite-based geopotential models and terrestrial gravity data: a comparative study over Saudi Arabia. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 9(5), doi:10.1007/s12517-016-2393-y.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barthelmes, F. (2009). Definition of functionals of the geopotential and their calculation from spherical harmonic models: theory and formulas used by the calculation service of the International Centre for Global Earth Models (ICGEM). Technical report, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bedada, T. B. (2010). Absolute geopotential height system for Ethiopia. PhD thesis, The University of Edinburgh.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennett, R. A. (2007). Instantaneous slip rates from geology and geodesy. Geophysical Journal International, 169(1):19–28, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.2007.03331.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brockmann, J. M., Schubert, T., and Schuh, W.-D. (2021). An improved model of the Earth’s static gravity field solely derived from reprocessed GOCE data. Surveys in Geophysics, 42:277–316, doi:10.1007/s10712-020-09626-0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruinsma, S. L., Förste, C., Abrikosov, O., Lemoine, J., Marty, J., Mulet, S., Rio, M., and Bonvalot, S. (2014). ESA’s satellite-only gravity field model via the direct approach based on all GOCE data. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(21):7508–7514, doi:10.1002/2014gl062045.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bucha, B. and Janák, J. (2014). A MATLAB-based graphical user interface program for computing functionals of the geopotential up to ultra-high degrees and orders: Efficient computation at irregular surfaces. Computers & Geosciences, 66:219–227, doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2014.02.005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drinkwater, M. R., Floberghagen, R., Haagmans, R., Muzi, D., and Popescu, A. (2003). VII: Closing Session: GOCE: ESA’s first Earth explorer core mission. Space Science Reviews, 108(1/2):419–432, doi:10.1023/a:1026104216284.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dykowski, P., Krynski, J., and Sękowski, M. (2015). The A10 Gravimeter Total Uncertainty Budget Estimation: A Case Study Using the A10-020, pages 219–225. Springer International Publishing, doi:10.1007/1345_2015_98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flechtner, F., Neumayer, K.-H., Dahle, C., Dobslaw, H., Fagiolini, E., Raimondo, J.-C., and Güntner, A. (2015). What can be expected from the GRACE-FO laser ranging interferometer for Earth science applications? Surveys in Geophysics, 37(2):453–470, doi:10.1007/s10712-015-9338-y.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forsberg, R. (1984). A study of terrain reductions, density anomalies and geophysical inversion methods in gravity field modelling. Technical Report 355, Ohio State University, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forsberg, R. and Olesen, A. V. (2010). Airborne Gravity Field Determination, pages 83–104. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11741-1_3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fukushima, T. (2012). Recursive computation of finite difference of associated Legendre functions. Journal of Geodesy, 86(9):745–754, doi:10.1007/s00190-012-0553-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Förste, C., Bruinsma, S., Abrikosov, O., Lemoine, J.-M., Marty, J. C., Flechtner, F., Balmino, G., Barthelmes, F., and Biancale, R. (2014). EIGEN-6C4 The latest combined global gravity field model including GOCE data up to degree and order 2190 of GFZ Potsdam and GRGS Toulouse. GFZ Data Services.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godah, W. and Krynski, J. (2015). Comparison of GGMs based on one year GOCE observations with the EGM08 and terrestrial data over the area of Sudan. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 35:128–135, doi:10.1016/j.jag.2013.11.003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godah, W., Krynski, J., and Szelachowska, M. (2015). On the accuracy assessment of the consecutive releases of GOCE-based GGMs over the area of Poland. Newton’s Bulletin. Assessment of GOCE Geopotential Models, 5:49–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godah, W., Krynski, J., and Szelachowska, M. (2018a). The use of absolute gravity data for the validation of Global Geopotential Models and for improving quasigeoid heights determined from satellite-only Global Geopotential Models. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 152:38–47, doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.03.002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godah, W. and Kryński, J. (2013). Evaluation of recent goce geopotential models over the area of Poland. Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia, 171(10):379–386, doi:10.13168/agg.2013.0037.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godah, W., Szelachowska, M., and Krynski, J. (2014). Accuracy assessment of GOCE-based geopotential models and their use for modelling the gravimetric quasigeoid - A case study for Poland. Geodesy and Cartography, 63(1):3–24, doi:10.2478/geocart-2014-0001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godah, W. H., Gedamu, A. A., and Bedada, T. B. (2018b). On the contribution of dedicated gravity satellite missions to the modelling of the Earth gravity field – A case study of Ethiopia and Uganda in East Africa. Geoinformation Issues, 10(1):5–15, doi:10.34867/GI.2018.1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goyal, R., Dikshit, O., and Balasubramania, N. (2019). Evaluation of global geopotential models: a case study for India. Survey review, 51(368):402–412, doi:10.1080/00396265.2018.1468537.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gruber, T., Bamber, J. L., Bierkens, M. F. P., Dobslaw, H., Murböck, M., Thomas, M., van Beek, L. P. H., van Dam, T., Vermeersen, L. L. A., and Visser, P. N. A. M. (2011). Simulation of the time-variable gravity field by means of coupled geophysical models. Earth System Science Data, 3(1):19–35, doi:10.5194/essd-3-19-2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heiskanen, W. A. and Moritz, H. (1967). Physical geodesy. W. H. Freeman & Co Ltd.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hirt, C., Gruber, T., and Featherstone, W. E. (2011). Evaluation of the first GOCE static gravity field models using terrestrial gravity, vertical deflections and EGM2008 quasigeoid heights. Journal of Geodesy, 85(10):723–740, doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0482-y.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ince, E. S., Barthelmes, F., Reißland, S., Elger, K., Förste, C., Flechtner, F., and Schuh, H. (2019). ICGEM – 15 years of successful collection and distribution of global gravitational models, associated services, and future plans. Earth System Science Data, 11(2):647–674, doi:10.5194/essd-11-647-2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krynski, J. and Kloch, G. (2009). Evaluation of the performance of the new EGM08 global geopotential model over Poland. Geoin-formation Issues, 1(1):7–17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lambeck, K. (1988). Geophysical geodesy – The slow deformations of the Earth. Research supported by CNES and Universite de Paris VI. Oxford and New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liang, W., Li, J., Xu, X., Zhang, S., and Zhao, Y. (2020). A high-resolution Earth’s gravity field model SGG-UGM-2 from GOCE, GRACE, satellite altimetry, and EGM2008. Engineering, 6(8):860–878, doi:10.1016/j.eng.2020.05.008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moritz, H. (2000). Geodetic Reference System 1980. Journal of Geodesy, 74(1):128–133, doi:10.1007/s001900050278.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Odera, P. A. (2020). Evaluation of the recent high-degree combined global gravity-field models for geoid modelling over Kenya. Geodesy and Cartography, 46(2):48–54, doi:10.3846/gac.2020.10453.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Odera, P. A. and Fukuda, Y. (2017). Evaluation of GOCE-based global gravity field models over Japan after the full mission using free-air gravity anomalies and geoid undulations. Earth, Planets and Space, 69(1), doi:10.1186/s40623-017-0716-1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pavlis, N. K., Holmes, S. A., Kenyon, S. C., and Factor, J. K. (2012). The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 117(B4), doi:10.1029/2011jb008916.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pham, H. T., Claessens, S., Kuhn, M., and Awange, J. (2023). Performance evaluation of high/ultra-high-degree global geopotential models over Vietnam using GNSS/leveling data. Geodesy and Geodynamics, doi:10.1016/j.geog.2023.03.002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reigber, C., Lühr, H., and Schwintzer, P. (2002). CHAMP mission status. Advances in Space Research, 30(2):129–134, doi:10.1016/s0273-1177(02)00276-4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rummel, R., Yi, W., and Stummer, C. (2011). GOCE gravitational gradiometry. Journal of Geodesy, 85(11):777–790, doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0500-0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tapley, B. D., Bettadpur, S., Ries, J. C., Thompson, P. F., and Watkins, M. M. (2004). GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system. Science, 305(5683):503–505, doi:10.1126/science.1099192.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tscherning, C. (1992). The GRAVSOFT package for geoid determination. In Proc 1st IAG Continental Workshop of the Geoid in Europe, Prague, 1992.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu, Y., He, X., Luo, Z., and Shi, H. (2021). An assessment of recently released high-degree global geopotential models based on heterogeneous geodetic and ocean data. Frontiers in Earth Science, 9, doi:10.3389/feart.2021.749611.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu, X., Li, J., Zhao, Y., and Wei, H. (2023). A GOCE only gravity model GOSG02S based on the SGG and SST observations. GFZ Data Services.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yuan, H., Wan, X., Wu, Y., Peng, Y., and Guo, Z. (2022). Evaluation of ultra-high degree gravity field models: a case study of Eastern Tibetan Plateau and Sichuan Province. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 33(1), doi:10.1007/s44195-022-00014-2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhao, Y., Li, J., Xu, X., and Su, Y. (2023). WHU-SWPU-GOGR2022S: A combined gravity model of GOCE and GRACE. GFZ Data Services.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zingerle, P., Brockmann, J. M., Pail, R., Gruber, T., and Willberg, M. (2019). The polar extended gravity field model TIM_R6e. GFZ Data Services.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zingerle, P., Pail, R., Gruber, T., and Oikonomidou, X. (2020). The combined global gravity field model XGM2019e. Journal of Geodesy, 94(7), doi:10.1007/s00190-020-01398-0.
]Search in Google Scholar
, 