[
1. Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Lang S, Tanderup K, de Leeuw A, Kirisits C, Lindegaard J, et al. Gyn GEC ESTRO network. Variation of treatment planning parameters (D90 HR-CTV, D 2cc for OAR) for cervical cancer tandem ring brachytherapy in a multicentre setting: comparisonof standard planningand 3D image guided optimisation based on a joint protocol for dose-volume constraints. Radiother Oncol 2010; 94: 339-45.10.1016/j.radonc.2009.10.01119944471
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Segedin B, Gugic J, Petric P. Uterine perforation - 5-year experience in 3-D image guided gynaecological brachytherapy at Institute of Oncology Ljubljana. Radiol Oncol 2013; 47: 154-60.10.2478/raon-2013-0030369108923801912
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Perez CA, Kavanagh BD. Uterine cervix. In: Halperin EC, Perez CA, Brady LW, editors. Principles et practice of radiation oncology. 5th edition, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 1532-609.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Gerbaulet A, Pötter R, Haie-Meder C. Cervix cancer. In: Gerbaulet A, Pötter R, Mazeron JJ, Meertens H, Van Limbergen E, editors. GECESTRO handbook of brachytherapy. Brussels: ESTRO; 2002. p. 301-63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Weitmann HD, Pötter R, Waldhäusl C, Nechvile E, Kirisits C, Knocke TH. Pilot study in the treatment of endometrial carcinoma with 3D image-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy using modified Heyman packing: clinical experience and dose-volume histogram analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 62: 468-78.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.10.01315890589
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Lindegaard JC, Tanderup K, Nielsen SK, Haack S, Gelineck J. MRI-guided 3D optimization significantly improves DVH parameters of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71: 756-64.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.03218191335
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Rogelj P, Hudej R, Petric P. Distance deviation measure of contouring variability. Radiol Oncol 2013; 47: 86-96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. De Brabandere M, Mousa AG, Nulens A, Swinnen A, Van Limbergen E. Potential of dose optimisation in MRI-based PDR brachytherapy of cervix carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2008; 88: 217-26.10.1016/j.radonc.2007.10.02618037524
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Petric P, Hudej R, Rogelj P, Blas M, Segedin B, Logar HB, Dimopoulos JC. Comparison of 3D MRI with high sampling efficiency and 2D multiplanar MRI forcontouring in cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiol Oncol 2012; 46: 242-51.10.2478/v10019-012-0023-1347295323077463
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Pötter R, Haie-Meder C, Van Limbergen E, Barillot I, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, et al. GEC ESTRO Working Group. Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol 2006; 78: 67-77.10.1016/j.radonc.2005.11.01416403584
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Lang S, Kirisits C, Dimopoulos J, Georg D, Pötter R. Treatment planning for MRI assisted brachytherapy of gynecologic malignancies based on total dose constraints. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 69: 619-27.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.01917869676
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Datta NR. From ‘points’ to ‘profiles’ in intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2005; 17: 35-41.10.1097/00001703-200502000-0000715711409
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Viswanathan AN, Dimopoulos J, Kirisits C, Berger D, Potter R. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-based contouring in cervical cancer brachytherapy: results of a prospective trial and preliminary guidelines for standardized contours. Int J Radiat Oncol Biolo Phys 2007; 69: 963-4.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2328
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Georg P, Kirisits C, Goldner G, Dorr W, Hammer J, Potzi R, et al. Correlation of dose-volume parameters, endoscopic and clinical rectal side effects in cervix cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy including MRI-based brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2009; 91: 173-80.10.1016/j.radonc.2009.01.00619243846
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Holloway CL, Racine ML, Cormack RA, O’Farrell DA, Viswanathan AN. Sigmoid dose using 3D imaging in cervical-cancer brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93: 307-10.10.1016/j.radonc.2009.06.032286746319665244
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Ahmad R, Hoogeman MS, Quint S, Mens JW, de Pree I, Heijmen BJ. Interfraction bladder filling variations and time trends for cervical cancer patients assesed with portabile 3-dimensional ultrasound bladder scanner. Radiother Oncol 2008; 89: 172-9.10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.00518703248
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Dimopoulos JC, Petrow P, Tanderup K, Petric P, Berger D, Kirisits C, et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (IV): Basic principles and parameters for MR imaging within the frame of image based adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2012; 103: 113-22.10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.024333608522296748
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Haripotepornkul NH, Nath SK, Scanderbeg D, Saenz C, Yashar CM. Evaluation of intra- and inter-fraction movement of the cervix during intensity modulated radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2011; 98: 347-51.10.1016/j.radonc.2010.11.01521216480
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Lim K, Kelly V, Stewart J, Xie J, Cho YB, Moseley J, et al. Pelvic radiotherapy for cancer of the cervix: is what you plan actually what you deliver? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 74: 304-12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. van de Bunt L, van der Heide UA, Ketelaars M, de Kort GA, Jürgenliemk- Schulz IM. Conventional, conformal, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning of external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer: The impact of tumor regression. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 64: 189-96.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.04.02515978745
]Search in Google Scholar
