This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 825-30. doi: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b3b2d8BuellJFCherquiDGellerDAO’RourkeNIannittiDDagherIet alThe international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 200820092508253010.1097/sla.0b013e3181b3b2d8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G. Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 2016; 263: 761-77. doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001413CiriaRCherquiDGellerDABricenoJWakabayashiGComparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing20162637617710.1097/sla.0000000000001413Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 619-29. doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001184WakabayashiGCherquiDGellerDABuellJFKanekoHHanHSet alRecommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka20152616192910.1097/sla.0000000000001184Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cherqui D, Wakabayashi G, Geller DA, Buell JF, Han HS, Soubrane O, et al. The need for organization of laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2016; 23: 665-67. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.401CherquiDWakabayashiGGellerDABuellJFHanHSSoubraneOet alThe need for organization of laparoscopic liver resection2016236656710.1002/jhbp.401Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi RI, Alikhanov R, et al. The Southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg 2018; 268: 11-8. doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002524AbuHilal MAldrighettiLDagherIEdwinBTroisiRIAlikhanovRet alThe Southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation201826811810.1097/sla.0000000000002524Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wakabayashi G. What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2016; 5: 2819. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2016.03.03WakabayashiGWhat has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection?20165281910.21037/hbsn.2016.03.03Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hasegawa Y, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, Takahara T, Katagiri H, Umemura A, et al. A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 5356-63. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5616-8HasegawaYWakabayashiGNittaHTakaharaTKatagiriHUmemuraAet alA novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty20173153566310.1007/s00464-017-5616-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, Gayet B. Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification. Ann Surg 2018; 267: 13-7. doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002176KawaguchiYFuksDKokudoNGayetBDifficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification201826713710.1097/sla.0000000000002176Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hallet J, Pessaux P, Beyfuss KA, Jayaraman S, Serrano PE, Martel G, et al. Critical appraisal of predictive tools to assess the difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2019; 33: 366-76. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6479-3HalletJPessauxPBeyfussKAJayaramanSSerranoPEMartelGet alCritical appraisal of predictive tools to assess the difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review2019333667610.1007/s00464-018-6479-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Halls MC, Berardi G, Cipriani F, Barkhatov L, Lainas P, Harris S, et al. Development and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 2018; 105: 118291. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10821HallsMCBerardiGCiprianiFBarkhatovLLainasPHarrisSet alDevelopment and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection201810511829110.1002/bjs.10821Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ivanecz A, Plahuta I, Magdalenić T, Mencinger M, Peruš I, Potrč S, et al. The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection. BMC Surg 2019; 19: 179. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0645-yIvaneczAPlahutaIMagdalenićTMencingerMPerušIPotrčSet alThe external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection20191917910.1186/s12893-019-0645-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Guilbaud T, Birnbaum DJ, Berdah S, Farges O, Beyer Berjot L. Learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection, educational value of simulation and training programmes: a systematic review. World J Surg 2019; 43: 2710-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05111-xGuilbaudTBirnbaumDJBerdahSFargesOBeyerBerjot LLearning curve in laparoscopic liver resection, educational value of simulation and training programmes: a systematic review2019432710910.1007/s00268-019-05111-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Komatsu S, Scatton O, Goumard C, Sepulveda A, Brustia R, Perdigao F, et al. Development process and technical aspects of laparoscopic hepatectomy: learning curve based on 15 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 224: 841-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.037KomatsuSScattonOGoumardCSepulvedaABrustiaRPerdigaoFet alDevelopment process and technical aspects of laparoscopic hepatectomy: learning curve based on 15 years of experience20172248415010.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.037Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
van der Poel MJ, Besselink MG, Cipriani F, Armstrong T, Takhar AS, van Dieren S, et al. Outcome and learning curve in 159 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. JAMA Surg 2016; 151: 923-28. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1655vander Poel MJBesselinkMGCiprianiFArmstrongTTakharASvanDieren Set alOutcome and learning curve in 159 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy20161519232810.1001/jamasurg.2016.1655Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 772-82. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bd93b2ViganoLLaurentATayarCTomatisMPontiACherquiDThe learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility20092507728210.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bd93b2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Villani V, Bohnen JD, Torabi R, Sabbatino F, Chang DC, Ferrone CR. “Idealized” vs. “True” learning curves: the case of laparoscopic liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 2016; 18: 504-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.03.610VillaniVBohnenJDTorabiRSabbatinoFChangDCFerroneCR.“Idealized” vs. “True” learning curves: the case of laparoscopic liver resection201618504910.1016/j.hpb.2016.03.610Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Han HS, Cho JY, Yoon YS. Techniques for performing laparoscopic liver resection in various hepatic locations. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009; 16: 427-32. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0118-2HanHSChoJYYoonYSTechniques for performing laparoscopic liver resection in various hepatic locations2009164273210.1007/s00534-009-0118-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ivanecz A, Krebs B, Stozer A, Jagric T, Plahuta I, Potrc S. Simultaneous pure laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases: a single institution experience with propensity score matching analysis. Radiol Oncol 2018; 52: 42-53. doi: 10.1515/raon-2017-0047IvaneczAKrebsBStozerAJagricTPlahutaIPotrcSSimultaneous pure laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases: a single institution experience with propensity score matching analysis201852425310.1515/raon-2017-0047Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ivanecz A, Pivec V, Ilijevec B, Rudolf S, Potrč S. Laparoscopic anatomical liver resection after complex blunt liver trauma: a case report. Surg Case Rep 2018; 4: 25. doi: 10.1186/s40792-018-0432-5IvaneczAPivecVIlijevecBRudolfSPotrčSLaparoscopic anatomical liver resection after complex blunt liver trauma: a case report201842510.1186/s40792-018-0432-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ivanecz A, Plahuta I, Magdalenić T, Ilijevec B, Mencinger M, Peruš I, et al. Evaluation of the Iwate model for predicting the difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: does tumor size matter? J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25: 145160. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04657-9IvaneczAPlahutaIMagdalenićTIlijevecBMencingerMPerušIet alEvaluation of the Iwate model for predicting the difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: does tumor size matter?20212514516010.1007/s11605-020-04657-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Weibull W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 1951; 18: 293-97.WeibullWA statistical distribution function of wide applicability1951182939710.1115/1.4010337Search in Google Scholar
Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973; 60: 646-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800600817PughRNMurray-LyonIMDawsonJLPietroniMCWilliamsRTransection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices197360646910.1002/bjs.1800600817Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Strasberg SM, Belghiti J, Clavien PA, Gadzijev E, Garden JO, Lau WY, et al. The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2000; 2: 333-39. doi: 10.1016/S1365-182X(17)30755-4StrasbergSMBelghitiJClavienPAGadzijevEGardenJOLauWYet alThe Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections200023333910.1016/S1365-182X(17)30755-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kazaryan AM, Røsok BI, Marangos IP, Rosseland AR, Edwin B. Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral segments. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3881-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1815-xKazaryanAMRøsokBIMarangosIPRosselandAREdwinBComparative evaluation of laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral segments2011253881910.1007/s00464-011-1815-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2ClavienPABarkunJde OliveiraMLVautheyJNDindoDSchulickRDet alThe Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience20092501879610.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hopper AN, Jamison MH, Lewis WG. Learning curves in surgical practice. Postgrad Med J 2007; 83: 777-9. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.057190HopperANJamisonMHLewisWGLearning curves in surgical practice200783777910.1136/pgmj.2007.057190Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pusic MV, Boutis K, Hatala R, Cook DA. Learning curves in health professions education. Acad Med 2015; 90: 1034-42. doi: 10.1097/acm.0000000000000681PusicMVBoutisKHatalaRCookDALearning curves in health professions education20159010344210.1097/acm.0000000000000681Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 831-41. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4dfNguyenKTGamblinTCGellerDAWorld review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients20092508314110.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4dfOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Costi R, Scatton O, Haddad L, Randone B, Andraus W, Massault PP, et al. Lessons learned from the first 100 laparoscopic liver resections: not delaying conversion may allow reduced blood loss and operative time. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012; 22: 425-31. doi: 10.1089/ lap.2011.0334CostiRScattonOHaddadLRandoneBAndrausWMassaultPPet alLessons learned from the first 100 laparoscopic liver resections: not delaying conversion may allow reduced blood loss and operative time2012224253110.1089/lap.2011.0334Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Halls MC, Cipriani F, Berardi G, Barkhatov L, Lainas P, Alzoubi M, et al. Conversion for unfavorable intraoperative events results in significantly worse outcomes during laparoscopic liver resection: lessons learned from a multicenter review of 2861 cases. Ann Surg 2018; 268: 1051-57. doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002332HallsMCCiprianiFBerardiGBarkhatovLLainasPAlzoubiMet alConversion for unfavorable intraoperative events results in significantly worse outcomes during laparoscopic liver resection: lessons learned from a multicenter review of 2861 cases201826810515710.1097/sla.0000000000002332Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Azagra JS, Goergen M, Gilbart E, Jacobs D. Laparoscopic anatomical (hepatic) left lateral segmentectomy-technical aspects. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 758-61. doi: 10.1007/bf00193052AzagraJSGoergenMGilbartEJacobsDLaparoscopic anatomical (hepatic) left lateral segmentectomy-technical aspects1996107586110.1007/bf00193052Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, et al. A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2014; 21: 745-53. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.166BanDTanabeMItoHOtsukaYNittaHAbeYet alA novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection2014217455310.1002/jhbp.166Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Goh BKP, Prieto M, Syn N, Koh YX, Lim KI. Critical appraisal of the learning curve of minimally invasive hepatectomy: experience with the first 200 cases of a Southeast Asian early adopter. ANZ J Surg 2020; 90: 1092-98. doi: 10.1111/ans.15683GohBKPPrietoMSynNKohYXLimKICritical appraisal of the learning curve of minimally invasive hepatectomy: experience with the first 200 cases of a Southeast Asian early adopter20209010929810.1111/ans.15683Open DOISearch in Google Scholar