It was demonstrated that angiogenesis is closely associated with tumor growth, as the development of vasculature has the capacity to supply oxygen and nutrients to dividing tumor cells.1 Microvascular alterations are therefore typical signatures of early tumor development and progression. Conventional techniques for assessing microvascular changes are narrow band imaging (NBI)23 and confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE)45 in endoscopy and confocal laser microscopy (CLM)6 and dermoscopy7 in skin diagnosis. However, NBI has limited resolution, and CLE utilizes exogenous tracers, while CLM and dermoscopy cannot visualize deeper vascular changes due to a limited penetration depth, with blood vessels also often being hidden in pigmented lesions. To address these shortcomings, various emerging imaging techniques have been explored for microvascular imaging.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a mature imaging technique that uses low-coherence light to capture high-resolution, cross-sectional images of biological tissues in real time. It has been applied in various fields of medicine8 due to its noninvasiveness, high resolution, and ability to visualize microstructure and has become the gold standard for diagnosis in ophthalmology.9 It is thus not surprising that OCT has found its way into oncological applications as well.10 To enable further functional assessment of tumors, optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is an impending valuable extension of OCT in oncological research and clinical practice. OCTA is a modification of OCT and works by comparing the light waves that are reflected from stationary tissue with the light waves that are reflected from moving red blood cells (RBCs), and this information is then used to create a detailed map of the blood vessels (Figure 1). The distinct advantage of OCTA is that it is a noncontact, nonionizing, and noninvasive modality and does not require a contrast agent. OCTA has proven highly valuable in helping to better understand and manage a range of nononcological ocular pathologies11,12,13, while in oncological ocular clinical applications, OCTA has potential for use in the diagnosis and monitoring of chorioretinal pathologies, such as neovascularization and macular edema.14
Optical coherence angiography (OCTA) scanning protocol.
How valuable OCTA could be in quantifying microvascular changes in nonocular clinical oncology remains unclear, and to that end, we decided to systematically review the literature with the intention of exclusively focusing only on studies in which OCTA was performed on patients in the clinical oncology setting.
Two authors (R.H. and M.M.) conducted jointly—to preclude potential bias—a comprehensive literature search on August 3, 2023, through PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus electronic databases using the following search terms: “optical coherence tomography angiography tumors” and “dynamic optical coherence tomography tumors”. No restrictions on publication date or language were imposed. The inclusion criterion was the nonocular application of OCTA in the oncological clinical setting, meaning that all ocular oncological clinical studies and all ocular and nonocular animal and phantom,
Included articles reporting the use of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) to quantify microvascular changes in nonocular clinical applications in oncology
2014 | 1 | Nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus | |
2017 | 52 | Nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus surveillance or endoscopic eradication therapies for low-grade/high-grade dysplasia | |
2017 | 25 | Radiotherapy of oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal cancer | |
2016 | 1 | Naevus to melanoma transition | |
2017 | 47 | Actinic keratosis, Bowen's disease and squamous cell carcinoma | |
2018 | 81 | Basal cell carcinoma | |
2019 | 7 | Basal cell carcinoma | |
2019 | 27 | Basal cell carcinoma | |
2018 | 127 | Melanoma | |
2021 | 159 | Melanoma | |
2023 | 130 | Nevi |
GI = gastrointestinal
In total, 3977 articles were found to be of interest in the PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases; it is noteworthy that 3855 articles (96.9% of total) were linked to ocular oncological studies. After excluding duplicates and applying the exclusion criteria, first considering the title and abstract and then, if necessary, reading the entire article, 11 articles were identified for further analysis. The anatomical locations of tumors in the selected articles were the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (2 articles), head and neck (1 article) and skin (8 articles).
A pioneering effort in assessing microvasculature by means of OCTA in clinical oncology was the work of Tsai
Images obtained through optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for
In the study by Maslennikova
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) acquisition system. OCTA images were acquired in real time. Taken from Maslennikova
De Carvalho
Illustration of two distinct vascular features observed through dermoscopy and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). The first feature, referred to as “blobs”, is small, isolated points with a simple round appearance; the second feature, called “curves”, is narrow, curved, continuous structures of varying length. Panel
In a subsequent study20, the same group continued with the differentiation of common basal cell carcinoma (BCC) subtypes by scanning 81 patients with 98 BCC lesions, of which 27 were superficial BCC (sBCC), 55 were nodular BCC (nBCC) and 16 were infiltrative BCC (iBCC). In this study, they found various structural and microvascular features that would aid in identifying nBCC, iBCC and sBCC subtypes. For example, it was shown that the presence of so-called “serpiginous” vessels, i.e., wavy structures of varying length, indicated an increased risk of nBCC and a reduced risk of sBCC.
Meiburger
Gubarkova
De Carvalho
Microvascularization in skin lesions (nevi, dysplastic nevi, and melanomas) through optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) scans (denoted as D-OCT).
Based on this literature review, the inference could be made that OCTA is still finding its place in oncological clinical applications. It appears that the translation of OCTA from ocular applications to the nonocular clinical oncology setting faces certain limitations that could potentially hinder its widespread adoption.
One of the obvious limitations of OCTA in nonocular clinical oncology settings is its restricted penetration depth. OCTA relies on detecting motion contrast generated by moving RBCs, which limits its applicability to superficial structures. Tumors and lesions in deeper anatomical locations, such as within organs or soft tissues, may not be adequately visualized using OCTA due to limited tissue penetration. This constraint hampers its potential for comprehensive evaluation and monitoring of oncological conditions.
However, this limitation can be overcome by using endoscopic techniques bringing the instrument closer to the tissue of interest. As demonstrated in the GI tract studies by Tsai
Another possibility to increase the OCTA penetration depth is to use OCTA systems with longer wavelengths. In the studies presented in this article, the OCTA systems utilized 1.3 μm wavelengths, which is a typical wavelength also used for skin imaging; in ophthalmology, a shorter wavelength of 0.8 μm is typically used, resulting in an approximately 60% lower penetration depth. In a recent publication by Nishizawa and Yamanaka27, it was shown that by using a 1.7 μm wavelength, the penetration depth increases by approximately 40% compared to a 1.3 μm wavelength. Therefore, by developing OCTA systems with even longer wavelengths, larger penetration depths could be obtained.
OCTA provides detailed structural information about blood vessels but lacks the ability to differentiate between different vessel types. In the field of oncology, the distinction between arterial and venous vasculatures is crucial, as tumor angiogenesis is primarily associated with the growth of new abnormal blood vessels. Accurate differentiation between these types of vessels aids in assessing tumor progression and treatment response. Unfortunately, OCTA's current capabilities fail to provide this level of vessel characterization, limiting its effectiveness in nonocular oncological settings.
In ophthalmology, recent articles report the possibility of differentiating between arteries and veins utilizing various OCTA image parameters, including vascular diameters and shape and perfusion intensity density.28 However, the current methods for artery-vein classification in OCTA employ complex algorithms, thereby making it difficult for clinical applications. To alleviate this hindrance, deep learning algorithms were developed to reduce the complexity and automate artery-vein classification.29 Similar algorithms should also be developed for other OCTA modalities.
Movement, including patient motion during OCTA acquisition, can introduce motion artifacts, leading to image distortions and reduced image quality. Unlike ophthalmology, where patients can fixate on a target, patients in nonocular oncology settings often have limited control over motion, making motion artifacts more challenging to mitigate. This limitation can compromise the accuracy and reliability of OCTA in nonocular clinical oncology, demanding the need for advanced postprocessing algorithms to improve image quality.
Since motion artifacts are well-known sources of artifacts in OCT imaging, they have been extensively researched. One possibility is to detect and compensate for the axial motion artifacts pixelwise by comparing the topology of different layers in tissue, and the motion artifacts are then compensated by shifting the pixel numbers with the value detected.29 Another possibility is to remove the affected scans in the software and to use only the nonaffected scans for vasculature image reconstruction.30 However, this approach may increase the duration of imaging sessions; therefore, it would be better to use an approach without the need for rescanning. As a solution, it was demonstrated that the motion contribution to the OCT signal can be reasonably estimated by considering statistics of the measured flow signal across all voxels.30 By implementing motion artifact compensation strategies, the translation of OCTA to clinical workflow would become more feasible.
The lack of standardized protocols and interpretation guidelines is a significant limitation of OCTA in nonocular clinical oncology. Unlike ophthalmology, where standardized imaging protocols and interpretation criteria exist, the application of OCTA in oncology lacks such standardization. As a result, different centers may use varying acquisition settings, image processing algorithms, or interpretation approaches, leading to inconsistent and noncomparable results. Establishing standardized protocols and guidelines specific to nonocular oncology would enhance the accuracy and reproducibility of OCTA findings.
While OCTA has shown great promise in ophthalmology, its translation to the nonocular clinical oncology setting faces limitations. In particular, the lack of standardized protocols and interpretation guidelines poses a significant challenge. Addressing these limitations through advancements in technology, algorithm development, and a larger number of clinical sites initiating clinical trials is essential for realizing the full potential of OCTA in nonocular clinical oncology.