The role of unenhanced phase of the liver in the scanning protocol of metastatic breast cancer: implications for sensitivity, response evaluation and size measurement
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492BrayFFerlayJSoerjomataramISiegelRLTorreLAJemalAGlobal cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries20186839442410.3322/caac.2149230207593Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chikarmane SA, Tirumani SH, Howard SA, Jagannathan JP, DiPiro P. Metastatic patterns of breast cancer subtypes: what radiologists should know in the era of personalized cancer medicine. Clin Radiol 2015; 70: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.08.015ChikarmaneSATirumaniSHHowardSAJagannathanJPDiPiroPMetastatic patterns of breast cancer subtypes: what radiologists should know in the era of personalized cancer medicine20157011010.1016/j.crad.2014.08.01525300558Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zimmerman P, Lu DS, Yang LY, Chen S, Sayre J, Kadell B. Hepatic metastases from breast carcinoma: comparison of noncontrast, arterial-dominant, and portal-dominant phase spiral CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24: 197-203. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200003000-00003ZimmermanPLuDSYangLYChenSSayreJKadellBHepatic metastases from breast carcinoma: comparison of noncontrast, arterial-dominant, and portal-dominant phase spiral CT20002419720310.1097/00004728-200003000-0000310752878Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sica GT, Ji H, Ros PR. CT and MR imaging of hepatic metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 691-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.3.1740691SicaGTJiHRosPRCT and MR imaging of hepatic metastases2000174691810.2214/ajr.174.3.174069110701611Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Francis IR, Cohan RH, McNulty NJ, Platt JF, Korobkin M, Gebremariam A, et al. Multidetector CT of the liver and hepatic neoplasms: effect of multiphasic imaging on tumor conspicuity and vascular enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1217-24. doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.5.1801217FrancisIRCohanRHMcNultyNJPlattJFKorobkinMGebremariamAet alMultidetector CT of the liver and hepatic neoplasms: effect of multiphasic imaging on tumor conspicuity and vascular enhancement200318012172410.2214/ajr.180.5.180121712704026Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Soyer P, Poccard M, Boudiaf M, Abitbol M, HamziL, Panis Y, et al. Detection of hypovascular hepatic metastases at triple-phase helical CT: sensitivity of phases and comparison with surgical and histopathologic findings. Radiology 2004; 231: 413-20. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2312021639SoyerPPoccardMBoudiafMAbitbolMHamziLPanisYet alDetection of hypovascular hepatic metastases at triple-phase helical CT: sensitivity of phases and comparison with surgical and histopathologic findings20042314132010.1148/radiol.231202163915044747Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DuBrow RA, David CL, Libshitz HI, Lorigan JG. Detection of hepatic metastases in breast cancer: the role of nonenhanced and enhanced CT scanning. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990; 14: 366-9. doi: 10.1097/00004728199005000-00008DuBrowRADavidCLLibshitzHILoriganJGDetection of hepatic metastases in breast cancer: the role of nonenhanced and enhanced CT scanning199014366910.1097/00004728199005000-00008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Patten RM, Byun JY, Freeny PC. CT of hypervascular hepatic tumors: are unenhanced scans necessary for diagnosis? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 979-84. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.5.8273641PattenRMByunJYFreenyPCCT of hypervascular hepatic tumors: are unenhanced scans necessary for diagnosis?19931619798410.2214/ajr.161.5.82736418273641Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
O’Malley ME, Halpern E, Mueller PR, Gazelle GS. Helical CT protocols for the abdomen and pelvis: a survey. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 109-13. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750109O’MalleyMEHalpernEMuellerPRGazelleGSHelical CT protocols for the abdomen and pelvis: a survey20001751091310.2214/ajr.175.1.175010910882257Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Frederick MG, Paulson EK, Nelson RC. Helical CT for detecting focal liver lesions in patients with breast carcinoma: comparison of noncontrast phase, hepatic arterial phase, and portal venous phase. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21: 229-35. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199703000-00012FrederickMGPaulsonEKNelsonRCHelical CT for detecting focal liver lesions in patients with breast carcinoma: comparison of noncontrast phase, hepatic arterial phase, and portal venous phase1997212293510.1097/00004728-199703000-000129071291Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sheafor DH, Frederick MG, Paulson EK, Keogan MT, DeLong DM, Nelson RC. Comparison of unenhanced, hepatic arterial-dominant, and portal venous-dominant phase helical CT for the detection of liver metastases in women with breast carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 961-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.172.4.10587129SheaforDHFrederickMGPaulsonEKKeoganMTDeLongDMNelsonRCComparison of unenhanced, hepatic arterial-dominant, and portal venous-dominant phase helical CT for the detection of liver metastases in women with breast carcinoma1999172961810.2214/ajr.172.4.1058712910587129Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sadigh G, Applegate KE, Baumgarten DA. Comparative accuracy of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT versus noncontrast CT plus intravenous contrast-enhanced CT in the detection and characterization of patients with hypervascular liver metastases: a critically appraised topic. Acad Radiol 2014; 21: 113-25. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.08.023SadighGApplegateKEBaumgartenDAComparative accuracy of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT versus noncontrast CT plus intravenous contrast-enhanced CT in the detection and characterization of patients with hypervascular liver metastases: a critically appraised topic2014211132510.1016/j.acra.2013.08.02324331274Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
García-Garrigós E, Arenas-Jiménez JJ, Sánchez-Payá J. Best Protocol for combined contrast-enhanced thoracic and abdominal CT for lung cancer: a single-institution randomized crossover clinical trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210: 1226-34. doi: 10.2214/ajr.17.19185García-GarrigósEArenas-JiménezJJSánchez-PayáJBest Protocol for combined contrast-enhanced thoracic and abdominal CT for lung cancer: a single-institution randomized crossover clinical trial201821012263410.2214/ajr.17.1918529570376Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cardoso F, Senkus E, Costa A, Papadopoulos E, Aapro M, Andre F, et al. 4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4). Ann Oncol 2018; 29: 1634-57. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy192CardosoFSenkusECostaAPapadopoulosEAaproMAndreFet al4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)20182916345710.1093/annonc/mdy192736014630032243Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Barter S, Britton P. Breast cancer. In: Nicholson T, editor. Recommendations for cross-sectional imaging in cancer management. Second edition. London: The Royal College of Radiologists; 2014.BarterSBrittonPBreast cancerInNicholsonTeditorLondonThe Royal College of Radiologists2014Search in Google Scholar
Johnson PT, Bello JA, Chatfield MB, Flug JA, Pandharipande PV, Rohatgi S, et al. New ACR choosing wisely recommendations: judicious use of multiphase abdominal CT protocols. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 16: 56-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.07.026JohnsonPTBelloJAChatfieldMBFlugJAPandharipandePVRohatgiSet alNew ACR choosing wisely recommendations: judicious use of multiphase abdominal CT protocols201916566010.1016/j.jacr.2018.07.02630219345Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Siewert B, Sosna J, McNamara A, Raptopoulos V, Kruskal JB. Missed lesions at abdominal oncologic CT: lessons learned from quality assurance. Radiographics 2008; 28: 623-38. doi: 10.1148/rg.283075188SiewertBSosnaJMcNamaraARaptopoulosVKruskalJBMissed lesions at abdominal oncologic CT: lessons learned from quality assurance2008286233810.1148/rg.28307518818480475Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Oliver JH 3rd, Baron RL, Federle MP, Jones BC, Sheng R. Hypervascular liver metastases: do unenhanced and hepatic arterial phase CT images affect tumor detection? Radiology 1997; 205: 709-15. doi: 10.1148/radiology.205.3.9393525OliverJH3rdBaronRLFederleMPJonesBCShengRHypervascular liver metastases: do unenhanced and hepatic arterial phase CT images affect tumor detection?19972057091510.1148/radiology.205.3.93935259393525Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jee HB, Park MJ, Lee HS, Park MS, Kim MJ, Chung YE. Is non-contrast CT adequate for the evaluation of hepatic metastasis in patients who cannot receive iodinated contrast media? PLoS One 2015; 10: e0134133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134133JeeHBParkMJLeeHSParkMSKimMJChungYEIs non-contrast CT adequate for the evaluation of hepatic metastasis in patients who cannot receive iodinated contrast media?201510e013413310.1371/journal.pone.0134133451776126218533Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Huh J, Park J, Kim KW, Kim HJ, Lee JS, Lee JH, et al. Optimal phase of dynamic computed tomography for reliable size measurement of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors of the liver: comparison between pre- and post-contrast phases. Korean J Radiol 2018; 19: 1066-76. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1066HuhJParkJKimKWKimHJLeeJSLeeJHet alOptimal phase of dynamic computed tomography for reliable size measurement of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors of the liver: comparison between pre- and post-contrast phases20181910667610.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1066620197130386138Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026EisenhauerEATherassePBogaertsJSchwartzLHSargentDFordRet alNew response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)2009452284710.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.02619097774Open DOISearch in Google Scholar